At Westonci.ca, we connect you with experts who provide detailed answers to your most pressing questions. Start exploring now! Get expert answers to your questions quickly and accurately from our dedicated community of professionals. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform.
Sagot :
Certainly! Let's solve the problem step-by-step.
### Part a: Generating the first six terms of the sequence
The sequence is defined as:
[tex]\[ a_1 = 2 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ a_{n+1} = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_n + 4 \right) \][/tex]
Let's calculate the first six terms.
1. For [tex]\( n = 1 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_1 = 2 \][/tex]
2. For [tex]\( n = 2 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_2 = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_1 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \left(2 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \times 6 = 3 \][/tex]
3. For [tex]\( n = 3 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_3 = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_2 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \left(3 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \times 7 = 3.5 \][/tex]
4. For [tex]\( n = 4 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_4 = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_3 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \left(3.5 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \times 7.5 = 3.75 \][/tex]
5. For [tex]\( n = 5 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_5 = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_4 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \left(3.75 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \times 7.75 = 3.875 \][/tex]
6. For [tex]\( n = 6 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_6 = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_5 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \left(3.875 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \times 7.875 = 3.9375 \][/tex]
So, the first six terms of the sequence are:
[tex]\[ \{2, 3, 3.5, 3.75, 3.875, 3.9375\} \][/tex]
### Part b: Proving that [tex]\(a_n < 4\)[/tex] for all [tex]\(n\)[/tex]
We will prove this statement by induction.
Base case:
For [tex]\( n = 1 \)[/tex],
[tex]\[ a_1 = 2 \][/tex]
Clearly, [tex]\( 2 < 4 \)[/tex], so the base case holds.
Inductive step:
Assume [tex]\( a_n < 4 \)[/tex] for some [tex]\( n \)[/tex]. We need to show that [tex]\( a_{n+1} < 4 \)[/tex].
From the recursive definition, we have:
[tex]\[ a_{n+1} = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_n + 4 \right) \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( a_n < 4 \)[/tex], let [tex]\( a_n = 4 - \epsilon \)[/tex], where [tex]\( \epsilon > 0 \)[/tex]. Then,
[tex]\[ a_{n+1} = \frac{1}{2} \left((4 - \epsilon) + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \left(8 - \epsilon \right) = 4 - \frac{\epsilon}{2} \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( \epsilon > 0 \)[/tex], it follows that [tex]\( 4 - \frac{\epsilon}{2} < 4 \)[/tex]. Hence,
[tex]\[ a_{n+1} < 4 \][/tex]
By induction, we have proven that [tex]\( a_n < 4 \)[/tex] for all [tex]\( n \)[/tex].
### Part c: Proving that [tex]\(\{ a_n \}\)[/tex] is a monotonically increasing sequence
We want to show that [tex]\( a_{n+1} \ge a_n \)[/tex] for all [tex]\( n \)[/tex].
Using the recursive definition:
[tex]\[ a_{n+1} = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_n + 4 \right) \][/tex]
Let's examine the difference [tex]\( a_{n+1} - a_n \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_{n+1} - a_n = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_n + 4 \right) - a_n \][/tex]
[tex]\[ = \frac{1}{2} a_n + 2 - a_n \][/tex]
[tex]\[ = 2 - \frac{1}{2} a_n \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( a_n < 4 \)[/tex], let [tex]\( a_n = 4 - \epsilon \)[/tex] where [tex]\( \epsilon > 0 \)[/tex]. Then,
[tex]\[ 2 - \frac{1}{2} a_n = 2 - \frac{1}{2} (4 - \epsilon) = 2 - 2 + \frac{\epsilon}{2} = \frac{\epsilon}{2} \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( \epsilon > 0 \)[/tex], it follows that [tex]\( \frac{\epsilon}{2} > 0 \)[/tex]. Therefore,
[tex]\[ a_{n+1} - a_n = \frac{\epsilon}{2} > 0 \][/tex]
Thus, we have [tex]\( a_{n+1} > a_n \)[/tex], proving that the sequence [tex]\(\{ a_n \}\)[/tex] is monotonically increasing.
### Conclusion
a) The first six terms of the sequence are [tex]\(\{ 2, 3, 3.5, 3.75, 3.875, 3.9375 \}\)[/tex].
b) We proved that [tex]\( a_n < 4 \)[/tex] for all [tex]\( n \)[/tex].
c) We also proved that the sequence [tex]\(\{ a_n \}\)[/tex] is monotonically increasing.
### Part a: Generating the first six terms of the sequence
The sequence is defined as:
[tex]\[ a_1 = 2 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ a_{n+1} = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_n + 4 \right) \][/tex]
Let's calculate the first six terms.
1. For [tex]\( n = 1 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_1 = 2 \][/tex]
2. For [tex]\( n = 2 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_2 = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_1 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \left(2 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \times 6 = 3 \][/tex]
3. For [tex]\( n = 3 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_3 = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_2 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \left(3 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \times 7 = 3.5 \][/tex]
4. For [tex]\( n = 4 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_4 = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_3 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \left(3.5 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \times 7.5 = 3.75 \][/tex]
5. For [tex]\( n = 5 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_5 = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_4 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \left(3.75 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \times 7.75 = 3.875 \][/tex]
6. For [tex]\( n = 6 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_6 = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_5 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \left(3.875 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \times 7.875 = 3.9375 \][/tex]
So, the first six terms of the sequence are:
[tex]\[ \{2, 3, 3.5, 3.75, 3.875, 3.9375\} \][/tex]
### Part b: Proving that [tex]\(a_n < 4\)[/tex] for all [tex]\(n\)[/tex]
We will prove this statement by induction.
Base case:
For [tex]\( n = 1 \)[/tex],
[tex]\[ a_1 = 2 \][/tex]
Clearly, [tex]\( 2 < 4 \)[/tex], so the base case holds.
Inductive step:
Assume [tex]\( a_n < 4 \)[/tex] for some [tex]\( n \)[/tex]. We need to show that [tex]\( a_{n+1} < 4 \)[/tex].
From the recursive definition, we have:
[tex]\[ a_{n+1} = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_n + 4 \right) \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( a_n < 4 \)[/tex], let [tex]\( a_n = 4 - \epsilon \)[/tex], where [tex]\( \epsilon > 0 \)[/tex]. Then,
[tex]\[ a_{n+1} = \frac{1}{2} \left((4 - \epsilon) + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \left(8 - \epsilon \right) = 4 - \frac{\epsilon}{2} \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( \epsilon > 0 \)[/tex], it follows that [tex]\( 4 - \frac{\epsilon}{2} < 4 \)[/tex]. Hence,
[tex]\[ a_{n+1} < 4 \][/tex]
By induction, we have proven that [tex]\( a_n < 4 \)[/tex] for all [tex]\( n \)[/tex].
### Part c: Proving that [tex]\(\{ a_n \}\)[/tex] is a monotonically increasing sequence
We want to show that [tex]\( a_{n+1} \ge a_n \)[/tex] for all [tex]\( n \)[/tex].
Using the recursive definition:
[tex]\[ a_{n+1} = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_n + 4 \right) \][/tex]
Let's examine the difference [tex]\( a_{n+1} - a_n \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_{n+1} - a_n = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_n + 4 \right) - a_n \][/tex]
[tex]\[ = \frac{1}{2} a_n + 2 - a_n \][/tex]
[tex]\[ = 2 - \frac{1}{2} a_n \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( a_n < 4 \)[/tex], let [tex]\( a_n = 4 - \epsilon \)[/tex] where [tex]\( \epsilon > 0 \)[/tex]. Then,
[tex]\[ 2 - \frac{1}{2} a_n = 2 - \frac{1}{2} (4 - \epsilon) = 2 - 2 + \frac{\epsilon}{2} = \frac{\epsilon}{2} \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( \epsilon > 0 \)[/tex], it follows that [tex]\( \frac{\epsilon}{2} > 0 \)[/tex]. Therefore,
[tex]\[ a_{n+1} - a_n = \frac{\epsilon}{2} > 0 \][/tex]
Thus, we have [tex]\( a_{n+1} > a_n \)[/tex], proving that the sequence [tex]\(\{ a_n \}\)[/tex] is monotonically increasing.
### Conclusion
a) The first six terms of the sequence are [tex]\(\{ 2, 3, 3.5, 3.75, 3.875, 3.9375 \}\)[/tex].
b) We proved that [tex]\( a_n < 4 \)[/tex] for all [tex]\( n \)[/tex].
c) We also proved that the sequence [tex]\(\{ a_n \}\)[/tex] is monotonically increasing.
Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thank you for choosing Westonci.ca as your information source. We look forward to your next visit.
