Discover the answers you need at Westonci.ca, a dynamic Q&A platform where knowledge is shared freely by a community of experts. Get quick and reliable answers to your questions from a dedicated community of professionals on our platform. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.
Sagot :
Certainly! Let's solve the problem step-by-step.
### Part a: Generating the first six terms of the sequence
The sequence is defined as:
[tex]\[ a_1 = 2 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ a_{n+1} = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_n + 4 \right) \][/tex]
Let's calculate the first six terms.
1. For [tex]\( n = 1 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_1 = 2 \][/tex]
2. For [tex]\( n = 2 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_2 = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_1 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \left(2 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \times 6 = 3 \][/tex]
3. For [tex]\( n = 3 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_3 = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_2 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \left(3 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \times 7 = 3.5 \][/tex]
4. For [tex]\( n = 4 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_4 = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_3 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \left(3.5 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \times 7.5 = 3.75 \][/tex]
5. For [tex]\( n = 5 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_5 = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_4 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \left(3.75 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \times 7.75 = 3.875 \][/tex]
6. For [tex]\( n = 6 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_6 = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_5 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \left(3.875 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \times 7.875 = 3.9375 \][/tex]
So, the first six terms of the sequence are:
[tex]\[ \{2, 3, 3.5, 3.75, 3.875, 3.9375\} \][/tex]
### Part b: Proving that [tex]\(a_n < 4\)[/tex] for all [tex]\(n\)[/tex]
We will prove this statement by induction.
Base case:
For [tex]\( n = 1 \)[/tex],
[tex]\[ a_1 = 2 \][/tex]
Clearly, [tex]\( 2 < 4 \)[/tex], so the base case holds.
Inductive step:
Assume [tex]\( a_n < 4 \)[/tex] for some [tex]\( n \)[/tex]. We need to show that [tex]\( a_{n+1} < 4 \)[/tex].
From the recursive definition, we have:
[tex]\[ a_{n+1} = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_n + 4 \right) \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( a_n < 4 \)[/tex], let [tex]\( a_n = 4 - \epsilon \)[/tex], where [tex]\( \epsilon > 0 \)[/tex]. Then,
[tex]\[ a_{n+1} = \frac{1}{2} \left((4 - \epsilon) + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \left(8 - \epsilon \right) = 4 - \frac{\epsilon}{2} \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( \epsilon > 0 \)[/tex], it follows that [tex]\( 4 - \frac{\epsilon}{2} < 4 \)[/tex]. Hence,
[tex]\[ a_{n+1} < 4 \][/tex]
By induction, we have proven that [tex]\( a_n < 4 \)[/tex] for all [tex]\( n \)[/tex].
### Part c: Proving that [tex]\(\{ a_n \}\)[/tex] is a monotonically increasing sequence
We want to show that [tex]\( a_{n+1} \ge a_n \)[/tex] for all [tex]\( n \)[/tex].
Using the recursive definition:
[tex]\[ a_{n+1} = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_n + 4 \right) \][/tex]
Let's examine the difference [tex]\( a_{n+1} - a_n \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_{n+1} - a_n = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_n + 4 \right) - a_n \][/tex]
[tex]\[ = \frac{1}{2} a_n + 2 - a_n \][/tex]
[tex]\[ = 2 - \frac{1}{2} a_n \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( a_n < 4 \)[/tex], let [tex]\( a_n = 4 - \epsilon \)[/tex] where [tex]\( \epsilon > 0 \)[/tex]. Then,
[tex]\[ 2 - \frac{1}{2} a_n = 2 - \frac{1}{2} (4 - \epsilon) = 2 - 2 + \frac{\epsilon}{2} = \frac{\epsilon}{2} \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( \epsilon > 0 \)[/tex], it follows that [tex]\( \frac{\epsilon}{2} > 0 \)[/tex]. Therefore,
[tex]\[ a_{n+1} - a_n = \frac{\epsilon}{2} > 0 \][/tex]
Thus, we have [tex]\( a_{n+1} > a_n \)[/tex], proving that the sequence [tex]\(\{ a_n \}\)[/tex] is monotonically increasing.
### Conclusion
a) The first six terms of the sequence are [tex]\(\{ 2, 3, 3.5, 3.75, 3.875, 3.9375 \}\)[/tex].
b) We proved that [tex]\( a_n < 4 \)[/tex] for all [tex]\( n \)[/tex].
c) We also proved that the sequence [tex]\(\{ a_n \}\)[/tex] is monotonically increasing.
### Part a: Generating the first six terms of the sequence
The sequence is defined as:
[tex]\[ a_1 = 2 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ a_{n+1} = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_n + 4 \right) \][/tex]
Let's calculate the first six terms.
1. For [tex]\( n = 1 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_1 = 2 \][/tex]
2. For [tex]\( n = 2 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_2 = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_1 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \left(2 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \times 6 = 3 \][/tex]
3. For [tex]\( n = 3 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_3 = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_2 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \left(3 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \times 7 = 3.5 \][/tex]
4. For [tex]\( n = 4 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_4 = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_3 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \left(3.5 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \times 7.5 = 3.75 \][/tex]
5. For [tex]\( n = 5 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_5 = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_4 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \left(3.75 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \times 7.75 = 3.875 \][/tex]
6. For [tex]\( n = 6 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_6 = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_5 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \left(3.875 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \times 7.875 = 3.9375 \][/tex]
So, the first six terms of the sequence are:
[tex]\[ \{2, 3, 3.5, 3.75, 3.875, 3.9375\} \][/tex]
### Part b: Proving that [tex]\(a_n < 4\)[/tex] for all [tex]\(n\)[/tex]
We will prove this statement by induction.
Base case:
For [tex]\( n = 1 \)[/tex],
[tex]\[ a_1 = 2 \][/tex]
Clearly, [tex]\( 2 < 4 \)[/tex], so the base case holds.
Inductive step:
Assume [tex]\( a_n < 4 \)[/tex] for some [tex]\( n \)[/tex]. We need to show that [tex]\( a_{n+1} < 4 \)[/tex].
From the recursive definition, we have:
[tex]\[ a_{n+1} = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_n + 4 \right) \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( a_n < 4 \)[/tex], let [tex]\( a_n = 4 - \epsilon \)[/tex], where [tex]\( \epsilon > 0 \)[/tex]. Then,
[tex]\[ a_{n+1} = \frac{1}{2} \left((4 - \epsilon) + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \left(8 - \epsilon \right) = 4 - \frac{\epsilon}{2} \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( \epsilon > 0 \)[/tex], it follows that [tex]\( 4 - \frac{\epsilon}{2} < 4 \)[/tex]. Hence,
[tex]\[ a_{n+1} < 4 \][/tex]
By induction, we have proven that [tex]\( a_n < 4 \)[/tex] for all [tex]\( n \)[/tex].
### Part c: Proving that [tex]\(\{ a_n \}\)[/tex] is a monotonically increasing sequence
We want to show that [tex]\( a_{n+1} \ge a_n \)[/tex] for all [tex]\( n \)[/tex].
Using the recursive definition:
[tex]\[ a_{n+1} = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_n + 4 \right) \][/tex]
Let's examine the difference [tex]\( a_{n+1} - a_n \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_{n+1} - a_n = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_n + 4 \right) - a_n \][/tex]
[tex]\[ = \frac{1}{2} a_n + 2 - a_n \][/tex]
[tex]\[ = 2 - \frac{1}{2} a_n \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( a_n < 4 \)[/tex], let [tex]\( a_n = 4 - \epsilon \)[/tex] where [tex]\( \epsilon > 0 \)[/tex]. Then,
[tex]\[ 2 - \frac{1}{2} a_n = 2 - \frac{1}{2} (4 - \epsilon) = 2 - 2 + \frac{\epsilon}{2} = \frac{\epsilon}{2} \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( \epsilon > 0 \)[/tex], it follows that [tex]\( \frac{\epsilon}{2} > 0 \)[/tex]. Therefore,
[tex]\[ a_{n+1} - a_n = \frac{\epsilon}{2} > 0 \][/tex]
Thus, we have [tex]\( a_{n+1} > a_n \)[/tex], proving that the sequence [tex]\(\{ a_n \}\)[/tex] is monotonically increasing.
### Conclusion
a) The first six terms of the sequence are [tex]\(\{ 2, 3, 3.5, 3.75, 3.875, 3.9375 \}\)[/tex].
b) We proved that [tex]\( a_n < 4 \)[/tex] for all [tex]\( n \)[/tex].
c) We also proved that the sequence [tex]\(\{ a_n \}\)[/tex] is monotonically increasing.
Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca. Stay informed by coming back for more detailed answers.
