Welcome to Westonci.ca, where finding answers to your questions is made simple by our community of experts. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a knowledgeable network of professionals. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.
Sagot :
Certainly! Let's solve the problem step-by-step.
### Part a: Generating the first six terms of the sequence
The sequence is defined as:
[tex]\[ a_1 = 2 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ a_{n+1} = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_n + 4 \right) \][/tex]
Let's calculate the first six terms.
1. For [tex]\( n = 1 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_1 = 2 \][/tex]
2. For [tex]\( n = 2 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_2 = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_1 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \left(2 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \times 6 = 3 \][/tex]
3. For [tex]\( n = 3 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_3 = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_2 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \left(3 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \times 7 = 3.5 \][/tex]
4. For [tex]\( n = 4 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_4 = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_3 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \left(3.5 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \times 7.5 = 3.75 \][/tex]
5. For [tex]\( n = 5 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_5 = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_4 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \left(3.75 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \times 7.75 = 3.875 \][/tex]
6. For [tex]\( n = 6 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_6 = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_5 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \left(3.875 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \times 7.875 = 3.9375 \][/tex]
So, the first six terms of the sequence are:
[tex]\[ \{2, 3, 3.5, 3.75, 3.875, 3.9375\} \][/tex]
### Part b: Proving that [tex]\(a_n < 4\)[/tex] for all [tex]\(n\)[/tex]
We will prove this statement by induction.
Base case:
For [tex]\( n = 1 \)[/tex],
[tex]\[ a_1 = 2 \][/tex]
Clearly, [tex]\( 2 < 4 \)[/tex], so the base case holds.
Inductive step:
Assume [tex]\( a_n < 4 \)[/tex] for some [tex]\( n \)[/tex]. We need to show that [tex]\( a_{n+1} < 4 \)[/tex].
From the recursive definition, we have:
[tex]\[ a_{n+1} = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_n + 4 \right) \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( a_n < 4 \)[/tex], let [tex]\( a_n = 4 - \epsilon \)[/tex], where [tex]\( \epsilon > 0 \)[/tex]. Then,
[tex]\[ a_{n+1} = \frac{1}{2} \left((4 - \epsilon) + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \left(8 - \epsilon \right) = 4 - \frac{\epsilon}{2} \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( \epsilon > 0 \)[/tex], it follows that [tex]\( 4 - \frac{\epsilon}{2} < 4 \)[/tex]. Hence,
[tex]\[ a_{n+1} < 4 \][/tex]
By induction, we have proven that [tex]\( a_n < 4 \)[/tex] for all [tex]\( n \)[/tex].
### Part c: Proving that [tex]\(\{ a_n \}\)[/tex] is a monotonically increasing sequence
We want to show that [tex]\( a_{n+1} \ge a_n \)[/tex] for all [tex]\( n \)[/tex].
Using the recursive definition:
[tex]\[ a_{n+1} = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_n + 4 \right) \][/tex]
Let's examine the difference [tex]\( a_{n+1} - a_n \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_{n+1} - a_n = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_n + 4 \right) - a_n \][/tex]
[tex]\[ = \frac{1}{2} a_n + 2 - a_n \][/tex]
[tex]\[ = 2 - \frac{1}{2} a_n \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( a_n < 4 \)[/tex], let [tex]\( a_n = 4 - \epsilon \)[/tex] where [tex]\( \epsilon > 0 \)[/tex]. Then,
[tex]\[ 2 - \frac{1}{2} a_n = 2 - \frac{1}{2} (4 - \epsilon) = 2 - 2 + \frac{\epsilon}{2} = \frac{\epsilon}{2} \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( \epsilon > 0 \)[/tex], it follows that [tex]\( \frac{\epsilon}{2} > 0 \)[/tex]. Therefore,
[tex]\[ a_{n+1} - a_n = \frac{\epsilon}{2} > 0 \][/tex]
Thus, we have [tex]\( a_{n+1} > a_n \)[/tex], proving that the sequence [tex]\(\{ a_n \}\)[/tex] is monotonically increasing.
### Conclusion
a) The first six terms of the sequence are [tex]\(\{ 2, 3, 3.5, 3.75, 3.875, 3.9375 \}\)[/tex].
b) We proved that [tex]\( a_n < 4 \)[/tex] for all [tex]\( n \)[/tex].
c) We also proved that the sequence [tex]\(\{ a_n \}\)[/tex] is monotonically increasing.
### Part a: Generating the first six terms of the sequence
The sequence is defined as:
[tex]\[ a_1 = 2 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ a_{n+1} = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_n + 4 \right) \][/tex]
Let's calculate the first six terms.
1. For [tex]\( n = 1 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_1 = 2 \][/tex]
2. For [tex]\( n = 2 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_2 = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_1 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \left(2 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \times 6 = 3 \][/tex]
3. For [tex]\( n = 3 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_3 = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_2 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \left(3 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \times 7 = 3.5 \][/tex]
4. For [tex]\( n = 4 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_4 = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_3 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \left(3.5 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \times 7.5 = 3.75 \][/tex]
5. For [tex]\( n = 5 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_5 = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_4 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \left(3.75 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \times 7.75 = 3.875 \][/tex]
6. For [tex]\( n = 6 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_6 = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_5 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \left(3.875 + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \times 7.875 = 3.9375 \][/tex]
So, the first six terms of the sequence are:
[tex]\[ \{2, 3, 3.5, 3.75, 3.875, 3.9375\} \][/tex]
### Part b: Proving that [tex]\(a_n < 4\)[/tex] for all [tex]\(n\)[/tex]
We will prove this statement by induction.
Base case:
For [tex]\( n = 1 \)[/tex],
[tex]\[ a_1 = 2 \][/tex]
Clearly, [tex]\( 2 < 4 \)[/tex], so the base case holds.
Inductive step:
Assume [tex]\( a_n < 4 \)[/tex] for some [tex]\( n \)[/tex]. We need to show that [tex]\( a_{n+1} < 4 \)[/tex].
From the recursive definition, we have:
[tex]\[ a_{n+1} = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_n + 4 \right) \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( a_n < 4 \)[/tex], let [tex]\( a_n = 4 - \epsilon \)[/tex], where [tex]\( \epsilon > 0 \)[/tex]. Then,
[tex]\[ a_{n+1} = \frac{1}{2} \left((4 - \epsilon) + 4 \right) = \frac{1}{2} \left(8 - \epsilon \right) = 4 - \frac{\epsilon}{2} \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( \epsilon > 0 \)[/tex], it follows that [tex]\( 4 - \frac{\epsilon}{2} < 4 \)[/tex]. Hence,
[tex]\[ a_{n+1} < 4 \][/tex]
By induction, we have proven that [tex]\( a_n < 4 \)[/tex] for all [tex]\( n \)[/tex].
### Part c: Proving that [tex]\(\{ a_n \}\)[/tex] is a monotonically increasing sequence
We want to show that [tex]\( a_{n+1} \ge a_n \)[/tex] for all [tex]\( n \)[/tex].
Using the recursive definition:
[tex]\[ a_{n+1} = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_n + 4 \right) \][/tex]
Let's examine the difference [tex]\( a_{n+1} - a_n \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_{n+1} - a_n = \frac{1}{2} \left(a_n + 4 \right) - a_n \][/tex]
[tex]\[ = \frac{1}{2} a_n + 2 - a_n \][/tex]
[tex]\[ = 2 - \frac{1}{2} a_n \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( a_n < 4 \)[/tex], let [tex]\( a_n = 4 - \epsilon \)[/tex] where [tex]\( \epsilon > 0 \)[/tex]. Then,
[tex]\[ 2 - \frac{1}{2} a_n = 2 - \frac{1}{2} (4 - \epsilon) = 2 - 2 + \frac{\epsilon}{2} = \frac{\epsilon}{2} \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( \epsilon > 0 \)[/tex], it follows that [tex]\( \frac{\epsilon}{2} > 0 \)[/tex]. Therefore,
[tex]\[ a_{n+1} - a_n = \frac{\epsilon}{2} > 0 \][/tex]
Thus, we have [tex]\( a_{n+1} > a_n \)[/tex], proving that the sequence [tex]\(\{ a_n \}\)[/tex] is monotonically increasing.
### Conclusion
a) The first six terms of the sequence are [tex]\(\{ 2, 3, 3.5, 3.75, 3.875, 3.9375 \}\)[/tex].
b) We proved that [tex]\( a_n < 4 \)[/tex] for all [tex]\( n \)[/tex].
c) We also proved that the sequence [tex]\(\{ a_n \}\)[/tex] is monotonically increasing.
We hope this information was helpful. Feel free to return anytime for more answers to your questions and concerns. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Thank you for using Westonci.ca. Come back for more in-depth answers to all your queries.
