At Westonci.ca, we provide reliable answers to your questions from a community of experts. Start exploring today! Discover comprehensive answers to your questions from knowledgeable professionals on our user-friendly platform. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.
Sagot :
Given the problem, we know that the cost per day to care for each dog is [tex]$ \$[/tex]6$. To model this situation, we need to verify which table matches the equation [tex]\( y = 6x \)[/tex], where [tex]\( y \)[/tex] represents the total cost of caring for a single dog for [tex]\( x \)[/tex] days.
### Step-by-Step Solution:
1. Evaluate the first table:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline x & y \\ \hline 12 & 6 \\ \hline 15 & 9 \\ \hline 18 & 12 \\ \hline \end{array} \][/tex]
For each entry, check if [tex]\( y = 6x \)[/tex]:
- For (12, 6): [tex]\( 6 \neq 6 \times 12 \)[/tex] (which simplifies to [tex]\( 6 \neq 72 \)[/tex]) => False
- For (15, 9): [tex]\( 9 \neq 6 \times 15 \)[/tex] (which simplifies to [tex]\( 9 \neq 90 \)[/tex]) => False
- For (18, 12): [tex]\( 12 \neq 6 \times 18 \)[/tex] (which simplifies to [tex]\( 12 \neq 108 \)[/tex]) => False
Thus, the first table does not model the situation.
2. Evaluate the second table:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline x & y \\ \hline 6 & 12 \\ \hline 9 & 15 \\ \hline 12 & 18 \\ \hline \end{array} \][/tex]
For each entry, check if [tex]\( y = 6x \)[/tex]:
- For (6, 12): [tex]\( 12 \neq 6 \times 6 \)[/tex] (which simplifies to [tex]\( 12 \neq 36 \)[/tex]) => False
- For (9, 15): [tex]\( 15 \neq 6 \times 9 \)[/tex] (which simplifies to [tex]\( 15 \neq 54 \)[/tex]) => False
- For (12, 18): [tex]\( 18 \neq 6 \times 12 \)[/tex] (which simplifies to [tex]\( 18 \neq 72 \)[/tex]) => False
Thus, the second table does not model the situation.
3. Evaluate the third table:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline x & y \\ \hline 36 & 6 \\ \hline 54 & 9 \\ \hline 72 & 12 \\ \hline \end{array} \][/tex]
For each entry, check if [tex]\( y = 6x \)[/tex]:
- For (36, 6): [tex]\( 6 \neq 6 \times 36 \)[/tex] (which simplifies to [tex]\( 6 \neq 216 \)[/tex]) => False
- For (54, 9): [tex]\( 9 \neq 6 \times 54 \)[/tex] (which simplifies to [tex]\( 9 \neq 324 \)[/tex]) => False
- For (72, 12): [tex]\( 12 \neq 6 \times 72 \)[/tex] (which simplifies to [tex]\( 12 \neq 432 \)[/tex]) => False
Thus, the third table does not model the situation.
4. Evaluate the fourth table:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline x & y \\ \hline 6 & 36 \\ \hline 9 & 54 \\ \hline 12 & 72 \\ \hline \end{array} \][/tex]
For each entry, check if [tex]\( y = 6x \)[/tex]:
- For (6, 36): [tex]\( 36 = 6 \times 6 \)[/tex] => True
- For (9, 54): [tex]\( 54 = 6 \times 9 \)[/tex] => True
- For (12, 72): [tex]\( 72 = 6 \times 12 \)[/tex] => True
Thus, the fourth table does model the situation.
### Conclusion:
The fourth table, which consists of the pairs [tex]\((6, 36)\)[/tex], [tex]\((9, 54)\)[/tex], and [tex]\((12, 72)\)[/tex], correctly models the relationship where [tex]\( y = 6x \)[/tex]. Therefore, the valid table is:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline x & y \\ \hline 6 & 36 \\ \hline 9 & 54 \\ \hline 12 & 72 \\ \hline \end{array} \][/tex]
### Step-by-Step Solution:
1. Evaluate the first table:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline x & y \\ \hline 12 & 6 \\ \hline 15 & 9 \\ \hline 18 & 12 \\ \hline \end{array} \][/tex]
For each entry, check if [tex]\( y = 6x \)[/tex]:
- For (12, 6): [tex]\( 6 \neq 6 \times 12 \)[/tex] (which simplifies to [tex]\( 6 \neq 72 \)[/tex]) => False
- For (15, 9): [tex]\( 9 \neq 6 \times 15 \)[/tex] (which simplifies to [tex]\( 9 \neq 90 \)[/tex]) => False
- For (18, 12): [tex]\( 12 \neq 6 \times 18 \)[/tex] (which simplifies to [tex]\( 12 \neq 108 \)[/tex]) => False
Thus, the first table does not model the situation.
2. Evaluate the second table:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline x & y \\ \hline 6 & 12 \\ \hline 9 & 15 \\ \hline 12 & 18 \\ \hline \end{array} \][/tex]
For each entry, check if [tex]\( y = 6x \)[/tex]:
- For (6, 12): [tex]\( 12 \neq 6 \times 6 \)[/tex] (which simplifies to [tex]\( 12 \neq 36 \)[/tex]) => False
- For (9, 15): [tex]\( 15 \neq 6 \times 9 \)[/tex] (which simplifies to [tex]\( 15 \neq 54 \)[/tex]) => False
- For (12, 18): [tex]\( 18 \neq 6 \times 12 \)[/tex] (which simplifies to [tex]\( 18 \neq 72 \)[/tex]) => False
Thus, the second table does not model the situation.
3. Evaluate the third table:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline x & y \\ \hline 36 & 6 \\ \hline 54 & 9 \\ \hline 72 & 12 \\ \hline \end{array} \][/tex]
For each entry, check if [tex]\( y = 6x \)[/tex]:
- For (36, 6): [tex]\( 6 \neq 6 \times 36 \)[/tex] (which simplifies to [tex]\( 6 \neq 216 \)[/tex]) => False
- For (54, 9): [tex]\( 9 \neq 6 \times 54 \)[/tex] (which simplifies to [tex]\( 9 \neq 324 \)[/tex]) => False
- For (72, 12): [tex]\( 12 \neq 6 \times 72 \)[/tex] (which simplifies to [tex]\( 12 \neq 432 \)[/tex]) => False
Thus, the third table does not model the situation.
4. Evaluate the fourth table:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline x & y \\ \hline 6 & 36 \\ \hline 9 & 54 \\ \hline 12 & 72 \\ \hline \end{array} \][/tex]
For each entry, check if [tex]\( y = 6x \)[/tex]:
- For (6, 36): [tex]\( 36 = 6 \times 6 \)[/tex] => True
- For (9, 54): [tex]\( 54 = 6 \times 9 \)[/tex] => True
- For (12, 72): [tex]\( 72 = 6 \times 12 \)[/tex] => True
Thus, the fourth table does model the situation.
### Conclusion:
The fourth table, which consists of the pairs [tex]\((6, 36)\)[/tex], [tex]\((9, 54)\)[/tex], and [tex]\((12, 72)\)[/tex], correctly models the relationship where [tex]\( y = 6x \)[/tex]. Therefore, the valid table is:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline x & y \\ \hline 6 & 36 \\ \hline 9 & 54 \\ \hline 12 & 72 \\ \hline \end{array} \][/tex]
We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. We're glad you visited Westonci.ca. Return anytime for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.