Discover answers to your most pressing questions at Westonci.ca, the ultimate Q&A platform that connects you with expert solutions. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform.
Sagot :
Final answer:
De Morgan's laws explain the relationship between logical operators when negated, showing how ‘and’ and ‘or’ statements can be equivalent. The equivalent statement to the given scenario is that both frogs and fish do not have fins.
Explanation:
De Morgan's laws are a set of rules in logic that explain the relationship between the logical operators 'and' and 'or' when negated. One of the laws states that the negation of 'A and B' is equivalent to 'not A or not B'.
In the context of the given statement about frogs and fish having fins, the equivalent statement using De Morgan's laws is B. Frogs do not have fins and fish do not have fins. This aligns with the principle that the negation of 'both A and B' corresponds to 'not A or not B'.
Learn more about De Morgan's laws here:
https://brainly.com/question/37945283
Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. We're dedicated to helping you find the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Don't hesitate to return for more.