Explore Westonci.ca, the leading Q&A site where experts provide accurate and helpful answers to all your questions. Get detailed answers to your questions from a community of experts dedicated to providing accurate information. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform.
Sagot :
Final answer:
De Morgan's laws explain the relationship between logical operators when negated, showing how ‘and’ and ‘or’ statements can be equivalent. The equivalent statement to the given scenario is that both frogs and fish do not have fins.
Explanation:
De Morgan's laws are a set of rules in logic that explain the relationship between the logical operators 'and' and 'or' when negated. One of the laws states that the negation of 'A and B' is equivalent to 'not A or not B'.
In the context of the given statement about frogs and fish having fins, the equivalent statement using De Morgan's laws is B. Frogs do not have fins and fish do not have fins. This aligns with the principle that the negation of 'both A and B' corresponds to 'not A or not B'.
Learn more about De Morgan's laws here:
https://brainly.com/question/37945283
We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Discover more at Westonci.ca. Return for the latest expert answers and updates on various topics.