Westonci.ca is your go-to source for answers, with a community ready to provide accurate and timely information. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.
Sagot :
Final answer:
De Morgan's laws explain the relationship between logical operators when negated, showing how ‘and’ and ‘or’ statements can be equivalent. The equivalent statement to the given scenario is that both frogs and fish do not have fins.
Explanation:
De Morgan's laws are a set of rules in logic that explain the relationship between the logical operators 'and' and 'or' when negated. One of the laws states that the negation of 'A and B' is equivalent to 'not A or not B'.
In the context of the given statement about frogs and fish having fins, the equivalent statement using De Morgan's laws is B. Frogs do not have fins and fish do not have fins. This aligns with the principle that the negation of 'both A and B' corresponds to 'not A or not B'.
Learn more about De Morgan's laws here:
https://brainly.com/question/37945283
We appreciate your time on our site. Don't hesitate to return whenever you have more questions or need further clarification. We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Your questions are important to us at Westonci.ca. Visit again for expert answers and reliable information.