Welcome to Westonci.ca, the place where your questions find answers from a community of knowledgeable experts. Get detailed and precise answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.
Sagot :
Final answer:
De Morgan's laws explain the relationship between logical operators when negated, showing how ‘and’ and ‘or’ statements can be equivalent. The equivalent statement to the given scenario is that both frogs and fish do not have fins.
Explanation:
De Morgan's laws are a set of rules in logic that explain the relationship between the logical operators 'and' and 'or' when negated. One of the laws states that the negation of 'A and B' is equivalent to 'not A or not B'.
In the context of the given statement about frogs and fish having fins, the equivalent statement using De Morgan's laws is B. Frogs do not have fins and fish do not have fins. This aligns with the principle that the negation of 'both A and B' corresponds to 'not A or not B'.
Learn more about De Morgan's laws here:
https://brainly.com/question/37945283
Visit us again for up-to-date and reliable answers. We're always ready to assist you with your informational needs. We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. We're glad you visited Westonci.ca. Return anytime for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.