Westonci.ca connects you with experts who provide insightful answers to your questions. Join us today and start learning! Find reliable answers to your questions from a wide community of knowledgeable experts on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.
Sagot :
Final answer:
Judicial activism involves actively reviewing and potentially overturning decisions by other branches of government to protect individual rights. Judicial restraint, on the other hand, suggests judges should defer decisions to elected branches and focus on a narrow interpretation of the law.
Explanation:
Judicial activism is a judicial philosophy where judges actively review and potentially overturn decisions or actions by other branches of government, aiming to protect individual rights and liberties. This approach involves judges taking a vigorous or active role in interpreting the Constitution. In contrast, judicial restraint advocates for judges to defer decisions to elected branches and focus on a narrower interpretation of the law.
Learn more about Judicial activism and judicial restraint here:
https://brainly.com/question/29545866
Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. Find reliable answers at Westonci.ca. Visit us again for the latest updates and expert advice.