Answered

Discover the answers you need at Westonci.ca, a dynamic Q&A platform where knowledge is shared freely by a community of experts. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in various areas. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.

A justice that agrees with the majority opinion but for different reasons may write a

Select one:

a. differing opinion.
b. concurrent opinion.
c. dissenting opinion.
d. circulatory opinion.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

A concurring opinion agrees with the majority but for different reasons, and a dissenting opinion disagrees with the majority decision.


Explanation:

A concurring opinion is an opinion written by a justice who agrees with the Court's majority opinion but has different reasons for doing so. It allows the justice to provide additional insights or perspectives on the case despite agreeing with the outcome.


For example, if the majority opinion upholds a law based on constitutional grounds, a justice writing a concurring opinion might agree with the decision but base their support on a different legal theory or interpretation.


In contrast, a dissenting opinion is when a justice disagrees with the majority decision and explains their rationale for opposing it, which can influence future legal interpretations and decisions.


Learn more about Concurring and Dissenting Opinions in Legal System here:

https://brainly.com/question/41604972


We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. We're dedicated to helping you find the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Don't hesitate to return for more.