Welcome to Westonci.ca, your go-to destination for finding answers to all your questions. Join our expert community today! Explore in-depth answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts across different fields. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts.
Sagot :
To address the question, we need to go through the steps of the hypothesis testing method for comparing two proportions. Let's do this step-by-step.
### Step 1: State the Hypotheses
We are testing the claim that men and women have equal success in challenging calls. This sets up our hypotheses as follows:
- Null Hypothesis ([tex]\(H_0\)[/tex]): [tex]\( p_1 = p_2 \)[/tex]
- Alternative Hypothesis ([tex]\(H_1\)[/tex]): [tex]\( p_1 \neq p_2 \)[/tex]
From the provided options, the correct hypotheses setup is:
C. [tex]\( H_0: p_1 = p_2 \)[/tex] and [tex]\(H_1: p_1 \neq p_2\)[/tex]
### Step 2: Calculate the Sample Proportions
We have the following data:
- Men: [tex]\( n_1 = 1420 \)[/tex], [tex]\( x_1 = 416 \)[/tex]
- Women: [tex]\( n_2 = 739 \)[/tex], [tex]\( x_2 = 215 \)[/tex]
The sample proportions are calculated as:
[tex]\[ \hat{p}_1 = \frac{x_1}{n_1} = \frac{416}{1420} \approx 0.29296 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ \hat{p}_2 = \frac{x_2}{n_2} = \frac{215}{739} \approx 0.29093 \][/tex]
### Step 3: Calculate the Combined Proportion
The combined proportion [tex]\(\hat{p}\)[/tex] is calculated as:
[tex]\[ \hat{p} = \frac{x_1 + x_2}{n_1 + n_2} = \frac{416 + 215}{1420 + 739} \approx 0.29226 \][/tex]
### Step 4: Calculate the Standard Error
The standard error (SE) for the difference in proportions is calculated using the combined proportion:
[tex]\[ SE = \sqrt{\hat{p}(1 - \hat{p}) \left(\frac{1}{n_1} + \frac{1}{n_2}\right)} \approx \sqrt{0.29226(1 - 0.29226) \left(\frac{1}{1420} + \frac{1}{739}\right)} \approx 0.02063 \][/tex]
### Step 5: Calculate the Test Statistic
The test statistic (z) for the difference in proportions is:
[tex]\[ z = \frac{\hat{p}_1 - \hat{p}_2}{SE} \approx \frac{0.29296 - 0.29093}{0.02063} \approx 0.098 \][/tex]
### Step 6: Determine the P-value
For a two-tailed test, the p-value is calculated as:
[tex]\[ p\text{-value} = 2 \times (1 - \Phi(|z|)) \][/tex]
Given our test statistic [tex]\( z \approx 0.098 \)[/tex], the corresponding p-value is approximately [tex]\( 0.9218 \)[/tex].
### Step 7: Conclusion
At a [tex]\( \alpha = 0.05 \)[/tex] significance level, we compare the p-value with [tex]\( \alpha \)[/tex]:
- If [tex]\( p\text{-value} < \alpha \)[/tex], we reject [tex]\( H_0 \)[/tex].
- If [tex]\( p\text{-value} \geq \alpha \)[/tex], we fail to reject [tex]\( H_0 \)[/tex].
Since [tex]\( p\text{-value} \approx 0.9218 \)[/tex] is much greater than [tex]\( 0.05 \)[/tex], we fail to reject the null hypothesis. This means that there is not enough evidence to suggest that the success rates of men and women in challenging referee calls are different.
### Summary
- Null Hypothesis ([tex]\(H_0\)[/tex]): [tex]\( p_1 = p_2 \)[/tex]
- Alternative Hypothesis ([tex]\(H_1\)[/tex]): [tex]\( p_1 \neq p_2 \)[/tex]
- Test Statistic ([tex]\(z\)[/tex]): [tex]\(\boxed{0.10}\)[/tex]
Thus, we conclude that the success rates for men and women in challenging calls are statistically equal in this context.
### Step 1: State the Hypotheses
We are testing the claim that men and women have equal success in challenging calls. This sets up our hypotheses as follows:
- Null Hypothesis ([tex]\(H_0\)[/tex]): [tex]\( p_1 = p_2 \)[/tex]
- Alternative Hypothesis ([tex]\(H_1\)[/tex]): [tex]\( p_1 \neq p_2 \)[/tex]
From the provided options, the correct hypotheses setup is:
C. [tex]\( H_0: p_1 = p_2 \)[/tex] and [tex]\(H_1: p_1 \neq p_2\)[/tex]
### Step 2: Calculate the Sample Proportions
We have the following data:
- Men: [tex]\( n_1 = 1420 \)[/tex], [tex]\( x_1 = 416 \)[/tex]
- Women: [tex]\( n_2 = 739 \)[/tex], [tex]\( x_2 = 215 \)[/tex]
The sample proportions are calculated as:
[tex]\[ \hat{p}_1 = \frac{x_1}{n_1} = \frac{416}{1420} \approx 0.29296 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ \hat{p}_2 = \frac{x_2}{n_2} = \frac{215}{739} \approx 0.29093 \][/tex]
### Step 3: Calculate the Combined Proportion
The combined proportion [tex]\(\hat{p}\)[/tex] is calculated as:
[tex]\[ \hat{p} = \frac{x_1 + x_2}{n_1 + n_2} = \frac{416 + 215}{1420 + 739} \approx 0.29226 \][/tex]
### Step 4: Calculate the Standard Error
The standard error (SE) for the difference in proportions is calculated using the combined proportion:
[tex]\[ SE = \sqrt{\hat{p}(1 - \hat{p}) \left(\frac{1}{n_1} + \frac{1}{n_2}\right)} \approx \sqrt{0.29226(1 - 0.29226) \left(\frac{1}{1420} + \frac{1}{739}\right)} \approx 0.02063 \][/tex]
### Step 5: Calculate the Test Statistic
The test statistic (z) for the difference in proportions is:
[tex]\[ z = \frac{\hat{p}_1 - \hat{p}_2}{SE} \approx \frac{0.29296 - 0.29093}{0.02063} \approx 0.098 \][/tex]
### Step 6: Determine the P-value
For a two-tailed test, the p-value is calculated as:
[tex]\[ p\text{-value} = 2 \times (1 - \Phi(|z|)) \][/tex]
Given our test statistic [tex]\( z \approx 0.098 \)[/tex], the corresponding p-value is approximately [tex]\( 0.9218 \)[/tex].
### Step 7: Conclusion
At a [tex]\( \alpha = 0.05 \)[/tex] significance level, we compare the p-value with [tex]\( \alpha \)[/tex]:
- If [tex]\( p\text{-value} < \alpha \)[/tex], we reject [tex]\( H_0 \)[/tex].
- If [tex]\( p\text{-value} \geq \alpha \)[/tex], we fail to reject [tex]\( H_0 \)[/tex].
Since [tex]\( p\text{-value} \approx 0.9218 \)[/tex] is much greater than [tex]\( 0.05 \)[/tex], we fail to reject the null hypothesis. This means that there is not enough evidence to suggest that the success rates of men and women in challenging referee calls are different.
### Summary
- Null Hypothesis ([tex]\(H_0\)[/tex]): [tex]\( p_1 = p_2 \)[/tex]
- Alternative Hypothesis ([tex]\(H_1\)[/tex]): [tex]\( p_1 \neq p_2 \)[/tex]
- Test Statistic ([tex]\(z\)[/tex]): [tex]\(\boxed{0.10}\)[/tex]
Thus, we conclude that the success rates for men and women in challenging calls are statistically equal in this context.
Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Discover more at Westonci.ca. Return for the latest expert answers and updates on various topics.
