At Westonci.ca, we make it easy to get the answers you need from a community of informed and experienced contributors. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals.
Sagot :
To address the question, we need to go through the steps of the hypothesis testing method for comparing two proportions. Let's do this step-by-step.
### Step 1: State the Hypotheses
We are testing the claim that men and women have equal success in challenging calls. This sets up our hypotheses as follows:
- Null Hypothesis ([tex]\(H_0\)[/tex]): [tex]\( p_1 = p_2 \)[/tex]
- Alternative Hypothesis ([tex]\(H_1\)[/tex]): [tex]\( p_1 \neq p_2 \)[/tex]
From the provided options, the correct hypotheses setup is:
C. [tex]\( H_0: p_1 = p_2 \)[/tex] and [tex]\(H_1: p_1 \neq p_2\)[/tex]
### Step 2: Calculate the Sample Proportions
We have the following data:
- Men: [tex]\( n_1 = 1420 \)[/tex], [tex]\( x_1 = 416 \)[/tex]
- Women: [tex]\( n_2 = 739 \)[/tex], [tex]\( x_2 = 215 \)[/tex]
The sample proportions are calculated as:
[tex]\[ \hat{p}_1 = \frac{x_1}{n_1} = \frac{416}{1420} \approx 0.29296 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ \hat{p}_2 = \frac{x_2}{n_2} = \frac{215}{739} \approx 0.29093 \][/tex]
### Step 3: Calculate the Combined Proportion
The combined proportion [tex]\(\hat{p}\)[/tex] is calculated as:
[tex]\[ \hat{p} = \frac{x_1 + x_2}{n_1 + n_2} = \frac{416 + 215}{1420 + 739} \approx 0.29226 \][/tex]
### Step 4: Calculate the Standard Error
The standard error (SE) for the difference in proportions is calculated using the combined proportion:
[tex]\[ SE = \sqrt{\hat{p}(1 - \hat{p}) \left(\frac{1}{n_1} + \frac{1}{n_2}\right)} \approx \sqrt{0.29226(1 - 0.29226) \left(\frac{1}{1420} + \frac{1}{739}\right)} \approx 0.02063 \][/tex]
### Step 5: Calculate the Test Statistic
The test statistic (z) for the difference in proportions is:
[tex]\[ z = \frac{\hat{p}_1 - \hat{p}_2}{SE} \approx \frac{0.29296 - 0.29093}{0.02063} \approx 0.098 \][/tex]
### Step 6: Determine the P-value
For a two-tailed test, the p-value is calculated as:
[tex]\[ p\text{-value} = 2 \times (1 - \Phi(|z|)) \][/tex]
Given our test statistic [tex]\( z \approx 0.098 \)[/tex], the corresponding p-value is approximately [tex]\( 0.9218 \)[/tex].
### Step 7: Conclusion
At a [tex]\( \alpha = 0.05 \)[/tex] significance level, we compare the p-value with [tex]\( \alpha \)[/tex]:
- If [tex]\( p\text{-value} < \alpha \)[/tex], we reject [tex]\( H_0 \)[/tex].
- If [tex]\( p\text{-value} \geq \alpha \)[/tex], we fail to reject [tex]\( H_0 \)[/tex].
Since [tex]\( p\text{-value} \approx 0.9218 \)[/tex] is much greater than [tex]\( 0.05 \)[/tex], we fail to reject the null hypothesis. This means that there is not enough evidence to suggest that the success rates of men and women in challenging referee calls are different.
### Summary
- Null Hypothesis ([tex]\(H_0\)[/tex]): [tex]\( p_1 = p_2 \)[/tex]
- Alternative Hypothesis ([tex]\(H_1\)[/tex]): [tex]\( p_1 \neq p_2 \)[/tex]
- Test Statistic ([tex]\(z\)[/tex]): [tex]\(\boxed{0.10}\)[/tex]
Thus, we conclude that the success rates for men and women in challenging calls are statistically equal in this context.
### Step 1: State the Hypotheses
We are testing the claim that men and women have equal success in challenging calls. This sets up our hypotheses as follows:
- Null Hypothesis ([tex]\(H_0\)[/tex]): [tex]\( p_1 = p_2 \)[/tex]
- Alternative Hypothesis ([tex]\(H_1\)[/tex]): [tex]\( p_1 \neq p_2 \)[/tex]
From the provided options, the correct hypotheses setup is:
C. [tex]\( H_0: p_1 = p_2 \)[/tex] and [tex]\(H_1: p_1 \neq p_2\)[/tex]
### Step 2: Calculate the Sample Proportions
We have the following data:
- Men: [tex]\( n_1 = 1420 \)[/tex], [tex]\( x_1 = 416 \)[/tex]
- Women: [tex]\( n_2 = 739 \)[/tex], [tex]\( x_2 = 215 \)[/tex]
The sample proportions are calculated as:
[tex]\[ \hat{p}_1 = \frac{x_1}{n_1} = \frac{416}{1420} \approx 0.29296 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ \hat{p}_2 = \frac{x_2}{n_2} = \frac{215}{739} \approx 0.29093 \][/tex]
### Step 3: Calculate the Combined Proportion
The combined proportion [tex]\(\hat{p}\)[/tex] is calculated as:
[tex]\[ \hat{p} = \frac{x_1 + x_2}{n_1 + n_2} = \frac{416 + 215}{1420 + 739} \approx 0.29226 \][/tex]
### Step 4: Calculate the Standard Error
The standard error (SE) for the difference in proportions is calculated using the combined proportion:
[tex]\[ SE = \sqrt{\hat{p}(1 - \hat{p}) \left(\frac{1}{n_1} + \frac{1}{n_2}\right)} \approx \sqrt{0.29226(1 - 0.29226) \left(\frac{1}{1420} + \frac{1}{739}\right)} \approx 0.02063 \][/tex]
### Step 5: Calculate the Test Statistic
The test statistic (z) for the difference in proportions is:
[tex]\[ z = \frac{\hat{p}_1 - \hat{p}_2}{SE} \approx \frac{0.29296 - 0.29093}{0.02063} \approx 0.098 \][/tex]
### Step 6: Determine the P-value
For a two-tailed test, the p-value is calculated as:
[tex]\[ p\text{-value} = 2 \times (1 - \Phi(|z|)) \][/tex]
Given our test statistic [tex]\( z \approx 0.098 \)[/tex], the corresponding p-value is approximately [tex]\( 0.9218 \)[/tex].
### Step 7: Conclusion
At a [tex]\( \alpha = 0.05 \)[/tex] significance level, we compare the p-value with [tex]\( \alpha \)[/tex]:
- If [tex]\( p\text{-value} < \alpha \)[/tex], we reject [tex]\( H_0 \)[/tex].
- If [tex]\( p\text{-value} \geq \alpha \)[/tex], we fail to reject [tex]\( H_0 \)[/tex].
Since [tex]\( p\text{-value} \approx 0.9218 \)[/tex] is much greater than [tex]\( 0.05 \)[/tex], we fail to reject the null hypothesis. This means that there is not enough evidence to suggest that the success rates of men and women in challenging referee calls are different.
### Summary
- Null Hypothesis ([tex]\(H_0\)[/tex]): [tex]\( p_1 = p_2 \)[/tex]
- Alternative Hypothesis ([tex]\(H_1\)[/tex]): [tex]\( p_1 \neq p_2 \)[/tex]
- Test Statistic ([tex]\(z\)[/tex]): [tex]\(\boxed{0.10}\)[/tex]
Thus, we conclude that the success rates for men and women in challenging calls are statistically equal in this context.
Thanks for using our platform. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. We're dedicated to helping you find the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Don't hesitate to return for more.
