adhleyavery
Answered

Find the best solutions to your questions at Westonci.ca, the premier Q&A platform with a community of knowledgeable experts. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals.

Scientists often work on projects for a long time and fail to see sources of error in their research. Which process allows an outside expert to look at the scientist's project and point to sources of error?

A. Direct funding
B. Peer review
C. Conclusive research
D. Data collection

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

Peer review is a vital process in science that involves experts reviewing a scientist's work to correct errors and ensure accuracy.


Explanation:

Peer review is the process that allows an outside expert to examine a scientist's project and identify sources of error. It involves other scientists in the same field carefully scrutinizing the project before it is published, helping to improve the research and ensure its accuracy. This method is essential for building a reliable body of research and knowledge in science.


Learn more about Peer Review here:

https://brainly.com/question/28500731


We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. We're glad you visited Westonci.ca. Return anytime for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.