Historians analyze writings, images, and visual representations like woodcuts and cartoons to understand the engagement in constitutional debates.
Historians today can get an idea of how many people were engaged with constitutional debates by looking at writings such as newspapers, pamphlets, and essays that were published at that time. These writings, including the Federalist papers and Anti-Federalist essays, provide insights into the arguments and discussions surrounding the ratification of the Constitution.
Additionally, images like woodcuts, cartoons, and murals from that era also offer valuable visual representations of the debates and sentiments of that time. They often conveyed key messages and positions taken by the Federalists and Anti-Federalists during the constitutional debates.
Political cartoons, woodcuts, and written materials served as important tools for both sides to communicate their viewpoints, influence public opinion, and participate in the broader discourse surrounding the formation of the new government in the United States.
https://brainly.com/question/11256775
