At Westonci.ca, we connect you with experts who provide detailed answers to your most pressing questions. Start exploring now! Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform.

The data in the table represents a company's profit based on the number of items produced.

Profit Based on Number of Items Produced

[tex]\[
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|}
\hline
\text{Items produced } (x) & \text{Dollars of profit } (y) \\
\hline
100 & -70,500 \\
\hline
200 & 50 \\
\hline
300 & 50,100 \\
\hline
400 & 80,300 \\
\hline
500 & 90,400 \\
\hline
600 & 78,000 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\][/tex]

Which equation best represents the data?

A. [tex]\( y = -1.026 x^2 + 1016.402 x - 162075 \)[/tex]

B. [tex]\( y = -1.036 x^2 + 1024.771 x - 163710 \)[/tex]

C. [tex]\( y = 298.214 x - 66317.667 \)[/tex]

D. [tex]\( y = 196.2 x - 18710 \)[/tex]


Sagot :

To determine which of the given equations best fits the data in the table, we need to evaluate each model by calculating the sum of the squared errors (SSE) for each one. The model with the lowest SSE will be the best fit for the data. Here are the equations and the models:

1. [tex]\( y = -1.026x^2 + 1016.402x - 162075 \)[/tex]
2. [tex]\( y = -1.036x^2 + 1024.771x - 163710 \)[/tex]
3. [tex]\( y = 298.214x - 66317.667 \)[/tex]
4. [tex]\( y = 196.2x - 18710 \)[/tex]

Given data points:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \text{Items produced } (x) & \text{Dollars of profit } (y) \\ \hline 100 & -70500 \\ 200 & 50 \\ 300 & 50100 \\ 400 & 80300 \\ 500 & 90400 \\ 600 & 78000 \\ \hline \end{array} \][/tex]

Let's calculate the sum of squared errors (SSE) for each model.

### Model 1: [tex]\( y = -1.026x^2 + 1016.402x - 162075 \)[/tex]

Calculate the predicted [tex]\( y \)[/tex] values and SSE for Model 1:
[tex]\[ \text{SSE}_1 \approx 980515.6400000884 \][/tex]

### Model 2: [tex]\( y = -1.036x^2 + 1024.771x - 163710 \)[/tex]

Calculate the predicted [tex]\( y \)[/tex] values and SSE for Model 2:
[tex]\[ \text{SSE}_2 \approx 1981387.31 \][/tex]

### Model 3: [tex]\( y = 298.214x - 66317.667 \)[/tex]

Calculate the predicted [tex]\( y \)[/tex] values and SSE for Model 3:
[tex]\[ \text{SSE}_3 \approx 3930834054.897733 \][/tex]

### Model 4: [tex]\( y = 196.2x - 18710 \)[/tex]

Calculate the predicted [tex]\( y \)[/tex] values and SSE for Model 4:
[tex]\[ \text{SSE}_4 \approx 6601942100.0 \][/tex]

Now, comparing the SSE values for each model:

[tex]\[ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \text{Model} & \text{SSE} \\ \hline 1 & 980515.6400000884 \\ 2 & 1981387.31 \\ 3 & 3930834054.897733 \\ 4 & 6601942100.0 \\ \hline \end{array} \][/tex]

The model with the lowest SSE is Model 1 with an SSE of [tex]\( 980515.6400000884 \)[/tex].

### Conclusion
The equation that best represents the data is:

[tex]\[ y = -1.026x^2 + 1016.402x - 162075 \][/tex]