Westonci.ca is the premier destination for reliable answers to your questions, provided by a community of experts. Connect with professionals ready to provide precise answers to your questions on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.
Sagot :
Let's analyze the piecewise function [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] and calculate the corresponding [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-values for each given [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-value in the tables provided:
The piecewise function [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] is defined as:
[tex]\[ f(x) = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} -\frac{5}{4} x + 90, & \text{for } 0 \leq x < 40 \\ -\frac{3}{8} x + 75, & \text{for } 40 \leq x \leq 200 \end{array} \right. \][/tex]
### 1. First Table
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline $x$ & $y$ \\ \hline 0 & 90 \\ \hline 16 & 85 \\ \hline 40 & 75 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
Calculations:
- For [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(0) = -\frac{5}{4}(0) + 90 = 90 \][/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 16 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(16) = -\frac{5}{4}(16) + 90 = -20 + 90 = 70 \quad \text{(This doesn't match the given table value of 85)} \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( x = 16 \)[/tex] yields 70, not 85, this table is incorrect.
### 2. Second Table
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline $x$ & $y$ \\ \hline 0 & 90 \\ \hline 40 & 40 \\ \hline 200 & 0 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
Calculations:
- For [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(0) = -\frac{5}{4}(0) + 90 = 90 \][/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 40 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(40) = -\frac{3}{8}(40) + 75 = -15 + 75 = 60 \quad \text{(This doesn't match the given table value of 40)} \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( x = 40 \)[/tex] yields 60, not 40, this table is incorrect.
### 3. Third Table
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline $x$ & $y$ \\ \hline 40 & 75 \\ \hline 120 & 30 \\ \hline 200 & 0 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
Calculations:
- For [tex]\( x = 40 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(40) = -\frac{3}{8}(40) + 75 = -15 + 75 = 60 \quad \text{(This doesn't match the given table value of 75)} \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( x = 40 \)[/tex] yields 60, not 75, this table is also incorrect.
### 4. Fourth Table
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline $x$ & $y$ \\ \hline 40 & 60 \\ \hline 160 & 15 \\ \hline 200 & 0 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
Calculations:
- For [tex]\( x = 40 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(40) = -\frac{3}{8}(40) + 75 = -15 + 75 = 60 \][/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 160 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(160) = -\frac{3}{8}(160) + 75 = -60 + 75 = 15 \][/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 200 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(200) = -\frac{3}{8}(200) + 75 = -75 + 75 = 0 \][/tex]
Based on these calculations, the fourth table correctly reflects the piecewise function values:
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline $x$ & $y$ \\ \hline 40 & 60 \\ \hline 160 & 15 \\ \hline 200 & 0 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
Thus, the correct table to use is the fourth one.
The piecewise function [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] is defined as:
[tex]\[ f(x) = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} -\frac{5}{4} x + 90, & \text{for } 0 \leq x < 40 \\ -\frac{3}{8} x + 75, & \text{for } 40 \leq x \leq 200 \end{array} \right. \][/tex]
### 1. First Table
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline $x$ & $y$ \\ \hline 0 & 90 \\ \hline 16 & 85 \\ \hline 40 & 75 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
Calculations:
- For [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(0) = -\frac{5}{4}(0) + 90 = 90 \][/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 16 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(16) = -\frac{5}{4}(16) + 90 = -20 + 90 = 70 \quad \text{(This doesn't match the given table value of 85)} \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( x = 16 \)[/tex] yields 70, not 85, this table is incorrect.
### 2. Second Table
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline $x$ & $y$ \\ \hline 0 & 90 \\ \hline 40 & 40 \\ \hline 200 & 0 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
Calculations:
- For [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(0) = -\frac{5}{4}(0) + 90 = 90 \][/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 40 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(40) = -\frac{3}{8}(40) + 75 = -15 + 75 = 60 \quad \text{(This doesn't match the given table value of 40)} \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( x = 40 \)[/tex] yields 60, not 40, this table is incorrect.
### 3. Third Table
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline $x$ & $y$ \\ \hline 40 & 75 \\ \hline 120 & 30 \\ \hline 200 & 0 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
Calculations:
- For [tex]\( x = 40 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(40) = -\frac{3}{8}(40) + 75 = -15 + 75 = 60 \quad \text{(This doesn't match the given table value of 75)} \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( x = 40 \)[/tex] yields 60, not 75, this table is also incorrect.
### 4. Fourth Table
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline $x$ & $y$ \\ \hline 40 & 60 \\ \hline 160 & 15 \\ \hline 200 & 0 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
Calculations:
- For [tex]\( x = 40 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(40) = -\frac{3}{8}(40) + 75 = -15 + 75 = 60 \][/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 160 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(160) = -\frac{3}{8}(160) + 75 = -60 + 75 = 15 \][/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 200 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(200) = -\frac{3}{8}(200) + 75 = -75 + 75 = 0 \][/tex]
Based on these calculations, the fourth table correctly reflects the piecewise function values:
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline $x$ & $y$ \\ \hline 40 & 60 \\ \hline 160 & 15 \\ \hline 200 & 0 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
Thus, the correct table to use is the fourth one.
Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. We're dedicated to helping you find the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Don't hesitate to return for more.