Discover answers to your questions with Westonci.ca, the leading Q&A platform that connects you with knowledgeable experts. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable professionals on our platform. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately.
Sagot :
Let's analyze the piecewise function [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] and calculate the corresponding [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-values for each given [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-value in the tables provided:
The piecewise function [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] is defined as:
[tex]\[ f(x) = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} -\frac{5}{4} x + 90, & \text{for } 0 \leq x < 40 \\ -\frac{3}{8} x + 75, & \text{for } 40 \leq x \leq 200 \end{array} \right. \][/tex]
### 1. First Table
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline $x$ & $y$ \\ \hline 0 & 90 \\ \hline 16 & 85 \\ \hline 40 & 75 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
Calculations:
- For [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(0) = -\frac{5}{4}(0) + 90 = 90 \][/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 16 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(16) = -\frac{5}{4}(16) + 90 = -20 + 90 = 70 \quad \text{(This doesn't match the given table value of 85)} \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( x = 16 \)[/tex] yields 70, not 85, this table is incorrect.
### 2. Second Table
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline $x$ & $y$ \\ \hline 0 & 90 \\ \hline 40 & 40 \\ \hline 200 & 0 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
Calculations:
- For [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(0) = -\frac{5}{4}(0) + 90 = 90 \][/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 40 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(40) = -\frac{3}{8}(40) + 75 = -15 + 75 = 60 \quad \text{(This doesn't match the given table value of 40)} \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( x = 40 \)[/tex] yields 60, not 40, this table is incorrect.
### 3. Third Table
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline $x$ & $y$ \\ \hline 40 & 75 \\ \hline 120 & 30 \\ \hline 200 & 0 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
Calculations:
- For [tex]\( x = 40 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(40) = -\frac{3}{8}(40) + 75 = -15 + 75 = 60 \quad \text{(This doesn't match the given table value of 75)} \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( x = 40 \)[/tex] yields 60, not 75, this table is also incorrect.
### 4. Fourth Table
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline $x$ & $y$ \\ \hline 40 & 60 \\ \hline 160 & 15 \\ \hline 200 & 0 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
Calculations:
- For [tex]\( x = 40 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(40) = -\frac{3}{8}(40) + 75 = -15 + 75 = 60 \][/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 160 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(160) = -\frac{3}{8}(160) + 75 = -60 + 75 = 15 \][/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 200 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(200) = -\frac{3}{8}(200) + 75 = -75 + 75 = 0 \][/tex]
Based on these calculations, the fourth table correctly reflects the piecewise function values:
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline $x$ & $y$ \\ \hline 40 & 60 \\ \hline 160 & 15 \\ \hline 200 & 0 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
Thus, the correct table to use is the fourth one.
The piecewise function [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] is defined as:
[tex]\[ f(x) = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} -\frac{5}{4} x + 90, & \text{for } 0 \leq x < 40 \\ -\frac{3}{8} x + 75, & \text{for } 40 \leq x \leq 200 \end{array} \right. \][/tex]
### 1. First Table
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline $x$ & $y$ \\ \hline 0 & 90 \\ \hline 16 & 85 \\ \hline 40 & 75 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
Calculations:
- For [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(0) = -\frac{5}{4}(0) + 90 = 90 \][/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 16 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(16) = -\frac{5}{4}(16) + 90 = -20 + 90 = 70 \quad \text{(This doesn't match the given table value of 85)} \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( x = 16 \)[/tex] yields 70, not 85, this table is incorrect.
### 2. Second Table
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline $x$ & $y$ \\ \hline 0 & 90 \\ \hline 40 & 40 \\ \hline 200 & 0 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
Calculations:
- For [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(0) = -\frac{5}{4}(0) + 90 = 90 \][/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 40 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(40) = -\frac{3}{8}(40) + 75 = -15 + 75 = 60 \quad \text{(This doesn't match the given table value of 40)} \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( x = 40 \)[/tex] yields 60, not 40, this table is incorrect.
### 3. Third Table
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline $x$ & $y$ \\ \hline 40 & 75 \\ \hline 120 & 30 \\ \hline 200 & 0 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
Calculations:
- For [tex]\( x = 40 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(40) = -\frac{3}{8}(40) + 75 = -15 + 75 = 60 \quad \text{(This doesn't match the given table value of 75)} \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( x = 40 \)[/tex] yields 60, not 75, this table is also incorrect.
### 4. Fourth Table
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline $x$ & $y$ \\ \hline 40 & 60 \\ \hline 160 & 15 \\ \hline 200 & 0 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
Calculations:
- For [tex]\( x = 40 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(40) = -\frac{3}{8}(40) + 75 = -15 + 75 = 60 \][/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 160 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(160) = -\frac{3}{8}(160) + 75 = -60 + 75 = 15 \][/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 200 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(200) = -\frac{3}{8}(200) + 75 = -75 + 75 = 0 \][/tex]
Based on these calculations, the fourth table correctly reflects the piecewise function values:
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline $x$ & $y$ \\ \hline 40 & 60 \\ \hline 160 & 15 \\ \hline 200 & 0 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
Thus, the correct table to use is the fourth one.
Thanks for using our service. We aim to provide the most accurate answers for all your queries. Visit us again for more insights. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Your questions are important to us at Westonci.ca. Visit again for expert answers and reliable information.
