Welcome to Westonci.ca, your one-stop destination for finding answers to all your questions. Join our expert community now! Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our Q&A platform. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals.
Sagot :
To determine whether each set of quantum numbers describes a valid orbital, we must check the following conditions for the principal quantum number [tex]\(n\)[/tex], angular momentum quantum number [tex]\(l\)[/tex], and magnetic quantum number [tex]\(m\)[/tex]:
1. [tex]\(n > 0\)[/tex]
2. [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex]
3. [tex]\(-l \leq m \leq l\)[/tex]
Let's evaluate each set of quantum numbers one by one:
1. Set [tex]\( (n=1, l=0, m=0) \)[/tex]:
- [tex]\( n = 1 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(n > 0\)[/tex], so this is valid.
- [tex]\( l = 0 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex], so this is valid.
- [tex]\( m = 0 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(-l \leq m \leq l\)[/tex], so this is valid.
- Conclusion: This is a valid set of quantum numbers.
2. Set [tex]\( (n=2, l=1, m=3) \)[/tex]:
- [tex]\( n = 2 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(n > 0\)[/tex], so this is valid.
- [tex]\( l = 1 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex], so this is valid.
- [tex]\( m = 3 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(-l \leq m \leq l\)[/tex], [tex]\(-1 \leq 3 \leq 1\)[/tex] is not satisfied.
- Conclusion: This is not a valid set of quantum numbers.
3. Set [tex]\( (n=2, l=2, m=2) \)[/tex]:
- [tex]\( n = 2 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(n > 0\)[/tex], so this is valid.
- [tex]\( l = 2 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex], [tex]\(0 \leq 2 < 2\)[/tex] is not satisfied.
- [tex]\( m = 2 \)[/tex]: This does not need to be checked further since [tex]\(l\)[/tex] is not valid.
- Conclusion: This is not a valid set of quantum numbers.
4. Set [tex]\( (n=3, l=0, m=0) \)[/tex]:
- [tex]\( n = 3 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(n > 0\)[/tex], so this is valid.
- [tex]\( l = 0 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex], so this is valid.
- [tex]\( m = 0 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(-l \leq m \leq l\)[/tex], so this is valid.
- Conclusion: This is a valid set of quantum numbers.
5. Set [tex]\( (n=5, l=4, m=-3) \)[/tex]:
- [tex]\( n = 5 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(n > 0\)[/tex], so this is valid.
- [tex]\( l = 4 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex], so this is valid.
- [tex]\( m = -3 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(-l \leq m \leq l\)[/tex], [tex]\(-4 \leq -3 \leq 4\)[/tex] is satisfied.
- Conclusion: This is a valid set of quantum numbers.
6. Set [tex]\( (n=4, l=-2, m=2) \)[/tex]:
- [tex]\( n = 4 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(n > 0\)[/tex], so this is valid.
- [tex]\( l = -2 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex], [tex]\(0 \leq -2 < 4\)[/tex] is not satisfied.
- [tex]\( m = 2 \)[/tex]: This does not need to be checked further since [tex]\(l\)[/tex] is not valid.
- Conclusion: This is not a valid set of quantum numbers.
Final Conclusion: The sets of quantum numbers that describe valid orbitals are:
- [tex]\( (n=1, l=0, m=0) \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( (n=3, l=0, m=0) \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( (n=5, l=4, m=-3) \)[/tex]
1. [tex]\(n > 0\)[/tex]
2. [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex]
3. [tex]\(-l \leq m \leq l\)[/tex]
Let's evaluate each set of quantum numbers one by one:
1. Set [tex]\( (n=1, l=0, m=0) \)[/tex]:
- [tex]\( n = 1 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(n > 0\)[/tex], so this is valid.
- [tex]\( l = 0 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex], so this is valid.
- [tex]\( m = 0 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(-l \leq m \leq l\)[/tex], so this is valid.
- Conclusion: This is a valid set of quantum numbers.
2. Set [tex]\( (n=2, l=1, m=3) \)[/tex]:
- [tex]\( n = 2 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(n > 0\)[/tex], so this is valid.
- [tex]\( l = 1 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex], so this is valid.
- [tex]\( m = 3 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(-l \leq m \leq l\)[/tex], [tex]\(-1 \leq 3 \leq 1\)[/tex] is not satisfied.
- Conclusion: This is not a valid set of quantum numbers.
3. Set [tex]\( (n=2, l=2, m=2) \)[/tex]:
- [tex]\( n = 2 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(n > 0\)[/tex], so this is valid.
- [tex]\( l = 2 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex], [tex]\(0 \leq 2 < 2\)[/tex] is not satisfied.
- [tex]\( m = 2 \)[/tex]: This does not need to be checked further since [tex]\(l\)[/tex] is not valid.
- Conclusion: This is not a valid set of quantum numbers.
4. Set [tex]\( (n=3, l=0, m=0) \)[/tex]:
- [tex]\( n = 3 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(n > 0\)[/tex], so this is valid.
- [tex]\( l = 0 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex], so this is valid.
- [tex]\( m = 0 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(-l \leq m \leq l\)[/tex], so this is valid.
- Conclusion: This is a valid set of quantum numbers.
5. Set [tex]\( (n=5, l=4, m=-3) \)[/tex]:
- [tex]\( n = 5 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(n > 0\)[/tex], so this is valid.
- [tex]\( l = 4 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex], so this is valid.
- [tex]\( m = -3 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(-l \leq m \leq l\)[/tex], [tex]\(-4 \leq -3 \leq 4\)[/tex] is satisfied.
- Conclusion: This is a valid set of quantum numbers.
6. Set [tex]\( (n=4, l=-2, m=2) \)[/tex]:
- [tex]\( n = 4 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(n > 0\)[/tex], so this is valid.
- [tex]\( l = -2 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex], [tex]\(0 \leq -2 < 4\)[/tex] is not satisfied.
- [tex]\( m = 2 \)[/tex]: This does not need to be checked further since [tex]\(l\)[/tex] is not valid.
- Conclusion: This is not a valid set of quantum numbers.
Final Conclusion: The sets of quantum numbers that describe valid orbitals are:
- [tex]\( (n=1, l=0, m=0) \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( (n=3, l=0, m=0) \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( (n=5, l=4, m=-3) \)[/tex]
Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Westonci.ca is your go-to source for reliable answers. Return soon for more expert insights.
