Welcome to Westonci.ca, the place where your questions find answers from a community of knowledgeable experts. Discover comprehensive answers to your questions from knowledgeable professionals on our user-friendly platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.
Sagot :
Let's carefully examine the prime factorization of the number 60 provided by Darius, which is expressed as [tex]\(2 \times 3 \times 5\)[/tex].
### Step-by-Step Solution:
1. Identify the Prime Factors of 60:
To correctly factorize 60 into its prime components, we perform the following steps:
- Divide 60 by the smallest prime number, which is 2:
[tex]\[ 60 \div 2 = 30 \][/tex]
- Next, divide 30 by 2 again:
[tex]\[ 30 \div 2 = 15 \][/tex]
- Finally, divide 15 by the next smallest prime, which is 3:
[tex]\[ 15 \div 3 = 5 \][/tex]
- At this point, 5 remains, which is a prime number itself.
2. List all Prime Factors:
Collecting all the prime factors from each division step, we have:
[tex]\[ 60 = 2 \times 2 \times 3 \times 5 \][/tex]
3. Compare with Darius's Factorization:
Darius's factorization is:
[tex]\[ 60 = 2 \times 3 \times 5 \][/tex]
4. Analyze the Possible Errors:
- Option 1: Darius should have started the factor tree with [tex]\(2 \times 30\)[/tex].
This is not a crucial error as starting the factor tree at different points can still lead to the correct prime factorization.
- Option 2: Darius did not complete the factorization; 5 is a composite number.
This statement is factually incorrect because 5 is a prime number, not a composite number. Therefore, this is an incorrect error.
- Option 3: Darius should have expressed 15 as [tex]\(5 \times 5\)[/tex], not [tex]\(3 \times 5\)[/tex].
This is incorrect because 15 is indeed [tex]\(3 \times 5\)[/tex]; expressing it as [tex]\(5 \times 5\)[/tex] would be an error.
- Option 4: Darius should have expressed 60 as [tex]\(2^2 \times 3 \times 5\)[/tex], not [tex]\(2 \times 3 \times 5\)[/tex].
Indeed, Darius has missed one prime factor of 2. The correct factorization includes two 2s:
[tex]\[ 60 = 2^2 \times 3 \times 5 \][/tex]
Therefore, Darius's error is:
Corrected Statement:
- Darius should have expressed 60 as [tex]\(2^2 \times 3 \times 5\)[/tex], not [tex]\(2 \times 3 \times 5\)[/tex].
Darius missed one of the prime factors 2, leading to an incomplete factorization. The correct prime factorization fully describes 60 as [tex]\(2^2 \times 3 \times 5\)[/tex].
### Step-by-Step Solution:
1. Identify the Prime Factors of 60:
To correctly factorize 60 into its prime components, we perform the following steps:
- Divide 60 by the smallest prime number, which is 2:
[tex]\[ 60 \div 2 = 30 \][/tex]
- Next, divide 30 by 2 again:
[tex]\[ 30 \div 2 = 15 \][/tex]
- Finally, divide 15 by the next smallest prime, which is 3:
[tex]\[ 15 \div 3 = 5 \][/tex]
- At this point, 5 remains, which is a prime number itself.
2. List all Prime Factors:
Collecting all the prime factors from each division step, we have:
[tex]\[ 60 = 2 \times 2 \times 3 \times 5 \][/tex]
3. Compare with Darius's Factorization:
Darius's factorization is:
[tex]\[ 60 = 2 \times 3 \times 5 \][/tex]
4. Analyze the Possible Errors:
- Option 1: Darius should have started the factor tree with [tex]\(2 \times 30\)[/tex].
This is not a crucial error as starting the factor tree at different points can still lead to the correct prime factorization.
- Option 2: Darius did not complete the factorization; 5 is a composite number.
This statement is factually incorrect because 5 is a prime number, not a composite number. Therefore, this is an incorrect error.
- Option 3: Darius should have expressed 15 as [tex]\(5 \times 5\)[/tex], not [tex]\(3 \times 5\)[/tex].
This is incorrect because 15 is indeed [tex]\(3 \times 5\)[/tex]; expressing it as [tex]\(5 \times 5\)[/tex] would be an error.
- Option 4: Darius should have expressed 60 as [tex]\(2^2 \times 3 \times 5\)[/tex], not [tex]\(2 \times 3 \times 5\)[/tex].
Indeed, Darius has missed one prime factor of 2. The correct factorization includes two 2s:
[tex]\[ 60 = 2^2 \times 3 \times 5 \][/tex]
Therefore, Darius's error is:
Corrected Statement:
- Darius should have expressed 60 as [tex]\(2^2 \times 3 \times 5\)[/tex], not [tex]\(2 \times 3 \times 5\)[/tex].
Darius missed one of the prime factors 2, leading to an incomplete factorization. The correct prime factorization fully describes 60 as [tex]\(2^2 \times 3 \times 5\)[/tex].
Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed by returning for our latest expert advice.