Find the best solutions to your questions at Westonci.ca, the premier Q&A platform with a community of knowledgeable experts. Ask your questions and receive accurate answers from professionals with extensive experience in various fields on our platform. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.
Sagot :
Let's carefully examine the prime factorization of the number 60 provided by Darius, which is expressed as [tex]\(2 \times 3 \times 5\)[/tex].
### Step-by-Step Solution:
1. Identify the Prime Factors of 60:
To correctly factorize 60 into its prime components, we perform the following steps:
- Divide 60 by the smallest prime number, which is 2:
[tex]\[ 60 \div 2 = 30 \][/tex]
- Next, divide 30 by 2 again:
[tex]\[ 30 \div 2 = 15 \][/tex]
- Finally, divide 15 by the next smallest prime, which is 3:
[tex]\[ 15 \div 3 = 5 \][/tex]
- At this point, 5 remains, which is a prime number itself.
2. List all Prime Factors:
Collecting all the prime factors from each division step, we have:
[tex]\[ 60 = 2 \times 2 \times 3 \times 5 \][/tex]
3. Compare with Darius's Factorization:
Darius's factorization is:
[tex]\[ 60 = 2 \times 3 \times 5 \][/tex]
4. Analyze the Possible Errors:
- Option 1: Darius should have started the factor tree with [tex]\(2 \times 30\)[/tex].
This is not a crucial error as starting the factor tree at different points can still lead to the correct prime factorization.
- Option 2: Darius did not complete the factorization; 5 is a composite number.
This statement is factually incorrect because 5 is a prime number, not a composite number. Therefore, this is an incorrect error.
- Option 3: Darius should have expressed 15 as [tex]\(5 \times 5\)[/tex], not [tex]\(3 \times 5\)[/tex].
This is incorrect because 15 is indeed [tex]\(3 \times 5\)[/tex]; expressing it as [tex]\(5 \times 5\)[/tex] would be an error.
- Option 4: Darius should have expressed 60 as [tex]\(2^2 \times 3 \times 5\)[/tex], not [tex]\(2 \times 3 \times 5\)[/tex].
Indeed, Darius has missed one prime factor of 2. The correct factorization includes two 2s:
[tex]\[ 60 = 2^2 \times 3 \times 5 \][/tex]
Therefore, Darius's error is:
Corrected Statement:
- Darius should have expressed 60 as [tex]\(2^2 \times 3 \times 5\)[/tex], not [tex]\(2 \times 3 \times 5\)[/tex].
Darius missed one of the prime factors 2, leading to an incomplete factorization. The correct prime factorization fully describes 60 as [tex]\(2^2 \times 3 \times 5\)[/tex].
### Step-by-Step Solution:
1. Identify the Prime Factors of 60:
To correctly factorize 60 into its prime components, we perform the following steps:
- Divide 60 by the smallest prime number, which is 2:
[tex]\[ 60 \div 2 = 30 \][/tex]
- Next, divide 30 by 2 again:
[tex]\[ 30 \div 2 = 15 \][/tex]
- Finally, divide 15 by the next smallest prime, which is 3:
[tex]\[ 15 \div 3 = 5 \][/tex]
- At this point, 5 remains, which is a prime number itself.
2. List all Prime Factors:
Collecting all the prime factors from each division step, we have:
[tex]\[ 60 = 2 \times 2 \times 3 \times 5 \][/tex]
3. Compare with Darius's Factorization:
Darius's factorization is:
[tex]\[ 60 = 2 \times 3 \times 5 \][/tex]
4. Analyze the Possible Errors:
- Option 1: Darius should have started the factor tree with [tex]\(2 \times 30\)[/tex].
This is not a crucial error as starting the factor tree at different points can still lead to the correct prime factorization.
- Option 2: Darius did not complete the factorization; 5 is a composite number.
This statement is factually incorrect because 5 is a prime number, not a composite number. Therefore, this is an incorrect error.
- Option 3: Darius should have expressed 15 as [tex]\(5 \times 5\)[/tex], not [tex]\(3 \times 5\)[/tex].
This is incorrect because 15 is indeed [tex]\(3 \times 5\)[/tex]; expressing it as [tex]\(5 \times 5\)[/tex] would be an error.
- Option 4: Darius should have expressed 60 as [tex]\(2^2 \times 3 \times 5\)[/tex], not [tex]\(2 \times 3 \times 5\)[/tex].
Indeed, Darius has missed one prime factor of 2. The correct factorization includes two 2s:
[tex]\[ 60 = 2^2 \times 3 \times 5 \][/tex]
Therefore, Darius's error is:
Corrected Statement:
- Darius should have expressed 60 as [tex]\(2^2 \times 3 \times 5\)[/tex], not [tex]\(2 \times 3 \times 5\)[/tex].
Darius missed one of the prime factors 2, leading to an incomplete factorization. The correct prime factorization fully describes 60 as [tex]\(2^2 \times 3 \times 5\)[/tex].
We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. Thank you for trusting Westonci.ca. Don't forget to revisit us for more accurate and insightful answers.