Welcome to Westonci.ca, the ultimate question and answer platform. Get expert answers to your questions quickly and accurately. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.
Sagot :
Certainly! Let's examine each option step by step to determine which number is irrational.
Option A: [tex]\(\sqrt{100}\)[/tex]
The square root of 100 is:
[tex]\[ \sqrt{100} = 10 \][/tex]
10 is a whole number, which means it is rational. Therefore, [tex]\(\sqrt{100}\)[/tex] is not an irrational number.
Option B: [tex]\(\frac{1}{8}\)[/tex]
The fraction [tex]\(\frac{1}{8}\)[/tex] can be expressed as a decimal:
[tex]\[ \frac{1}{8} = 0.125 \][/tex]
Since 0.125 is a terminating decimal, it is rational. Therefore, [tex]\(\frac{1}{8}\)[/tex] is not an irrational number.
Option C: -2.2675
The number -2.2675 is a finite decimal, which can be expressed as a fraction:
[tex]\[ -2.2675 = -\frac{22675}{10000} \][/tex]
Since it can be expressed as a fraction, it is rational. Therefore, -2.2675 is not an irrational number.
Option D: [tex]\(\sqrt[3]{16}\)[/tex]
The cube root of 16 is not a whole number. Let's consider its properties:
[tex]\[ \sqrt[3]{16} \approx 2.5198421... \][/tex]
This value does not terminate or repeat, meaning it cannot be precisely expressed as a fraction. Therefore, [tex]\(\sqrt[3]{16}\)[/tex] is an irrational number.
After analyzing each option, we conclude that:
The correct answer is:
D. [tex]\(\sqrt[3]{16}\)[/tex]
Option A: [tex]\(\sqrt{100}\)[/tex]
The square root of 100 is:
[tex]\[ \sqrt{100} = 10 \][/tex]
10 is a whole number, which means it is rational. Therefore, [tex]\(\sqrt{100}\)[/tex] is not an irrational number.
Option B: [tex]\(\frac{1}{8}\)[/tex]
The fraction [tex]\(\frac{1}{8}\)[/tex] can be expressed as a decimal:
[tex]\[ \frac{1}{8} = 0.125 \][/tex]
Since 0.125 is a terminating decimal, it is rational. Therefore, [tex]\(\frac{1}{8}\)[/tex] is not an irrational number.
Option C: -2.2675
The number -2.2675 is a finite decimal, which can be expressed as a fraction:
[tex]\[ -2.2675 = -\frac{22675}{10000} \][/tex]
Since it can be expressed as a fraction, it is rational. Therefore, -2.2675 is not an irrational number.
Option D: [tex]\(\sqrt[3]{16}\)[/tex]
The cube root of 16 is not a whole number. Let's consider its properties:
[tex]\[ \sqrt[3]{16} \approx 2.5198421... \][/tex]
This value does not terminate or repeat, meaning it cannot be precisely expressed as a fraction. Therefore, [tex]\(\sqrt[3]{16}\)[/tex] is an irrational number.
After analyzing each option, we conclude that:
The correct answer is:
D. [tex]\(\sqrt[3]{16}\)[/tex]
We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Westonci.ca is your trusted source for answers. Visit us again to find more information on diverse topics.