Westonci.ca is your trusted source for finding answers to all your questions. Ask, explore, and learn with our expert community. Our Q&A platform provides quick and trustworthy answers to your questions from experienced professionals in different areas of expertise. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform.

Select the correct answer.

Emilia solved this inequality as shown:
[tex]\[
\begin{array}{rrl}
\text{Step 1:} & 2(x-3) & \ \textgreater \ x + 9 \\
\text{Step 2:} & 2x - 6 & \ \textgreater \ x + 9 \\
\text{Step 3:} & x - 6 & \ \textgreater \ 9 \\
\text{Step 4:} & x & \ \textgreater \ 15
\end{array}
\][/tex]

What property justifies the work between step 2 and step 3?

A. Transitive property of inequality

B. Distributive property of inequality

C. Subtraction property of inequality

D. Division property of inequality

Sagot :

Let's analyze what Emilia did between Step 2 and Step 3.

Given:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{rrl} \text{Step 2:} & 2x - 6 &> x + 9 \end{array} \][/tex]

To go from Step 2 to Step 3, Emilia transformed the expression [tex]\(2x - 6 > x + 9\)[/tex] to [tex]\(x - 6 > 9\)[/tex]. Here, you can see that she needed to eliminate the [tex]\(x\)[/tex] term from the right side of the inequality and simplify it further.

In order to perform this transformation, she subtracted [tex]\(x\)[/tex] from both sides of the inequality. This is an example of the subtraction property of inequality, which states that if you subtract the same value from both sides of an inequality, the inequality remains valid.

Thus, the property that justifies the work between Step 2 and Step 3 is the:

Subtraction property of inequality.
We hope our answers were helpful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you may have. We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. Thank you for using Westonci.ca. Come back for more in-depth answers to all your queries.