Find the information you're looking for at Westonci.ca, the trusted Q&A platform with a community of knowledgeable experts. Explore thousands of questions and answers from a knowledgeable community of experts ready to help you find solutions. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.
Sagot :
The given problem involves identifying the discrepancies in the survey results table based on the details provided:
1. Breakfast:
- Given that breakfast is preferred by one and a half times more children than adults, if the number of children preferring breakfast is 31, then the number of adults preferring breakfast would be [tex]\( \frac{31}{1.5} = \frac{31}{1.5} = 20.67 \)[/tex] (approximately 21 adults).
2. Lunch:
- There were 62 adults who responded to lunch, twice as many as the number of children. Therefore, the number of children preferring lunch would be [tex]\( \frac{62}{2} = 31 \)[/tex] children.
3. Dinner:
- Children and adults both had 24 respondents for dinner which checks out with the given data.
The results table indicates:
- Breakfast: 31 children, 45 adults (Total: 75)
- Lunch: 30 children, 62 adults (Total: 93)
- Dinner: 24 children, 48 adults (Total: 72)
- Total: 131 children, 216 adults (Total: 347)
When we verify with the results:
- Breakfast: Given 31 children and calculated 21 adults, the total should be [tex]\( 31 + 21 = 52 \)[/tex], not 75.
- Lunch: The calculated number of children is 31, but the table says 30. Therefore, this is identified as incorrect.
- Dinner: Both match the data, 24 each (total 48), checking out.
- Totals: When summing the corrected individual data:
- Correct total children: [tex]\( 31 (Breakfast) + 31 (Lunch) + 24 (Dinner) = 86 \)[/tex], but the table displays 131 which appears incorrect.
- Correct total adults: [tex]\( 21 (Breakfast) + 62 (Lunch) + 24 (Dinner) = 107 \)[/tex], but the table displays 216 which appears incorrect.
Result:
The table has errors in the "Breakfast in children" and "Lunch for children". Furthermore, the totals for Children and Adults' categories are also incorrect.
1. Breakfast:
- Given that breakfast is preferred by one and a half times more children than adults, if the number of children preferring breakfast is 31, then the number of adults preferring breakfast would be [tex]\( \frac{31}{1.5} = \frac{31}{1.5} = 20.67 \)[/tex] (approximately 21 adults).
2. Lunch:
- There were 62 adults who responded to lunch, twice as many as the number of children. Therefore, the number of children preferring lunch would be [tex]\( \frac{62}{2} = 31 \)[/tex] children.
3. Dinner:
- Children and adults both had 24 respondents for dinner which checks out with the given data.
The results table indicates:
- Breakfast: 31 children, 45 adults (Total: 75)
- Lunch: 30 children, 62 adults (Total: 93)
- Dinner: 24 children, 48 adults (Total: 72)
- Total: 131 children, 216 adults (Total: 347)
When we verify with the results:
- Breakfast: Given 31 children and calculated 21 adults, the total should be [tex]\( 31 + 21 = 52 \)[/tex], not 75.
- Lunch: The calculated number of children is 31, but the table says 30. Therefore, this is identified as incorrect.
- Dinner: Both match the data, 24 each (total 48), checking out.
- Totals: When summing the corrected individual data:
- Correct total children: [tex]\( 31 (Breakfast) + 31 (Lunch) + 24 (Dinner) = 86 \)[/tex], but the table displays 131 which appears incorrect.
- Correct total adults: [tex]\( 21 (Breakfast) + 62 (Lunch) + 24 (Dinner) = 107 \)[/tex], but the table displays 216 which appears incorrect.
Result:
The table has errors in the "Breakfast in children" and "Lunch for children". Furthermore, the totals for Children and Adults' categories are also incorrect.
Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. Stay curious and keep coming back to Westonci.ca for answers to all your burning questions.