Welcome to Westonci.ca, the place where your questions find answers from a community of knowledgeable experts. Get immediate answers to your questions from a wide network of experienced professionals on our Q&A platform. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.
Sagot :
To determine which statements are tautologies, we need to analyze each given statement and check if it is always true, regardless of the truth values of [tex]\( p \)[/tex] and [tex]\( q \)[/tex].
1. Statement 1: [tex]\((p \vee q) \vee (p \rightarrow q)\)[/tex]
- Let's break this statement down:
- [tex]\( p \vee q \)[/tex]: This is true if at least one of [tex]\( p \)[/tex] or [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is true.
- [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex]: This is an implication, which is true in every case except when [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is true and [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is false.
- The disjunction ([tex]\(\vee\)[/tex]) operator means the entire expression [tex]\((p \vee q) \vee (p \rightarrow q)\)[/tex] is true if at least one of the parts is true.
- Upon examining all possible truth values of [tex]\( p \)[/tex] and [tex]\( q \)[/tex], this statement is always true.
2. Statement 2: [tex]\((p \wedge q) \rightarrow (p \vee q)\)[/tex]
- Let's break this statement down:
- [tex]\( p \wedge q \)[/tex]: This is true only if both [tex]\( p \)[/tex] and [tex]\( q \)[/tex] are true.
- [tex]\( p \vee q \)[/tex]: This is true if at least one of [tex]\( p \)[/tex] or [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is true.
- The implication ([tex]\(\rightarrow\)[/tex]) operator means the entire expression [tex]\((p \wedge q) \rightarrow (p \vee q)\)[/tex] is true if [tex]\( p \wedge q \)[/tex] being true also implies that [tex]\( p \vee q \)[/tex] is true.
- If [tex]\( p \wedge q \)[/tex] is true, [tex]\( p \vee q \)[/tex] is necessarily true because both [tex]\( p \)[/tex] and [tex]\( q \)[/tex] are true. If [tex]\( p \wedge q \)[/tex] is false, the implication is true regardless of the truth value of [tex]\( p \vee q \)[/tex].
- Hence, this statement is always true.
3. Statement 3: [tex]\(q \rightarrow (p \wedge q)\)[/tex]
- Let's break this statement down:
- [tex]\( q \rightarrow (p \wedge q)\)[/tex]: This is an implication, which is true if [tex]\( q \)[/tex] implies [tex]\( p \)[/tex] and [tex]\( q \)[/tex].
- If [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is true, then for the implication to be true, [tex]\( p \wedge q \)[/tex] must also be true, meaning [tex]\( p \)[/tex] must be true.
- If [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is false, the implication [tex]\( q \rightarrow (p \wedge q) \)[/tex] is always true regardless of [tex]\( p \)[/tex].
- Testing the case where [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is true and [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is false, we find that [tex]\( q \rightarrow (p \rightarrow q) \)[/tex] is false.
- Hence, this statement is not always true.
4. Statement 4: [tex]\((p \vee q) \rightarrow p\)[/tex]
- Let's break this statement down:
- [tex]\( p \vee q \)[/tex]: This is true if at least one of [tex]\( p \)[/tex] or [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is true.
- The implication ([tex]\(\rightarrow\)[/tex]) operator means the entire expression [tex]\((p \vee q) \rightarrow p\)[/tex] is true if [tex]\( p \vee q \)[/tex] being true also implies that [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is true.
- There are cases where [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is true and [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is false, making [tex]\( p \vee q \)[/tex] true but the overall implication false because [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is false.
- Hence, this statement is not always true.
From the analysis above, the two statements that are always true (tautologies) are:
1. [tex]\((p \vee q) \vee (p \rightarrow q)\)[/tex]
2. [tex]\((p \wedge q) \rightarrow (p \vee q)\)[/tex]
These are the correct answers.
1. Statement 1: [tex]\((p \vee q) \vee (p \rightarrow q)\)[/tex]
- Let's break this statement down:
- [tex]\( p \vee q \)[/tex]: This is true if at least one of [tex]\( p \)[/tex] or [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is true.
- [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex]: This is an implication, which is true in every case except when [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is true and [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is false.
- The disjunction ([tex]\(\vee\)[/tex]) operator means the entire expression [tex]\((p \vee q) \vee (p \rightarrow q)\)[/tex] is true if at least one of the parts is true.
- Upon examining all possible truth values of [tex]\( p \)[/tex] and [tex]\( q \)[/tex], this statement is always true.
2. Statement 2: [tex]\((p \wedge q) \rightarrow (p \vee q)\)[/tex]
- Let's break this statement down:
- [tex]\( p \wedge q \)[/tex]: This is true only if both [tex]\( p \)[/tex] and [tex]\( q \)[/tex] are true.
- [tex]\( p \vee q \)[/tex]: This is true if at least one of [tex]\( p \)[/tex] or [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is true.
- The implication ([tex]\(\rightarrow\)[/tex]) operator means the entire expression [tex]\((p \wedge q) \rightarrow (p \vee q)\)[/tex] is true if [tex]\( p \wedge q \)[/tex] being true also implies that [tex]\( p \vee q \)[/tex] is true.
- If [tex]\( p \wedge q \)[/tex] is true, [tex]\( p \vee q \)[/tex] is necessarily true because both [tex]\( p \)[/tex] and [tex]\( q \)[/tex] are true. If [tex]\( p \wedge q \)[/tex] is false, the implication is true regardless of the truth value of [tex]\( p \vee q \)[/tex].
- Hence, this statement is always true.
3. Statement 3: [tex]\(q \rightarrow (p \wedge q)\)[/tex]
- Let's break this statement down:
- [tex]\( q \rightarrow (p \wedge q)\)[/tex]: This is an implication, which is true if [tex]\( q \)[/tex] implies [tex]\( p \)[/tex] and [tex]\( q \)[/tex].
- If [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is true, then for the implication to be true, [tex]\( p \wedge q \)[/tex] must also be true, meaning [tex]\( p \)[/tex] must be true.
- If [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is false, the implication [tex]\( q \rightarrow (p \wedge q) \)[/tex] is always true regardless of [tex]\( p \)[/tex].
- Testing the case where [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is true and [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is false, we find that [tex]\( q \rightarrow (p \rightarrow q) \)[/tex] is false.
- Hence, this statement is not always true.
4. Statement 4: [tex]\((p \vee q) \rightarrow p\)[/tex]
- Let's break this statement down:
- [tex]\( p \vee q \)[/tex]: This is true if at least one of [tex]\( p \)[/tex] or [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is true.
- The implication ([tex]\(\rightarrow\)[/tex]) operator means the entire expression [tex]\((p \vee q) \rightarrow p\)[/tex] is true if [tex]\( p \vee q \)[/tex] being true also implies that [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is true.
- There are cases where [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is true and [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is false, making [tex]\( p \vee q \)[/tex] true but the overall implication false because [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is false.
- Hence, this statement is not always true.
From the analysis above, the two statements that are always true (tautologies) are:
1. [tex]\((p \vee q) \vee (p \rightarrow q)\)[/tex]
2. [tex]\((p \wedge q) \rightarrow (p \vee q)\)[/tex]
These are the correct answers.
We appreciate your visit. Hopefully, the answers you found were beneficial. Don't hesitate to come back for more information. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. We're dedicated to helping you find the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Don't hesitate to return for more.
