Find the best solutions to your questions at Westonci.ca, the premier Q&A platform with a community of knowledgeable experts. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our Q&A platform. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform.
Sagot :
To determine which statement is correct when [tex]\(x + 1\)[/tex] is a factor of the polynomial [tex]\(f(x) = a_0 x^n + a_1 x^{n-1} + \ldots + a_n\)[/tex], we start by noting a fundamental property of polynomials:
If [tex]\(x + 1\)[/tex] is a factor of [tex]\(f(x)\)[/tex], then the polynomial [tex]\(f(x)\)[/tex] evaluated at [tex]\(x = -1\)[/tex] must be zero. This is derived from the factor theorem which states that if [tex]\((x - c)\)[/tex] is a factor of a polynomial [tex]\(f(x)\)[/tex], then [tex]\(f(c) = 0\)[/tex].
Given:
[tex]\[ f(x) = a_0 x^n + a_1 x^{n-1} + a_2 x^{n-2} + \ldots + a_{n-1} x + a_n \][/tex]
We evaluate [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] at [tex]\( x = -1 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(-1) = a_0 (-1)^n + a_1 (-1)^{n-1} + a_2 (-1)^{n-2} + \ldots + a_{n-1} (-1) + a_n \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( x + 1 \)[/tex] is a factor, [tex]\( f(-1) \)[/tex] must equal zero:
[tex]\[ a_0 (-1)^n + a_1 (-1)^{n-1} + a_2 (-1)^{n-2} + \ldots + a_{n-1} (-1) + a_n = 0 \][/tex]
This implies a sum of the coefficients, considering the alternating signs of the terms. Notice that the signs alternate based on the power of [tex]\(-1\)[/tex]:
For even [tex]\( n \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_0 - a_1 + a_2 - a_3 + \ldots + a_{n-1} - a_n = 0 \][/tex]
For odd [tex]\( n \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_0 - a_1 + a_2 - a_3 + \ldots - a_{n-1} + a_n = 0 \][/tex]
This equation consolidates the contributions of all coefficients and dictates the relationship we need to examine.
Now let's evaluate each given statement:
1. [tex]\( a_1 + a_3 + a_5 + \ldots = a_0 + a_2 + a_4 + \ldots \)[/tex]
- This does not directly follow from our alternating sum equation.
2. [tex]\( a_0 + a_1 + a_2 + a_3 + \ldots = 0 \)[/tex]
- This is indeed true based on our equation, as it implies the sum of all coefficients (with the same signs) results in zero.
3. [tex]\( a^2 + b + 1 = 0 \)[/tex]
- This has no relevant connection to the polynomial relationship described.
4. [tex]\( a_1 - a_2 - a_3 - \ldots = 0 \)[/tex]
- This would need to include alternating signs correctly to match our earlier equation but doesn't.
Therefore, the correct statement is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{2} \][/tex]
If [tex]\(x + 1\)[/tex] is a factor of [tex]\(f(x)\)[/tex], then the polynomial [tex]\(f(x)\)[/tex] evaluated at [tex]\(x = -1\)[/tex] must be zero. This is derived from the factor theorem which states that if [tex]\((x - c)\)[/tex] is a factor of a polynomial [tex]\(f(x)\)[/tex], then [tex]\(f(c) = 0\)[/tex].
Given:
[tex]\[ f(x) = a_0 x^n + a_1 x^{n-1} + a_2 x^{n-2} + \ldots + a_{n-1} x + a_n \][/tex]
We evaluate [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] at [tex]\( x = -1 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(-1) = a_0 (-1)^n + a_1 (-1)^{n-1} + a_2 (-1)^{n-2} + \ldots + a_{n-1} (-1) + a_n \][/tex]
Since [tex]\( x + 1 \)[/tex] is a factor, [tex]\( f(-1) \)[/tex] must equal zero:
[tex]\[ a_0 (-1)^n + a_1 (-1)^{n-1} + a_2 (-1)^{n-2} + \ldots + a_{n-1} (-1) + a_n = 0 \][/tex]
This implies a sum of the coefficients, considering the alternating signs of the terms. Notice that the signs alternate based on the power of [tex]\(-1\)[/tex]:
For even [tex]\( n \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_0 - a_1 + a_2 - a_3 + \ldots + a_{n-1} - a_n = 0 \][/tex]
For odd [tex]\( n \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ a_0 - a_1 + a_2 - a_3 + \ldots - a_{n-1} + a_n = 0 \][/tex]
This equation consolidates the contributions of all coefficients and dictates the relationship we need to examine.
Now let's evaluate each given statement:
1. [tex]\( a_1 + a_3 + a_5 + \ldots = a_0 + a_2 + a_4 + \ldots \)[/tex]
- This does not directly follow from our alternating sum equation.
2. [tex]\( a_0 + a_1 + a_2 + a_3 + \ldots = 0 \)[/tex]
- This is indeed true based on our equation, as it implies the sum of all coefficients (with the same signs) results in zero.
3. [tex]\( a^2 + b + 1 = 0 \)[/tex]
- This has no relevant connection to the polynomial relationship described.
4. [tex]\( a_1 - a_2 - a_3 - \ldots = 0 \)[/tex]
- This would need to include alternating signs correctly to match our earlier equation but doesn't.
Therefore, the correct statement is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{2} \][/tex]
Thanks for using our platform. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Discover more at Westonci.ca. Return for the latest expert answers and updates on various topics.
