Westonci.ca is the Q&A platform that connects you with experts who provide accurate and detailed answers. Our Q&A platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from experts in various disciplines. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.
Sagot :
Final answer:
An inductive argument relies on similarities between two things to draw a conclusion. Analogical arguments depend on the strength of the comparison and the number of similarities to be considered strong.
Explanation:
An argument whose conclusion rests on a similarity between two things or situations is termed as an inductive argument. In an analogical argument, similarities between two things are noted, and a conclusion is drawn based on this comparison.
For instance, when inferring the reliability of a new Subaru based on past experiences with other Subarus, the reasoning relies on analogy. The strength of such inductive arguments depends on the relevance and number of similarities between the compared items.
Analogical arguments need a solid reference class and significant similarities to be considered strong inductive arguments.
Learn more about Inductive reasoning and analogical arguments here:
https://brainly.com/question/43390007
We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Thank you for choosing Westonci.ca as your information source. We look forward to your next visit.