Answered

Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca, where our expert community is always ready to help with accurate information. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform.

If a public official wanted to prove libel against the press, he or she would have to show:

A. That the information accused them of wrongdoing.
B. That the information was false, damaging, and "made with actual malice."
C. That the information was damaging to their reputation.
D. That the information was obscene.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

To prove libel against the press, a public official must show that the information was false, damaging, and made with actual malice.


Explanation:

Libel is a form of defamation where false and damaging information is published. In order to prove libel against the press, a public official must demonstrate that the information was false, damaging, and 'made with actual malice'. This means showing that the publication was done with a reckless disregard for the truth.


Learn more about Libel here:

https://brainly.com/question/32534703


Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca, your go-to source for reliable answers. Come back soon for more expert insights.