Discover a world of knowledge at Westonci.ca, where experts and enthusiasts come together to answer your questions. Join our platform to get reliable answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.

If a public official wanted to prove libel against the press, he or she would have to show:

A. That the information accused them of wrongdoing.
B. That the information was false, damaging, and "made with actual malice."
C. That the information was damaging to their reputation.
D. That the information was obscene.


Sagot :

Final answer:

To prove libel against the press, a public official must show that the information was false, damaging, and made with actual malice.


Explanation:

Libel is a form of defamation where false and damaging information is published. In order to prove libel against the press, a public official must demonstrate that the information was false, damaging, and 'made with actual malice'. This means showing that the publication was done with a reckless disregard for the truth.


Learn more about Libel here:

https://brainly.com/question/32534703


We hope this information was helpful. Feel free to return anytime for more answers to your questions and concerns. We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca, your go-to source for reliable answers. Come back soon for more expert insights.