Answered

Explore Westonci.ca, the leading Q&A site where experts provide accurate and helpful answers to all your questions. Join our platform to get reliable answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts. Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform.

If a public official wanted to prove libel against the press, he or she would have to show:

A. That the information accused them of wrongdoing.
B. That the information was false, damaging, and "made with actual malice."
C. That the information was damaging to their reputation.
D. That the information was obscene.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

To prove libel against the press, a public official must show that the information was false, damaging, and made with actual malice.


Explanation:

Libel is a form of defamation where false and damaging information is published. In order to prove libel against the press, a public official must demonstrate that the information was false, damaging, and 'made with actual malice'. This means showing that the publication was done with a reckless disregard for the truth.


Learn more about Libel here:

https://brainly.com/question/32534703


Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Westonci.ca is your go-to source for reliable answers. Return soon for more expert insights.