Explore Westonci.ca, the top Q&A platform where your questions are answered by professionals and enthusiasts alike. Our platform connects you with professionals ready to provide precise answers to all your questions in various areas of expertise. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.

Which ordered pair needs to be removed in order for the mapping to represent a function?

A. [tex]$(-3,-4)$[/tex]
B. [tex]$(-2,-1)$[/tex]
C. [tex]$(1,-3)$[/tex]
D. [tex]$(3,7)$[/tex]


Sagot :

To determine which ordered pair, if any, needs to be removed for the mapping to represent a function, we must verify the definition of a function. In mathematics, a function is defined as a relationship where each input [tex]\( x \)[/tex] has a unique output [tex]\( y \)[/tex].

1. Let's list the given ordered pairs:
[tex]\[ (-3, -4), (-2, -1), (1, -3), (3, 7) \][/tex]

2. Extract and list the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-values from these pairs:
[tex]\[ -3, -2, 1, 3 \][/tex]

3. Determine if any [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-values are repeated:
- [tex]\( -3 \)[/tex] appears once.
- [tex]\( -2 \)[/tex] appears once.
- [tex]\( 1 \)[/tex] appears once.
- [tex]\( 3 \)[/tex] appears once.

Since all [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-values are unique, each input is associated with exactly one output. Therefore, no repeated [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-values exist among the ordered pairs. This confirms that the relationship as given already satisfies the definition of a function.

Thus, there is no need to remove any ordered pair. The mapping already represents a function.

So, the conclusion is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{\text{None}} \][/tex]