Welcome to Westonci.ca, the place where your questions are answered by a community of knowledgeable contributors. Explore thousands of questions and answers from a knowledgeable community of experts on our user-friendly platform. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.

Which ordered pair needs to be removed in order for the mapping to represent a function?

A. [tex]$(-3,-4)$[/tex]
B. [tex]$(-2,-1)$[/tex]
C. [tex]$(1,-3)$[/tex]
D. [tex]$(3,7)$[/tex]

Sagot :

To determine which ordered pair, if any, needs to be removed for the mapping to represent a function, we must verify the definition of a function. In mathematics, a function is defined as a relationship where each input [tex]\( x \)[/tex] has a unique output [tex]\( y \)[/tex].

1. Let's list the given ordered pairs:
[tex]\[ (-3, -4), (-2, -1), (1, -3), (3, 7) \][/tex]

2. Extract and list the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-values from these pairs:
[tex]\[ -3, -2, 1, 3 \][/tex]

3. Determine if any [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-values are repeated:
- [tex]\( -3 \)[/tex] appears once.
- [tex]\( -2 \)[/tex] appears once.
- [tex]\( 1 \)[/tex] appears once.
- [tex]\( 3 \)[/tex] appears once.

Since all [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-values are unique, each input is associated with exactly one output. Therefore, no repeated [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-values exist among the ordered pairs. This confirms that the relationship as given already satisfies the definition of a function.

Thus, there is no need to remove any ordered pair. The mapping already represents a function.

So, the conclusion is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{\text{None}} \][/tex]