Explore Westonci.ca, the leading Q&A site where experts provide accurate and helpful answers to all your questions. Ask your questions and receive detailed answers from professionals with extensive experience in various fields. Connect with a community of professionals ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently.
Sagot :
To solve the system of inequalities, let's work through each inequality step-by-step.
### Inequality 1: [tex]\(6x - 21 \geq -3\)[/tex]
1. Add 21 to both sides to isolate the term containing [tex]\(x\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ 6x - 21 + 21 \geq -3 + 21 \][/tex]
Simplifying, we get:
[tex]\[ 6x \geq 18 \][/tex]
2. Divide both sides by 6:
[tex]\[ \frac{6x}{6} \geq \frac{18}{6} \][/tex]
Simplifying, we obtain:
[tex]\[ x \geq 3 \][/tex]
### Inequality 2: [tex]\(14x + 11 < -17 \)[/tex]
1. Subtract 11 from both sides to isolate the term containing [tex]\(x\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ 14x + 11 - 11 < -17 - 11 \][/tex]
Simplifying, we get:
[tex]\[ 14x < -28 \][/tex]
2. Divide both sides by 14:
[tex]\[ \frac{14x}{14} < \frac{-28}{14} \][/tex]
Simplifying, we obtain:
[tex]\[ x < -2 \][/tex]
### Intersection of the Solution Sets
Now, let's find the intersection of the solution sets from both inequalities:
- From the first inequality, we have [tex]\(x \geq 3\)[/tex].
- From the second inequality, we have [tex]\(x < -2\)[/tex].
There is no value of [tex]\(x\)[/tex] that can simultaneously satisfy [tex]\(x \geq 3\)[/tex] and [tex]\(x < -2\)[/tex]. Therefore, the solution set is the empty set.
### Conclusion
There are no real numbers [tex]\(x\)[/tex] that simultaneously satisfy both inequalities. Thus, the solution is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{\text{There are no such real numbers.}} \][/tex]
### Inequality 1: [tex]\(6x - 21 \geq -3\)[/tex]
1. Add 21 to both sides to isolate the term containing [tex]\(x\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ 6x - 21 + 21 \geq -3 + 21 \][/tex]
Simplifying, we get:
[tex]\[ 6x \geq 18 \][/tex]
2. Divide both sides by 6:
[tex]\[ \frac{6x}{6} \geq \frac{18}{6} \][/tex]
Simplifying, we obtain:
[tex]\[ x \geq 3 \][/tex]
### Inequality 2: [tex]\(14x + 11 < -17 \)[/tex]
1. Subtract 11 from both sides to isolate the term containing [tex]\(x\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ 14x + 11 - 11 < -17 - 11 \][/tex]
Simplifying, we get:
[tex]\[ 14x < -28 \][/tex]
2. Divide both sides by 14:
[tex]\[ \frac{14x}{14} < \frac{-28}{14} \][/tex]
Simplifying, we obtain:
[tex]\[ x < -2 \][/tex]
### Intersection of the Solution Sets
Now, let's find the intersection of the solution sets from both inequalities:
- From the first inequality, we have [tex]\(x \geq 3\)[/tex].
- From the second inequality, we have [tex]\(x < -2\)[/tex].
There is no value of [tex]\(x\)[/tex] that can simultaneously satisfy [tex]\(x \geq 3\)[/tex] and [tex]\(x < -2\)[/tex]. Therefore, the solution set is the empty set.
### Conclusion
There are no real numbers [tex]\(x\)[/tex] that simultaneously satisfy both inequalities. Thus, the solution is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{\text{There are no such real numbers.}} \][/tex]
We hope our answers were helpful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you may have. Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thank you for trusting Westonci.ca. Don't forget to revisit us for more accurate and insightful answers.