Welcome to Westonci.ca, where finding answers to your questions is made simple by our community of experts. Connect with a community of professionals ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently. Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform.

Given the current expression is nonsensical, it should be corrected for clarity. A plausible correction could be:

Solve for [tex]\( m \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ 0 = 16 + 4(m - 6) \][/tex]


Sagot :

Certainly! Let's solve the equation step-by-step.

The given equation is:
[tex]\[ 0 = 16 + 4(m - 6) \][/tex]

First, let's simplify the expression inside the parentheses:
[tex]\[ m - 6 \][/tex]

Next, distribute the 4 to both terms inside the parentheses:
[tex]\[ 4(m - 6) = 4m - 24 \][/tex]

Now, substitute this back into the equation:
[tex]\[ 0 = 16 + 4m - 24 \][/tex]

Combine the constant terms (16 and -24) on the right side:
[tex]\[ 16 - 24 = -8 \][/tex]
So, the equation becomes:
[tex]\[ 0 = 4m - 8 \][/tex]

To isolate the term with [tex]\(m\)[/tex], move the -8 to the other side by adding 8 to both sides of the equation:
[tex]\[ 0 + 8 = 4m - 8 + 8 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ 8 = 4m \][/tex]

Now, solve for [tex]\(m\)[/tex] by dividing both sides of the equation by 4:
[tex]\[ \frac{8}{4} = \frac{4m}{4} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ 2 = m \][/tex]

Hence, the solution to the equation is:
[tex]\[ m = 2 \][/tex]
Thank you for visiting our platform. We hope you found the answers you were looking for. Come back anytime you need more information. We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Westonci.ca is committed to providing accurate answers. Come back soon for more trustworthy information.