Looking for trustworthy answers? Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform where experts share their knowledge on various topics. Discover detailed solutions to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Connect with a community of professionals ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently.

Given the current expression is nonsensical, it should be corrected for clarity. A plausible correction could be:

Solve for [tex]\( m \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ 0 = 16 + 4(m - 6) \][/tex]


Sagot :

Certainly! Let's solve the equation step-by-step.

The given equation is:
[tex]\[ 0 = 16 + 4(m - 6) \][/tex]

First, let's simplify the expression inside the parentheses:
[tex]\[ m - 6 \][/tex]

Next, distribute the 4 to both terms inside the parentheses:
[tex]\[ 4(m - 6) = 4m - 24 \][/tex]

Now, substitute this back into the equation:
[tex]\[ 0 = 16 + 4m - 24 \][/tex]

Combine the constant terms (16 and -24) on the right side:
[tex]\[ 16 - 24 = -8 \][/tex]
So, the equation becomes:
[tex]\[ 0 = 4m - 8 \][/tex]

To isolate the term with [tex]\(m\)[/tex], move the -8 to the other side by adding 8 to both sides of the equation:
[tex]\[ 0 + 8 = 4m - 8 + 8 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ 8 = 4m \][/tex]

Now, solve for [tex]\(m\)[/tex] by dividing both sides of the equation by 4:
[tex]\[ \frac{8}{4} = \frac{4m}{4} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ 2 = m \][/tex]

Hence, the solution to the equation is:
[tex]\[ m = 2 \][/tex]
Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. Westonci.ca is committed to providing accurate answers. Come back soon for more trustworthy information.