Find the best answers to your questions at Westonci.ca, where experts and enthusiasts provide accurate, reliable information. Discover comprehensive answers to your questions from knowledgeable professionals on our user-friendly platform. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.

Given the current expression is nonsensical, it should be corrected for clarity. A plausible correction could be:

Solve for [tex]\( m \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ 0 = 16 + 4(m - 6) \][/tex]

Sagot :

Certainly! Let's solve the equation step-by-step.

The given equation is:
[tex]\[ 0 = 16 + 4(m - 6) \][/tex]

First, let's simplify the expression inside the parentheses:
[tex]\[ m - 6 \][/tex]

Next, distribute the 4 to both terms inside the parentheses:
[tex]\[ 4(m - 6) = 4m - 24 \][/tex]

Now, substitute this back into the equation:
[tex]\[ 0 = 16 + 4m - 24 \][/tex]

Combine the constant terms (16 and -24) on the right side:
[tex]\[ 16 - 24 = -8 \][/tex]
So, the equation becomes:
[tex]\[ 0 = 4m - 8 \][/tex]

To isolate the term with [tex]\(m\)[/tex], move the -8 to the other side by adding 8 to both sides of the equation:
[tex]\[ 0 + 8 = 4m - 8 + 8 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ 8 = 4m \][/tex]

Now, solve for [tex]\(m\)[/tex] by dividing both sides of the equation by 4:
[tex]\[ \frac{8}{4} = \frac{4m}{4} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ 2 = m \][/tex]

Hence, the solution to the equation is:
[tex]\[ m = 2 \][/tex]
Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed with our latest expert advice.