Answered

Find the best answers to your questions at Westonci.ca, where experts and enthusiasts provide accurate, reliable information. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.

Read the passage from the opinion of the court in Dred Scott v. Sandford, written by Justice Taney.

"The question before us is, whether the class of persons described in the plea in abatement compose a portion of this people, and are constituent members of this sovereignty? We think they are not, and that they are not included, and were not intended to be included, under the word 'citizens' in the Constitution, and can therefore claim none of the rights and privileges which that instrument provides for and secures to citizens of the United States. On the contrary, they were at that time considered as a subordinate and inferior class of beings, who had been subjugated by the dominant race, and, whether emancipated or not, yet remained subject to their authority, and had no rights or privileges but such as those who held the power and the Government might choose to grant them."

What is Taney's claim in this passage?

A. that Black people were covered by the Constitution's definition of citizen
B. that emancipated Black people had rights guaranteed by the government
C. that Black people were not part of the group considered citizens by the Constitution
D. that Black people would have to get the government's permission to be citizens

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

In the Dred Scott v. Sandford case, Chief Justice Taney asserted that Black people were not included in the Constitution's definition of citizens, denying them rights and privileges.


Explanation:

Taney's claim in this passage from the opinion of the court in Dred Scott v. Sandford is that Black people were not part of the group considered citizens by the Constitution. He argued that even emancipated Black individuals were viewed as subordinate and inferior, lacking the rights and privileges granted to citizens under the Constitution. Taney's stance perpetuated the idea of Black people as a separate and unequal class without the same legal protections.


Learn more about Dred Scott v. Sandford, Taney's claim, Black citizenship here:

https://brainly.com/question/30065327


We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca, your go-to source for reliable answers. Come back soon for more expert insights.