Discover a wealth of knowledge at Westonci.ca, where experts provide answers to your most pressing questions. Find reliable answers to your questions from a wide community of knowledgeable experts on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform.
Sagot :
Final answer:
In the Dred Scott v. Sandford case, Chief Justice Taney asserted that Black people were not included in the Constitution's definition of citizens, denying them rights and privileges.
Explanation:
Taney's claim in this passage from the opinion of the court in Dred Scott v. Sandford is that Black people were not part of the group considered citizens by the Constitution. He argued that even emancipated Black individuals were viewed as subordinate and inferior, lacking the rights and privileges granted to citizens under the Constitution. Taney's stance perpetuated the idea of Black people as a separate and unequal class without the same legal protections.
Learn more about Dred Scott v. Sandford, Taney's claim, Black citizenship here:
https://brainly.com/question/30065327
Thanks for using our platform. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. We're glad you visited Westonci.ca. Return anytime for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.