Discover a world of knowledge at Westonci.ca, where experts and enthusiasts come together to answer your questions. Get the answers you need quickly and accurately from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.
Sagot :
To solve this problem, we need to analyze the given linear function for Jessica's earnings, [tex]\(E(x) = 10x - 30\)[/tex], where [tex]\(x\)[/tex] represents the number of doors she knocks on during the week, and [tex]\(E(x)\)[/tex] is her earnings for the week in dollars.
The [tex]\(y\)[/tex]-intercept of a linear function in the form [tex]\(E(x) = mx + b\)[/tex] is the constant term [tex]\(b\)[/tex]. The [tex]\(y\)[/tex]-intercept represents the value of [tex]\(E(x)\)[/tex] when [tex]\(x = 0\)[/tex].
Given the function [tex]\(E(x) = 10x - 30\)[/tex]:
- The term [tex]\(10x\)[/tex] indicates that Jessica earns [tex]$10 for each door she knocks on. - The term \(-30\) represents the \(y\)-intercept, which is the value of her earnings when she does not knock on any doors (\(x = 0\)). Let's go through each option to determine if they are reasonable interpretations of the \(y\)-intercept: A. If she does not knock on any doors at all during the week, she will lose $[/tex]\[tex]$30$[/tex].
- When [tex]\(x = 0\)[/tex], [tex]\(E(0) = 10(0) - 30 = -30\)[/tex].
- This means if Jessica does not knock on any doors, her earnings for the week will be [tex]\(-\$30\)[/tex], indicating a loss of \[tex]$30 due to her expenses. - This is a reasonable interpretation. B. She can earn \$[/tex]10 per week even if she does not knock on any doors.
- When [tex]\(x = 0\)[/tex], [tex]\(E(0) = -30\)[/tex], not \[tex]$10. - This suggests that she does not earn any money if she does not knock on any doors; instead, she incurs a loss of \$[/tex]30.
- This is not a reasonable interpretation.
C. Her expenses are \[tex]$30 per week. - The \(-\$[/tex]30\) indicates that Jessica has fixed expenses of \[tex]$30 per week. - No matter how many doors she knocks on, she will always have to cover her \$[/tex]30 expenses to break even.
- This is a reasonable interpretation.
D. She will lose \[tex]$10 per week if she does not knock on any doors. - When she does not knock on any doors, she loses \$[/tex]30, not \$10.
- This does not correctly reflect the given equation.
- This is not a reasonable interpretation.
Therefore, the reasonable interpretations of the [tex]\(y\)[/tex]-intercept are options A and C.
The [tex]\(y\)[/tex]-intercept of a linear function in the form [tex]\(E(x) = mx + b\)[/tex] is the constant term [tex]\(b\)[/tex]. The [tex]\(y\)[/tex]-intercept represents the value of [tex]\(E(x)\)[/tex] when [tex]\(x = 0\)[/tex].
Given the function [tex]\(E(x) = 10x - 30\)[/tex]:
- The term [tex]\(10x\)[/tex] indicates that Jessica earns [tex]$10 for each door she knocks on. - The term \(-30\) represents the \(y\)-intercept, which is the value of her earnings when she does not knock on any doors (\(x = 0\)). Let's go through each option to determine if they are reasonable interpretations of the \(y\)-intercept: A. If she does not knock on any doors at all during the week, she will lose $[/tex]\[tex]$30$[/tex].
- When [tex]\(x = 0\)[/tex], [tex]\(E(0) = 10(0) - 30 = -30\)[/tex].
- This means if Jessica does not knock on any doors, her earnings for the week will be [tex]\(-\$30\)[/tex], indicating a loss of \[tex]$30 due to her expenses. - This is a reasonable interpretation. B. She can earn \$[/tex]10 per week even if she does not knock on any doors.
- When [tex]\(x = 0\)[/tex], [tex]\(E(0) = -30\)[/tex], not \[tex]$10. - This suggests that she does not earn any money if she does not knock on any doors; instead, she incurs a loss of \$[/tex]30.
- This is not a reasonable interpretation.
C. Her expenses are \[tex]$30 per week. - The \(-\$[/tex]30\) indicates that Jessica has fixed expenses of \[tex]$30 per week. - No matter how many doors she knocks on, she will always have to cover her \$[/tex]30 expenses to break even.
- This is a reasonable interpretation.
D. She will lose \[tex]$10 per week if she does not knock on any doors. - When she does not knock on any doors, she loses \$[/tex]30, not \$10.
- This does not correctly reflect the given equation.
- This is not a reasonable interpretation.
Therefore, the reasonable interpretations of the [tex]\(y\)[/tex]-intercept are options A and C.
We hope this information was helpful. Feel free to return anytime for more answers to your questions and concerns. Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. We're dedicated to helping you find the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Don't hesitate to return for more.