Get reliable answers to your questions at Westonci.ca, where our knowledgeable community is always ready to help. Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform.
Sagot :
Let's analyze each statement carefully using the information provided in the chart.
### Statement 1: All three cities benefitted from the construction of the Suez Canal.
To determine if all three cities benefitted from the Suez Canal, we need to compare the distances for each city using both routes:
- Constantinople:
- Suez Canal: 1,800 leagues
- Cape of Good Hope: 6,100 leagues
- Difference: 6,100 - 1,800 = 4,300 leagues
- London:
- Suez Canal: 3,100 leagues
- Cape of Good Hope: 5,950 leagues
- Difference: 5,950 - 3,100 = 2,850 leagues
- New York:
- Suez Canal: 3,761 leagues
- Cape of Good Hope: 6,200 leagues
- Difference: 6,200 - 3,761 = 2,439 leagues
Since the distances via the Suez Canal are shorter for all three cities compared to the Cape of Good Hope route, all three cities benefitted from the construction of the Suez Canal.
### Statement 2: It was faster for ships from New York to travel by the Cape of Good Hope.
To determine if it was faster for ships from New York to travel by the Cape of Good Hope, we compare the distances for New York:
- New York via Suez Canal: 3,761 leagues
- New York via Cape of Good Hope: 6,200 leagues
Since 3,761 leagues (Suez Canal) is less than 6,200 leagues (Cape of Good Hope), it is not true that it was faster for ships from New York to travel by the Cape of Good Hope. Hence, this statement is false.
### Statement 3: Ships from London saved no time using the Suez Canal.
To determine if ships from London saved time using the Suez Canal, we compare the distances for London:
- London via Suez Canal: 3,100 leagues
- London via Cape of Good Hope: 5,950 leagues
Since 5,950 leagues is greater than 3,100 leagues, ships from London did save time using the Suez Canal. Therefore, this statement is false.
### Statement 4: Ships from New York benefitted the most by traveling through the canal.
To determine which city benefitted the most, we compare the differences in the distances saved:
- Constantinople: 4,300 leagues saved
- London: 2,850 leagues saved
- New York: 2,439 leagues saved
Since Constantinople saved the most distance (4,300 leagues), it is not true that ships from New York benefitted the most. Hence, this statement is false.
### Summary
Based on the analysis above, only the first statement is supported by the information in the chart:
- All three cities benefitted from the construction of the Suez Canal. (True)
The other statements are false.
### Statement 1: All three cities benefitted from the construction of the Suez Canal.
To determine if all three cities benefitted from the Suez Canal, we need to compare the distances for each city using both routes:
- Constantinople:
- Suez Canal: 1,800 leagues
- Cape of Good Hope: 6,100 leagues
- Difference: 6,100 - 1,800 = 4,300 leagues
- London:
- Suez Canal: 3,100 leagues
- Cape of Good Hope: 5,950 leagues
- Difference: 5,950 - 3,100 = 2,850 leagues
- New York:
- Suez Canal: 3,761 leagues
- Cape of Good Hope: 6,200 leagues
- Difference: 6,200 - 3,761 = 2,439 leagues
Since the distances via the Suez Canal are shorter for all three cities compared to the Cape of Good Hope route, all three cities benefitted from the construction of the Suez Canal.
### Statement 2: It was faster for ships from New York to travel by the Cape of Good Hope.
To determine if it was faster for ships from New York to travel by the Cape of Good Hope, we compare the distances for New York:
- New York via Suez Canal: 3,761 leagues
- New York via Cape of Good Hope: 6,200 leagues
Since 3,761 leagues (Suez Canal) is less than 6,200 leagues (Cape of Good Hope), it is not true that it was faster for ships from New York to travel by the Cape of Good Hope. Hence, this statement is false.
### Statement 3: Ships from London saved no time using the Suez Canal.
To determine if ships from London saved time using the Suez Canal, we compare the distances for London:
- London via Suez Canal: 3,100 leagues
- London via Cape of Good Hope: 5,950 leagues
Since 5,950 leagues is greater than 3,100 leagues, ships from London did save time using the Suez Canal. Therefore, this statement is false.
### Statement 4: Ships from New York benefitted the most by traveling through the canal.
To determine which city benefitted the most, we compare the differences in the distances saved:
- Constantinople: 4,300 leagues saved
- London: 2,850 leagues saved
- New York: 2,439 leagues saved
Since Constantinople saved the most distance (4,300 leagues), it is not true that ships from New York benefitted the most. Hence, this statement is false.
### Summary
Based on the analysis above, only the first statement is supported by the information in the chart:
- All three cities benefitted from the construction of the Suez Canal. (True)
The other statements are false.
Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Your questions are important to us at Westonci.ca. Visit again for expert answers and reliable information.
