Welcome to Westonci.ca, the Q&A platform where your questions are met with detailed answers from experienced experts. Get quick and reliable answers to your questions from a dedicated community of professionals on our platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.
Sagot :
To determine the most suitable universal set for performing set operations on the sets [tex]\( A \)[/tex] and [tex]\( B \)[/tex], let's closely examine the elements of each set and compare them to the given sets.
Set [tex]\( A \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ A = \{-1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20\} \][/tex]
Set [tex]\( B \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ B = \left\{0, 3, \frac{10}{3}, 1\right\} \][/tex]
Now, let's analyze both sets in light of the provided options for the universal set:
- Option A: The set of natural numbers:
- Natural numbers include [tex]\(\{1, 2, 3, 4, \ldots\}\)[/tex].
- However, neither [tex]\( -1 \)[/tex] nor [tex]\( 0 \)[/tex] nor fractional numbers (like [tex]\(\frac{10}{3}\)[/tex]) are natural numbers.
- Since [tex]\( -1 \)[/tex] and [tex]\(\frac{10}{3}\)[/tex] are included in sets [tex]\( A \)[/tex] and [tex]\( B \)[/tex], natural numbers are not sufficient as a universal set.
- Option B: The set of integer numbers:
- Integers include [tex]\(\{\ldots, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, \ldots\}\)[/tex].
- While integers cover most elements, they do not include fractional numbers such as [tex]\(\frac{10}{3}\)[/tex].
- Therefore, the set of integers is not comprehensive enough, given [tex]\(\frac{10}{3}\)[/tex] in set [tex]\( B \)[/tex].
- Option C: The set of irrational numbers:
- Irrational numbers include numbers like [tex]\(\pi\)[/tex] and [tex]\(\sqrt{2}\)[/tex], which cannot be expressed as a ratio of two integers.
- Because none of the elements in sets [tex]\( A \)[/tex] and [tex]\( B \)[/tex] are irrational numbers, irrational numbers cannot serve as the universal set.
- Option D: The set of rational numbers:
- Rational numbers are numbers that can be expressed as a ratio of two integers, which includes integers and fractions.
- The set [tex]\(\{-1, 1, 2, 3, ..., 20\}\)[/tex] in set [tex]\( A \)[/tex] and the set [tex]\(\{0, 3, \frac{10}{3}, 1\}\)[/tex] in set [tex]\( B \)[/tex] are all rational numbers.
- Therefore, the rational numbers set comprehensively covers all elements in both sets [tex]\( A \)[/tex] and [tex]\( B \)[/tex].
Given the analysis, the set of rational numbers is the best choice as the universal set for performing set operations on sets [tex]\( A \)[/tex] and [tex]\( B \)[/tex].
Thus, the answer is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{4} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ \text{D. The set of rational numbers.} \][/tex]
Set [tex]\( A \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ A = \{-1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20\} \][/tex]
Set [tex]\( B \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ B = \left\{0, 3, \frac{10}{3}, 1\right\} \][/tex]
Now, let's analyze both sets in light of the provided options for the universal set:
- Option A: The set of natural numbers:
- Natural numbers include [tex]\(\{1, 2, 3, 4, \ldots\}\)[/tex].
- However, neither [tex]\( -1 \)[/tex] nor [tex]\( 0 \)[/tex] nor fractional numbers (like [tex]\(\frac{10}{3}\)[/tex]) are natural numbers.
- Since [tex]\( -1 \)[/tex] and [tex]\(\frac{10}{3}\)[/tex] are included in sets [tex]\( A \)[/tex] and [tex]\( B \)[/tex], natural numbers are not sufficient as a universal set.
- Option B: The set of integer numbers:
- Integers include [tex]\(\{\ldots, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, \ldots\}\)[/tex].
- While integers cover most elements, they do not include fractional numbers such as [tex]\(\frac{10}{3}\)[/tex].
- Therefore, the set of integers is not comprehensive enough, given [tex]\(\frac{10}{3}\)[/tex] in set [tex]\( B \)[/tex].
- Option C: The set of irrational numbers:
- Irrational numbers include numbers like [tex]\(\pi\)[/tex] and [tex]\(\sqrt{2}\)[/tex], which cannot be expressed as a ratio of two integers.
- Because none of the elements in sets [tex]\( A \)[/tex] and [tex]\( B \)[/tex] are irrational numbers, irrational numbers cannot serve as the universal set.
- Option D: The set of rational numbers:
- Rational numbers are numbers that can be expressed as a ratio of two integers, which includes integers and fractions.
- The set [tex]\(\{-1, 1, 2, 3, ..., 20\}\)[/tex] in set [tex]\( A \)[/tex] and the set [tex]\(\{0, 3, \frac{10}{3}, 1\}\)[/tex] in set [tex]\( B \)[/tex] are all rational numbers.
- Therefore, the rational numbers set comprehensively covers all elements in both sets [tex]\( A \)[/tex] and [tex]\( B \)[/tex].
Given the analysis, the set of rational numbers is the best choice as the universal set for performing set operations on sets [tex]\( A \)[/tex] and [tex]\( B \)[/tex].
Thus, the answer is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{4} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ \text{D. The set of rational numbers.} \][/tex]
We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Stay curious and keep coming back to Westonci.ca for answers to all your burning questions.