Answered

Discover the answers you need at Westonci.ca, where experts provide clear and concise information on various topics. Connect with professionals ready to provide precise answers to your questions on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform.

Read the passage from the opinion of the court in Dred Scott v. Sandford, written by Justice Taney:

"The question before us is, whether the class of persons described in the plea in abatement compose a portion of this people, and are constituent members of this sovereignty? We think they are not, and that they are not included, and were not intended to be included, under the word 'citizens' in the Constitution, and can therefore claim none of the rights and privileges which that instrument provides for and secures to citizens of the United States. On the contrary, they were at that time considered as a subordinate and inferior class of beings, who had been subjugated by the dominant race, and, whether emancipated or not, yet remained subject to their authority, and had no rights or privileges but such as those who held the power and the Government might choose to grant them."

Which statement best describes the fallacy in this passage?

A. Justice Taney assumes that the writers of the Constitution would agree with him about citizenship.
B. Justice Taney uses the argument that Black people are not citizens to prove that they are not citizens.
C. Justice Taney assumes that the other justices on the court would agree with him about citizenship.
D. Justice Taney uses the argument that Dred Scott is an enslaved person to prove that he is not a citizen.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

Justice Taney's fallacy in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case was his assumption that enslaved individuals were not considered citizens under the Constitution, leading to the denial of their rights.


Explanation:

Justice Taney in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case wrongly assumed that enslaved individuals were not intended to be included as citizens under the Constitution, leading to the fallacy that they had no rights as citizens despite being born in the United States.

By using the argument that Black people were not citizens to deny them rights and privileges, Taney perpetuated the misconception that they were inferior and subject to the authority of the dominant race.

Chief Justice Taney's decision was a landmark ruling that highlighted the deep-rooted racial biases of the time, reinforcing the notion that Black people were not entitled to citizenship or civil rights.


Learn more about Dred Scott v. Sandford case here:

https://brainly.com/question/41672761


Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Thank you for using Westonci.ca. Come back for more in-depth answers to all your queries.