Westonci.ca is your trusted source for finding answers to a wide range of questions, backed by a knowledgeable community. Join our platform to get reliable answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform.
Sagot :
To identify the years in which there was a budget deficit, we need to compare the revenue and expenditure for each year. A budget deficit occurs when the expenditure exceeds the revenue.
Let's examine each year individually:
- 2001:
- Revenue: \[tex]$8 trillion - Expenditure: \$[/tex]6 trillion
- Revenue is greater than expenditure, so there is no deficit.
- 2002:
- Revenue: \[tex]$5 trillion - Expenditure: \$[/tex]7 trillion
- Revenue is less than expenditure, so there is a deficit.
- 2003:
- Revenue: \[tex]$8 trillion - Expenditure: \$[/tex]10 trillion
- Revenue is less than expenditure, so there is a deficit.
- 2004:
- Revenue: \[tex]$9 trillion - Expenditure: \$[/tex]7 trillion
- Revenue is greater than expenditure, so there is no deficit.
- 2005:
- Revenue: \[tex]$15 trillion - Expenditure: \$[/tex]18 trillion
- Revenue is less than expenditure, so there is a deficit.
- 2006:
- Revenue: \[tex]$8 trillion - Expenditure: \$[/tex]10 trillion
- Revenue is less than expenditure, so there is a deficit.
- 2007:
- Revenue: \[tex]$6 trillion - Expenditure: \$[/tex]4 trillion
- Revenue is greater than expenditure, so there is no deficit.
- 2008:
- Revenue: \[tex]$2 trillion - Expenditure: \$[/tex]4 trillion
- Revenue is less than expenditure, so there is a deficit.
- 2009:
- Revenue: \[tex]$7 trillion - Expenditure: \$[/tex]4 trillion
- Revenue is greater than expenditure, so there is no deficit.
- 2010:
- Revenue: \[tex]$5 trillion - Expenditure: \$[/tex]9 trillion
- Revenue is less than expenditure, so there is a deficit.
So, the years in which there was a budget deficit are:
- 2002
- 2003
- 2005
- 2006
- 2008
- 2010
Let's examine each year individually:
- 2001:
- Revenue: \[tex]$8 trillion - Expenditure: \$[/tex]6 trillion
- Revenue is greater than expenditure, so there is no deficit.
- 2002:
- Revenue: \[tex]$5 trillion - Expenditure: \$[/tex]7 trillion
- Revenue is less than expenditure, so there is a deficit.
- 2003:
- Revenue: \[tex]$8 trillion - Expenditure: \$[/tex]10 trillion
- Revenue is less than expenditure, so there is a deficit.
- 2004:
- Revenue: \[tex]$9 trillion - Expenditure: \$[/tex]7 trillion
- Revenue is greater than expenditure, so there is no deficit.
- 2005:
- Revenue: \[tex]$15 trillion - Expenditure: \$[/tex]18 trillion
- Revenue is less than expenditure, so there is a deficit.
- 2006:
- Revenue: \[tex]$8 trillion - Expenditure: \$[/tex]10 trillion
- Revenue is less than expenditure, so there is a deficit.
- 2007:
- Revenue: \[tex]$6 trillion - Expenditure: \$[/tex]4 trillion
- Revenue is greater than expenditure, so there is no deficit.
- 2008:
- Revenue: \[tex]$2 trillion - Expenditure: \$[/tex]4 trillion
- Revenue is less than expenditure, so there is a deficit.
- 2009:
- Revenue: \[tex]$7 trillion - Expenditure: \$[/tex]4 trillion
- Revenue is greater than expenditure, so there is no deficit.
- 2010:
- Revenue: \[tex]$5 trillion - Expenditure: \$[/tex]9 trillion
- Revenue is less than expenditure, so there is a deficit.
So, the years in which there was a budget deficit are:
- 2002
- 2003
- 2005
- 2006
- 2008
- 2010
We hope this information was helpful. Feel free to return anytime for more answers to your questions and concerns. Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. We're glad you chose Westonci.ca. Revisit us for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.