Get reliable answers to your questions at Westonci.ca, where our knowledgeable community is always ready to help. Join our Q&A platform to get precise answers from experts in diverse fields and enhance your understanding. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals.
Sagot :
To identify the years in which there was a budget deficit, we need to compare the revenue and expenditure for each year. A budget deficit occurs when the expenditure exceeds the revenue.
Let's examine each year individually:
- 2001:
- Revenue: \[tex]$8 trillion - Expenditure: \$[/tex]6 trillion
- Revenue is greater than expenditure, so there is no deficit.
- 2002:
- Revenue: \[tex]$5 trillion - Expenditure: \$[/tex]7 trillion
- Revenue is less than expenditure, so there is a deficit.
- 2003:
- Revenue: \[tex]$8 trillion - Expenditure: \$[/tex]10 trillion
- Revenue is less than expenditure, so there is a deficit.
- 2004:
- Revenue: \[tex]$9 trillion - Expenditure: \$[/tex]7 trillion
- Revenue is greater than expenditure, so there is no deficit.
- 2005:
- Revenue: \[tex]$15 trillion - Expenditure: \$[/tex]18 trillion
- Revenue is less than expenditure, so there is a deficit.
- 2006:
- Revenue: \[tex]$8 trillion - Expenditure: \$[/tex]10 trillion
- Revenue is less than expenditure, so there is a deficit.
- 2007:
- Revenue: \[tex]$6 trillion - Expenditure: \$[/tex]4 trillion
- Revenue is greater than expenditure, so there is no deficit.
- 2008:
- Revenue: \[tex]$2 trillion - Expenditure: \$[/tex]4 trillion
- Revenue is less than expenditure, so there is a deficit.
- 2009:
- Revenue: \[tex]$7 trillion - Expenditure: \$[/tex]4 trillion
- Revenue is greater than expenditure, so there is no deficit.
- 2010:
- Revenue: \[tex]$5 trillion - Expenditure: \$[/tex]9 trillion
- Revenue is less than expenditure, so there is a deficit.
So, the years in which there was a budget deficit are:
- 2002
- 2003
- 2005
- 2006
- 2008
- 2010
Let's examine each year individually:
- 2001:
- Revenue: \[tex]$8 trillion - Expenditure: \$[/tex]6 trillion
- Revenue is greater than expenditure, so there is no deficit.
- 2002:
- Revenue: \[tex]$5 trillion - Expenditure: \$[/tex]7 trillion
- Revenue is less than expenditure, so there is a deficit.
- 2003:
- Revenue: \[tex]$8 trillion - Expenditure: \$[/tex]10 trillion
- Revenue is less than expenditure, so there is a deficit.
- 2004:
- Revenue: \[tex]$9 trillion - Expenditure: \$[/tex]7 trillion
- Revenue is greater than expenditure, so there is no deficit.
- 2005:
- Revenue: \[tex]$15 trillion - Expenditure: \$[/tex]18 trillion
- Revenue is less than expenditure, so there is a deficit.
- 2006:
- Revenue: \[tex]$8 trillion - Expenditure: \$[/tex]10 trillion
- Revenue is less than expenditure, so there is a deficit.
- 2007:
- Revenue: \[tex]$6 trillion - Expenditure: \$[/tex]4 trillion
- Revenue is greater than expenditure, so there is no deficit.
- 2008:
- Revenue: \[tex]$2 trillion - Expenditure: \$[/tex]4 trillion
- Revenue is less than expenditure, so there is a deficit.
- 2009:
- Revenue: \[tex]$7 trillion - Expenditure: \$[/tex]4 trillion
- Revenue is greater than expenditure, so there is no deficit.
- 2010:
- Revenue: \[tex]$5 trillion - Expenditure: \$[/tex]9 trillion
- Revenue is less than expenditure, so there is a deficit.
So, the years in which there was a budget deficit are:
- 2002
- 2003
- 2005
- 2006
- 2008
- 2010
We appreciate your visit. Hopefully, the answers you found were beneficial. Don't hesitate to come back for more information. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Keep exploring Westonci.ca for more insightful answers to your questions. We're here to help.