Westonci.ca makes finding answers easy, with a community of experts ready to provide you with the information you seek. Experience the convenience of getting reliable answers to your questions from a vast network of knowledgeable experts. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.

This table shows data collected by a runner.

\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|}
\hline
\begin{tabular}{c}
Time \\
[tex]$( \text{min} )$[/tex]
\end{tabular} &
\begin{tabular}{c}
Distance \\
[tex]$( \text{mi} )$[/tex]
\end{tabular} &
\begin{tabular}{c}
Elevation \\
[tex]$( \text{m} )$[/tex]
\end{tabular} \\
\hline
1 & 0.19 & 12 \\
\hline
2 & 0.38 & 26 \\
\hline
3 & 0.57 & 67 \\
\hline
4 & 0.76 & 98 \\
\hline
5 & 0.95 & 124 \\
\hline
6 & 1.14 & 145 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}

Which statement about the scenario represented in the table is true?

A. The distance run is a nonlinear function because it does not have a constant rate of change.
B. The elevation is a nonlinear function because it does not have a constant rate of change.
C. Both the distance run and the elevation are nonlinear functions because they do not have constant rates of change.
D. Both the distance run and the elevation are linear functions.


Sagot :

Let's analyze the data provided in the table to determine whether the distance run and the elevation are linear or nonlinear functions.

### Step 1: Understanding Linear and Nonlinear Functions
A linear function exhibits a constant rate of change. This means that the difference between consecutive values of the dependent variable (distance or elevation) should be constant when the independent variable (time) changes by a consistent amount.

### Step 2: Analyzing Distance
We need to calculate the rate of change in distance for each consecutive time interval:
[tex]\[ \begin{align*} \text{Rate from } t = 1 \text{ to } t = 2 & : 0.38 - 0.19 = 0.19 \\ \text{Rate from } t = 2 \text{ to } t = 3 & : 0.57 - 0.38 = 0.19 \\ \text{Rate from } t = 3 \text{ to } t = 4 & : 0.76 - 0.57 = 0.19 \\ \text{Rate from } t = 4 \text{ to } t = 5 & : 0.95 - 0.76 = 0.19 \\ \text{Rate from } t = 5 \text{ to } t = 6 & : 1.14 - 0.95 = 0.19 \\ \end{align*} \][/tex]
Since all the rates of change in distance are the same (0.19), the distance is a linear function of time.

### Step 3: Analyzing Elevation
Next, we calculate the rate of change in elevation for each consecutive time interval:
[tex]\[ \begin{align*} \text{Rate from } t = 1 \text{ to } t = 2 & : 26 - 12 = 14 \\ \text{Rate from } t = 2 \text{ to } t = 3 & : 67 - 26 = 41 \\ \text{Rate from } t = 3 \text{ to } t = 4 & : 98 - 67 = 31 \\ \text{Rate from } t = 4 \text{ to } t = 5 & : 124 - 98 = 26 \\ \text{Rate from } t = 5 \text{ to } t = 6 & : 145 - 124 = 21 \\ \end{align*} \][/tex]
These differences are not constant, so the elevation as a function of time is nonlinear.

### Step 4: Final Conclusion
Based on the analysis:
- The distance run is a linear function since it has a constant rate of change.
- The elevation is a nonlinear function since it does not have a constant rate of change.

Thus, the correct statement is:
"Both the distance run and the elevation are nonlinear functions because they do not have constant rates of change."