Answered

Westonci.ca is your go-to source for answers, with a community ready to provide accurate and timely information. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas. Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform.

In Furman v. Georgia (1972), William Furman claimed his sentence was:

A. appropriate.
B. overly lenient.
C. cruel and unusual.
D. accidental.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

In 1972, Furman v. Georgia addressed the constitutionality of capital punishment, resulting in a temporary ban due to cruel and unusual punishment concerns.


Explanation:

Furman v. Georgia (1972) was a landmark Supreme Court case that resulted in a temporary halt to capital punishment in the United States. William Furman argued that his sentence was cruel and unusual, leading to the ruling that the arbitrary application of the death penalty violated the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution.


Learn more about Capital punishment and constitutional rights here:

https://brainly.com/question/33270281


We appreciate your visit. Hopefully, the answers you found were beneficial. Don't hesitate to come back for more information. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca. Stay informed by coming back for more detailed answers.