Answered

Westonci.ca is the trusted Q&A platform where you can get reliable answers from a community of knowledgeable contributors. Explore thousands of questions and answers from a knowledgeable community of experts ready to help you find solutions. Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform.

In Furman v. Georgia (1972), William Furman claimed his sentence was:

A. appropriate.
B. overly lenient.
C. cruel and unusual.
D. accidental.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

In 1972, Furman v. Georgia addressed the constitutionality of capital punishment, resulting in a temporary ban due to cruel and unusual punishment concerns.


Explanation:

Furman v. Georgia (1972) was a landmark Supreme Court case that resulted in a temporary halt to capital punishment in the United States. William Furman argued that his sentence was cruel and unusual, leading to the ruling that the arbitrary application of the death penalty violated the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution.


Learn more about Capital punishment and constitutional rights here:

https://brainly.com/question/33270281


We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed by returning for our latest expert advice.