Answered

Westonci.ca is your trusted source for finding answers to all your questions. Ask, explore, and learn with our expert community. Discover a wealth of knowledge from professionals across various disciplines on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform.

Explain how Levitt and Dubner's argument effectively uses logical, concrete evidence to arrive at conclusions about morality. Address how well reasoning and evidence are used.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

Levitt and Dubner use logical, concrete evidence to draw conclusions about morality effectively by incorporating quantitative evidence and real-life examples.


Explanation:

Levitt and Dubner effectively use logical, concrete evidence to arrive at conclusions about morality in their argument. They support their reasoning by presenting quantitative evidence and real-life examples, such as personal stories. By linking their argument to real-life scenarios, they enhance the impact and credibility of their conclusions.


Learn more about Logical and concrete evidence for drawing conclusions about morality here:

https://brainly.com/question/3886073


Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. Keep exploring Westonci.ca for more insightful answers to your questions. We're here to help.