Welcome to Westonci.ca, where curiosity meets expertise. Ask any question and receive fast, accurate answers from our knowledgeable community. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately.

In 2011, a U.S. Census report determined that [tex]$71\%$[/tex] of college students work. A researcher thinks this percentage has changed since then. A survey of 110 college students reported that 91 of them work. Is there evidence to support the researcher's claim at the [tex]$1\%$[/tex] significance level? A normal probability plot indicates that the population is normally distributed.

a) Determine the null and alternative hypotheses.

[tex]$
H_0: p = 0.71
$[/tex]

[tex]$
H_a: p \neq 0.71
$[/tex]

b) Determine the test statistic. Round to two decimals.

[tex]$
z = \square
$[/tex]

c) Find the [tex]$p$[/tex]-value. Round to 4 decimals.

[tex]$
p\text{-value} = \square
$[/tex]

d) Make a decision.

- Reject the null hypothesis
- Fail to reject the null hypothesis

e) Write the conclusion.

- There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the percentage of college students who work is different from [tex]$71\%$[/tex].
- There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the percentage of college students who work is different from [tex]$71\%$[/tex].


Sagot :

Let's go through the problem step-by-step:

a) Determine the null and alternative hypotheses.
- The null hypothesis ([tex]\(H_0\)[/tex]) represents the status quo or the current accepted value. In this case, it states that 71% of college students work.
[tex]\[ H_0: p = 0.71 \][/tex]

- The alternative hypothesis ([tex]\(H_a\)[/tex]) represents the claim being tested. The researcher thinks the percentage of college students who work has changed. So, the alternative hypothesis is:
[tex]\[ H_a: p \neq 0.71 \][/tex]

b) Determine the test statistic. Round to two decimals.
- To find the test statistic, we use the formula for the z-score in the context of proportions:
[tex]\[ z = \frac{\hat{p} - p_0}{\sqrt{\frac{p_0 (1 - p_0)}{n}}} \][/tex]
where:
[tex]\(\hat{p}\)[/tex] = sample proportion
[tex]\(p_0\)[/tex] = population proportion
[tex]\(n\)[/tex] = sample size

- Given:
[tex]\[ \hat{p} = \frac{91}{110} = 0.8273 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ p_0 = 0.71 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ n = 110 \][/tex]

- Calculating the standard error:
[tex]\[ SE = \sqrt{\frac{0.71 \times (1 - 0.71)}{110}} \approx 0.0425 \][/tex]

- Calculating the z-score:
[tex]\[ z = \frac{0.8273 - 0.71}{0.0425} \approx 2.76 \][/tex]

c) Find the p-value. Round to 4 decimals.
- To find the p-value associated with the calculated z-score for a two-tailed test:
[tex]\[ p\text{-value} = 2 \times P(Z > 2.76) \][/tex]

- Using standard normal distribution tables or computational tools, we find:
[tex]\[ p\text{-value} \approx 0.0057 \][/tex]

d) Make a decision.
- The significance level ([tex]\(\alpha\)[/tex]) is 0.01. We compare the p-value to the significance level:
[tex]\[ 0.0057 < 0.01 \][/tex]

- Since the p-value is less than the significance level, we reject the null hypothesis.

e) Write the conclusion.
- Given that we rejected the null hypothesis, we conclude that:
[tex]\[ \text{There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the percentage of college students who work is different than 71\%.} \][/tex]

Summary:
a) [tex]\(H_0: p = 0.71\)[/tex], [tex]\(H_a: p \neq 0.71\)[/tex]
b) [tex]\(z = 2.76\)[/tex]
c) [tex]\(p\text{-value} = 0.0057\)[/tex]
d) Reject the null hypothesis
e) There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the percentage of college students who work is different than 71\%.