Discover the best answers at Westonci.ca, where experts share their insights and knowledge with you. Get immediate answers to your questions from a wide network of experienced professionals on our Q&A platform. Connect with a community of professionals ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently.
Sagot :
Let's go through the problem step-by-step:
a) Determine the null and alternative hypotheses.
- The null hypothesis ([tex]\(H_0\)[/tex]) represents the status quo or the current accepted value. In this case, it states that 71% of college students work.
[tex]\[ H_0: p = 0.71 \][/tex]
- The alternative hypothesis ([tex]\(H_a\)[/tex]) represents the claim being tested. The researcher thinks the percentage of college students who work has changed. So, the alternative hypothesis is:
[tex]\[ H_a: p \neq 0.71 \][/tex]
b) Determine the test statistic. Round to two decimals.
- To find the test statistic, we use the formula for the z-score in the context of proportions:
[tex]\[ z = \frac{\hat{p} - p_0}{\sqrt{\frac{p_0 (1 - p_0)}{n}}} \][/tex]
where:
[tex]\(\hat{p}\)[/tex] = sample proportion
[tex]\(p_0\)[/tex] = population proportion
[tex]\(n\)[/tex] = sample size
- Given:
[tex]\[ \hat{p} = \frac{91}{110} = 0.8273 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ p_0 = 0.71 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ n = 110 \][/tex]
- Calculating the standard error:
[tex]\[ SE = \sqrt{\frac{0.71 \times (1 - 0.71)}{110}} \approx 0.0425 \][/tex]
- Calculating the z-score:
[tex]\[ z = \frac{0.8273 - 0.71}{0.0425} \approx 2.76 \][/tex]
c) Find the p-value. Round to 4 decimals.
- To find the p-value associated with the calculated z-score for a two-tailed test:
[tex]\[ p\text{-value} = 2 \times P(Z > 2.76) \][/tex]
- Using standard normal distribution tables or computational tools, we find:
[tex]\[ p\text{-value} \approx 0.0057 \][/tex]
d) Make a decision.
- The significance level ([tex]\(\alpha\)[/tex]) is 0.01. We compare the p-value to the significance level:
[tex]\[ 0.0057 < 0.01 \][/tex]
- Since the p-value is less than the significance level, we reject the null hypothesis.
e) Write the conclusion.
- Given that we rejected the null hypothesis, we conclude that:
[tex]\[ \text{There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the percentage of college students who work is different than 71\%.} \][/tex]
Summary:
a) [tex]\(H_0: p = 0.71\)[/tex], [tex]\(H_a: p \neq 0.71\)[/tex]
b) [tex]\(z = 2.76\)[/tex]
c) [tex]\(p\text{-value} = 0.0057\)[/tex]
d) Reject the null hypothesis
e) There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the percentage of college students who work is different than 71\%.
a) Determine the null and alternative hypotheses.
- The null hypothesis ([tex]\(H_0\)[/tex]) represents the status quo or the current accepted value. In this case, it states that 71% of college students work.
[tex]\[ H_0: p = 0.71 \][/tex]
- The alternative hypothesis ([tex]\(H_a\)[/tex]) represents the claim being tested. The researcher thinks the percentage of college students who work has changed. So, the alternative hypothesis is:
[tex]\[ H_a: p \neq 0.71 \][/tex]
b) Determine the test statistic. Round to two decimals.
- To find the test statistic, we use the formula for the z-score in the context of proportions:
[tex]\[ z = \frac{\hat{p} - p_0}{\sqrt{\frac{p_0 (1 - p_0)}{n}}} \][/tex]
where:
[tex]\(\hat{p}\)[/tex] = sample proportion
[tex]\(p_0\)[/tex] = population proportion
[tex]\(n\)[/tex] = sample size
- Given:
[tex]\[ \hat{p} = \frac{91}{110} = 0.8273 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ p_0 = 0.71 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ n = 110 \][/tex]
- Calculating the standard error:
[tex]\[ SE = \sqrt{\frac{0.71 \times (1 - 0.71)}{110}} \approx 0.0425 \][/tex]
- Calculating the z-score:
[tex]\[ z = \frac{0.8273 - 0.71}{0.0425} \approx 2.76 \][/tex]
c) Find the p-value. Round to 4 decimals.
- To find the p-value associated with the calculated z-score for a two-tailed test:
[tex]\[ p\text{-value} = 2 \times P(Z > 2.76) \][/tex]
- Using standard normal distribution tables or computational tools, we find:
[tex]\[ p\text{-value} \approx 0.0057 \][/tex]
d) Make a decision.
- The significance level ([tex]\(\alpha\)[/tex]) is 0.01. We compare the p-value to the significance level:
[tex]\[ 0.0057 < 0.01 \][/tex]
- Since the p-value is less than the significance level, we reject the null hypothesis.
e) Write the conclusion.
- Given that we rejected the null hypothesis, we conclude that:
[tex]\[ \text{There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the percentage of college students who work is different than 71\%.} \][/tex]
Summary:
a) [tex]\(H_0: p = 0.71\)[/tex], [tex]\(H_a: p \neq 0.71\)[/tex]
b) [tex]\(z = 2.76\)[/tex]
c) [tex]\(p\text{-value} = 0.0057\)[/tex]
d) Reject the null hypothesis
e) There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the percentage of college students who work is different than 71\%.
We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Your questions are important to us at Westonci.ca. Visit again for expert answers and reliable information.