Explore Westonci.ca, the top Q&A platform where your questions are answered by professionals and enthusiasts alike. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals.
Sagot :
Let's analyze the given problem step by step:
1. Given Sum:
[tex]\[ (4 + 5i) + (-3 + 7i) \][/tex]
2. Correct Calculation:
You add the real parts together and the imaginary parts together:
[tex]\[ (4 + (-3)) + (5i + 7i) = 1 + 12i \][/tex]
3. Aiko's Incorrect Rewriting:
Aiko rewrote the sum as:
[tex]\[ (-3+7) i + (4+5) i \][/tex]
This changes both the order and the grouping of the terms, and it implies an incorrect combination of real and imaginary parts.
4. Identifying the Error:
It's clear that Aiko mistakenly combined the real parts with the imaginary parts in an incorrect manner that does not follow the standard algebraic properties used for complex numbers.
To determine exactly which property was misapplied:
- Commutative Property: This states that you can change the order of the operands in addition or multiplication without changing the result. Aiko’s error wasn’t just changing the order but changing the method of addition itself.
- Associative Property: This allows you to group numbers differently in addition or multiplication. Aiko did not just regroup; she completely altered how the real and imaginary parts were combined.
- Identity Property: The identity property involves combining with 0 (for addition) or 1 (for multiplication). No such identity element is involved in her mistake.
- Distributive Property: This property involves distributing a single operation over others, like [tex]\(a(b + c) = ab + ac\)[/tex]. Aiko's attempt to combine the real number and the coefficient of the imaginary part suggests that she misapplied the distributive property by treating it as if the terms inside the parentheses could be grouped under the [tex]\(i\)[/tex] in the same way.
Based on the detailed analysis, the correct explanation for Aiko’s mistake is:
Aiko incorrectly used the distributive property by combining the real number and the coefficient of the imaginary part.
Therefore, the correct answer is:
Aiko incorrectly used the distributive property by combining the real number and the coefficient of the imaginary part.
1. Given Sum:
[tex]\[ (4 + 5i) + (-3 + 7i) \][/tex]
2. Correct Calculation:
You add the real parts together and the imaginary parts together:
[tex]\[ (4 + (-3)) + (5i + 7i) = 1 + 12i \][/tex]
3. Aiko's Incorrect Rewriting:
Aiko rewrote the sum as:
[tex]\[ (-3+7) i + (4+5) i \][/tex]
This changes both the order and the grouping of the terms, and it implies an incorrect combination of real and imaginary parts.
4. Identifying the Error:
It's clear that Aiko mistakenly combined the real parts with the imaginary parts in an incorrect manner that does not follow the standard algebraic properties used for complex numbers.
To determine exactly which property was misapplied:
- Commutative Property: This states that you can change the order of the operands in addition or multiplication without changing the result. Aiko’s error wasn’t just changing the order but changing the method of addition itself.
- Associative Property: This allows you to group numbers differently in addition or multiplication. Aiko did not just regroup; she completely altered how the real and imaginary parts were combined.
- Identity Property: The identity property involves combining with 0 (for addition) or 1 (for multiplication). No such identity element is involved in her mistake.
- Distributive Property: This property involves distributing a single operation over others, like [tex]\(a(b + c) = ab + ac\)[/tex]. Aiko's attempt to combine the real number and the coefficient of the imaginary part suggests that she misapplied the distributive property by treating it as if the terms inside the parentheses could be grouped under the [tex]\(i\)[/tex] in the same way.
Based on the detailed analysis, the correct explanation for Aiko’s mistake is:
Aiko incorrectly used the distributive property by combining the real number and the coefficient of the imaginary part.
Therefore, the correct answer is:
Aiko incorrectly used the distributive property by combining the real number and the coefficient of the imaginary part.
Thanks for using our platform. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Stay curious and keep coming back to Westonci.ca for answers to all your burning questions.