Looking for answers? Westonci.ca is your go-to Q&A platform, offering quick, trustworthy responses from a community of experts. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform.
Sagot :
To determine which transformations can move a point [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((5, 0)\)[/tex], we need to understand the nature of the transformations involved. Specifically, we will focus on rotations around the origin ([tex]\(0, 0\)[/tex]).
1. [tex]$\mathbf{R_{0,90^{\circ}}}$[/tex]:
- A 90-degree clockwise rotation about the origin transforms a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((y, -x)\)[/tex].
- Applying this to the point [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex], we get:
[tex]\[ (0, 5) \rightarrow (5, 0) \][/tex]
- Hence, a 90-degree clockwise rotation could indeed move [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((5, 0)\)[/tex].
2. [tex]$\mathbf{R_{0,180^{\circ}}}$[/tex]:
- A 180-degree rotation about the origin transforms a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((-x, -y)\)[/tex].
- Applying this to the point [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex], we get:
[tex]\[ (0, 5) \rightarrow (0, -5) \][/tex]
- Therefore, a 180-degree rotation does not move [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((5, 0)\)[/tex].
3. [tex]$\mathbf{R_{0,270^{\circ}}}$[/tex]:
- A 270-degree clockwise (or equivalently, 90-degree counterclockwise) rotation about the origin transforms a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((-y, x)\)[/tex].
- Applying this to the point [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex], we get:
[tex]\[ (0, 5) \rightarrow (5, 0) \][/tex]
- Hence, a 270-degree clockwise rotation could indeed move [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((5, 0)\)[/tex].
4. [tex]$\mathbf{R_{0,-90^{\circ}}}$[/tex]:
- A -90-degree (or 270-degree counterclockwise) rotation about the origin transforms a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((-y, x)\)[/tex].
- Applying this to the point [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex], we get:
[tex]\[ (0, 5) \rightarrow (5, 0) \][/tex]
- Hence, a -90-degree rotation could indeed move [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((5, 0)\)[/tex].
5. [tex]$\mathbf{R_{0,-180^{\circ}}}$[/tex]:
- A -180-degree (or 180-degree clockwise) rotation about the origin transforms a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((-x, -y)\)[/tex].
- Applying this to the point [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex], we get:
[tex]\[ (0, 5) \rightarrow (0, -5) \][/tex]
- Therefore, a -180-degree rotation does not move [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((5, 0)\)[/tex].
Considering these explanations, the transformations that can move the vertex from [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((5, 0)\)[/tex] are:
- [tex]$R_{0,90^{\circ}}$[/tex]
- [tex]$R_{0,270^{\circ}}$[/tex]
Thus, the correct options are:
[tex]\[ \boxed{R_{0,90^{\circ}} \text{ and } R_{0,270^{\circ}}} \][/tex]
1. [tex]$\mathbf{R_{0,90^{\circ}}}$[/tex]:
- A 90-degree clockwise rotation about the origin transforms a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((y, -x)\)[/tex].
- Applying this to the point [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex], we get:
[tex]\[ (0, 5) \rightarrow (5, 0) \][/tex]
- Hence, a 90-degree clockwise rotation could indeed move [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((5, 0)\)[/tex].
2. [tex]$\mathbf{R_{0,180^{\circ}}}$[/tex]:
- A 180-degree rotation about the origin transforms a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((-x, -y)\)[/tex].
- Applying this to the point [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex], we get:
[tex]\[ (0, 5) \rightarrow (0, -5) \][/tex]
- Therefore, a 180-degree rotation does not move [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((5, 0)\)[/tex].
3. [tex]$\mathbf{R_{0,270^{\circ}}}$[/tex]:
- A 270-degree clockwise (or equivalently, 90-degree counterclockwise) rotation about the origin transforms a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((-y, x)\)[/tex].
- Applying this to the point [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex], we get:
[tex]\[ (0, 5) \rightarrow (5, 0) \][/tex]
- Hence, a 270-degree clockwise rotation could indeed move [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((5, 0)\)[/tex].
4. [tex]$\mathbf{R_{0,-90^{\circ}}}$[/tex]:
- A -90-degree (or 270-degree counterclockwise) rotation about the origin transforms a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((-y, x)\)[/tex].
- Applying this to the point [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex], we get:
[tex]\[ (0, 5) \rightarrow (5, 0) \][/tex]
- Hence, a -90-degree rotation could indeed move [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((5, 0)\)[/tex].
5. [tex]$\mathbf{R_{0,-180^{\circ}}}$[/tex]:
- A -180-degree (or 180-degree clockwise) rotation about the origin transforms a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((-x, -y)\)[/tex].
- Applying this to the point [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex], we get:
[tex]\[ (0, 5) \rightarrow (0, -5) \][/tex]
- Therefore, a -180-degree rotation does not move [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((5, 0)\)[/tex].
Considering these explanations, the transformations that can move the vertex from [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((5, 0)\)[/tex] are:
- [tex]$R_{0,90^{\circ}}$[/tex]
- [tex]$R_{0,270^{\circ}}$[/tex]
Thus, the correct options are:
[tex]\[ \boxed{R_{0,90^{\circ}} \text{ and } R_{0,270^{\circ}}} \][/tex]
Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Discover more at Westonci.ca. Return for the latest expert answers and updates on various topics.
