Westonci.ca is your trusted source for finding answers to all your questions. Ask, explore, and learn with our expert community. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of seasoned experts on our user-friendly platform. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.
Sagot :
To determine which transformations can move a point [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((5, 0)\)[/tex], we need to understand the nature of the transformations involved. Specifically, we will focus on rotations around the origin ([tex]\(0, 0\)[/tex]).
1. [tex]$\mathbf{R_{0,90^{\circ}}}$[/tex]:
- A 90-degree clockwise rotation about the origin transforms a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((y, -x)\)[/tex].
- Applying this to the point [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex], we get:
[tex]\[ (0, 5) \rightarrow (5, 0) \][/tex]
- Hence, a 90-degree clockwise rotation could indeed move [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((5, 0)\)[/tex].
2. [tex]$\mathbf{R_{0,180^{\circ}}}$[/tex]:
- A 180-degree rotation about the origin transforms a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((-x, -y)\)[/tex].
- Applying this to the point [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex], we get:
[tex]\[ (0, 5) \rightarrow (0, -5) \][/tex]
- Therefore, a 180-degree rotation does not move [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((5, 0)\)[/tex].
3. [tex]$\mathbf{R_{0,270^{\circ}}}$[/tex]:
- A 270-degree clockwise (or equivalently, 90-degree counterclockwise) rotation about the origin transforms a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((-y, x)\)[/tex].
- Applying this to the point [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex], we get:
[tex]\[ (0, 5) \rightarrow (5, 0) \][/tex]
- Hence, a 270-degree clockwise rotation could indeed move [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((5, 0)\)[/tex].
4. [tex]$\mathbf{R_{0,-90^{\circ}}}$[/tex]:
- A -90-degree (or 270-degree counterclockwise) rotation about the origin transforms a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((-y, x)\)[/tex].
- Applying this to the point [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex], we get:
[tex]\[ (0, 5) \rightarrow (5, 0) \][/tex]
- Hence, a -90-degree rotation could indeed move [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((5, 0)\)[/tex].
5. [tex]$\mathbf{R_{0,-180^{\circ}}}$[/tex]:
- A -180-degree (or 180-degree clockwise) rotation about the origin transforms a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((-x, -y)\)[/tex].
- Applying this to the point [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex], we get:
[tex]\[ (0, 5) \rightarrow (0, -5) \][/tex]
- Therefore, a -180-degree rotation does not move [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((5, 0)\)[/tex].
Considering these explanations, the transformations that can move the vertex from [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((5, 0)\)[/tex] are:
- [tex]$R_{0,90^{\circ}}$[/tex]
- [tex]$R_{0,270^{\circ}}$[/tex]
Thus, the correct options are:
[tex]\[ \boxed{R_{0,90^{\circ}} \text{ and } R_{0,270^{\circ}}} \][/tex]
1. [tex]$\mathbf{R_{0,90^{\circ}}}$[/tex]:
- A 90-degree clockwise rotation about the origin transforms a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((y, -x)\)[/tex].
- Applying this to the point [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex], we get:
[tex]\[ (0, 5) \rightarrow (5, 0) \][/tex]
- Hence, a 90-degree clockwise rotation could indeed move [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((5, 0)\)[/tex].
2. [tex]$\mathbf{R_{0,180^{\circ}}}$[/tex]:
- A 180-degree rotation about the origin transforms a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((-x, -y)\)[/tex].
- Applying this to the point [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex], we get:
[tex]\[ (0, 5) \rightarrow (0, -5) \][/tex]
- Therefore, a 180-degree rotation does not move [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((5, 0)\)[/tex].
3. [tex]$\mathbf{R_{0,270^{\circ}}}$[/tex]:
- A 270-degree clockwise (or equivalently, 90-degree counterclockwise) rotation about the origin transforms a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((-y, x)\)[/tex].
- Applying this to the point [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex], we get:
[tex]\[ (0, 5) \rightarrow (5, 0) \][/tex]
- Hence, a 270-degree clockwise rotation could indeed move [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((5, 0)\)[/tex].
4. [tex]$\mathbf{R_{0,-90^{\circ}}}$[/tex]:
- A -90-degree (or 270-degree counterclockwise) rotation about the origin transforms a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((-y, x)\)[/tex].
- Applying this to the point [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex], we get:
[tex]\[ (0, 5) \rightarrow (5, 0) \][/tex]
- Hence, a -90-degree rotation could indeed move [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((5, 0)\)[/tex].
5. [tex]$\mathbf{R_{0,-180^{\circ}}}$[/tex]:
- A -180-degree (or 180-degree clockwise) rotation about the origin transforms a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((-x, -y)\)[/tex].
- Applying this to the point [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex], we get:
[tex]\[ (0, 5) \rightarrow (0, -5) \][/tex]
- Therefore, a -180-degree rotation does not move [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((5, 0)\)[/tex].
Considering these explanations, the transformations that can move the vertex from [tex]\((0, 5)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((5, 0)\)[/tex] are:
- [tex]$R_{0,90^{\circ}}$[/tex]
- [tex]$R_{0,270^{\circ}}$[/tex]
Thus, the correct options are:
[tex]\[ \boxed{R_{0,90^{\circ}} \text{ and } R_{0,270^{\circ}}} \][/tex]
Thanks for using our service. We aim to provide the most accurate answers for all your queries. Visit us again for more insights. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Thank you for trusting Westonci.ca. Don't forget to revisit us for more accurate and insightful answers.
