Find the information you're looking for at Westonci.ca, the trusted Q&A platform with a community of knowledgeable experts. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.
Sagot :
To determine which exponential model best represents the given data, we consider four different exponential models:
1. [tex]\( f(x) = 5(1.2)^x \)[/tex]
2. [tex]\( f(x) = 5(0.2)^x \)[/tex]
3. [tex]\( f(x) = 2(5)^x \)[/tex]
4. [tex]\( f(x) = 2(0.5)^x \)[/tex]
The table of data points is:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline x & f(x) \\ \hline -2 & 128 \\ \hline -1 & 27 \\ \hline 0 & 5 \\ \hline 1 & 1 \\ \hline 2 & 0.1 \\ \hline \end{array} \][/tex]
We need to evaluate the sum of the squared deviations between the observed data points and the values predicted by each model. This can be done by calculating the deviation for each data point, squaring it, and then summing these values for all data points.
### Calculating the Sum of Squared Deviations for Each Model
#### Model 1: [tex]\( f(x) = 5(1.2)^x \)[/tex]
For each [tex]\( x \)[/tex]:
- [tex]\( f(-2) = 5(1.2)^{-2} \approx 3.47 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(-1) = 5(1.2)^{-1} \approx 4.17 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(0) = 5(1.2)^0 = 5 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(1) = 5(1.2)^1 = 6 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(2) = 5(1.2)^2 = 7.2 \)[/tex]
Sum of Squared Deviations:
[tex]\[ (128 - 3.47)^2 + (27 - 4.17)^2 + (5 - 5)^2 + (1 - 6)^2 + (0.1 - 7.2)^2 \][/tex]
#### Model 2: [tex]\( f(x) = 5(0.2)^x \)[/tex]
For each [tex]\( x \)[/tex]:
- [tex]\( f(-2) = 5(0.2)^{-2} = 125 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(-1) = 5(0.2)^{-1} = 25 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(0) = 5(0.2)^0 = 5 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(1) = 5(0.2)^1 = 1 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(2) = 5(0.2)^2 = 0.2 \)[/tex]
Sum of Squared Deviations:
[tex]\[ (128 - 125)^2 + (27 - 25)^2 + (5 - 5)^2 + (1 - 1)^2 + (0.1 - 0.2)^2 \][/tex]
#### Model 3: [tex]\( f(x) = 2(5)^x \)[/tex]
For each [tex]\( x \)[/tex]:
- [tex]\( f(-2) = 2(5)^{-2} = 0.08 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(-1) = 2(5)^{-1} = 0.4 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(0) = 2(5)^0 = 2 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(1) = 2(5)^1 = 10 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(2) = 2(5)^2 = 50 \)[/tex]
Sum of Squared Deviations:
[tex]\[ (128 - 0.08)^2 + (27 - 0.4)^2 + (5 - 2)^2 + (1 - 10)^2 + (0.1 - 50)^2 \][/tex]
#### Model 4: [tex]\( f(x) = 2(0.5)^x \)[/tex]
For each [tex]\( x \)[/tex]:
- [tex]\( f(-2) = 2(0.5)^{-2} = 8 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(-1) = 2(0.5)^{-1} = 4 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(0) = 2(0.5)^0 = 2 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(1) = 2(0.5)^1 = 1 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(2) = 2(0.5)^2 = 0.5 \)[/tex]
Sum of Squared Deviations:
[tex]\[ (128 - 8)^2 + (27 - 4)^2 + (5 - 2)^2 + (1 - 1)^2 + (0.1 - 0.5)^2 \][/tex]
### Identifying the Best Model
By evaluating each model using the sum of squared deviations, we find the model that fits the data most closely. This model will have the smallest total sum of squared deviations.
The results from our computations indicate that the sum of squared deviations for the second model [tex]\( f(x) = 5(0.2)^x \)[/tex] is the smallest.
Thus, the best model to represent the data is:
[tex]\[ f(x) = 5(0.2)^x \][/tex]
With a sum of squared deviations of approximately 13.01.
1. [tex]\( f(x) = 5(1.2)^x \)[/tex]
2. [tex]\( f(x) = 5(0.2)^x \)[/tex]
3. [tex]\( f(x) = 2(5)^x \)[/tex]
4. [tex]\( f(x) = 2(0.5)^x \)[/tex]
The table of data points is:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline x & f(x) \\ \hline -2 & 128 \\ \hline -1 & 27 \\ \hline 0 & 5 \\ \hline 1 & 1 \\ \hline 2 & 0.1 \\ \hline \end{array} \][/tex]
We need to evaluate the sum of the squared deviations between the observed data points and the values predicted by each model. This can be done by calculating the deviation for each data point, squaring it, and then summing these values for all data points.
### Calculating the Sum of Squared Deviations for Each Model
#### Model 1: [tex]\( f(x) = 5(1.2)^x \)[/tex]
For each [tex]\( x \)[/tex]:
- [tex]\( f(-2) = 5(1.2)^{-2} \approx 3.47 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(-1) = 5(1.2)^{-1} \approx 4.17 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(0) = 5(1.2)^0 = 5 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(1) = 5(1.2)^1 = 6 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(2) = 5(1.2)^2 = 7.2 \)[/tex]
Sum of Squared Deviations:
[tex]\[ (128 - 3.47)^2 + (27 - 4.17)^2 + (5 - 5)^2 + (1 - 6)^2 + (0.1 - 7.2)^2 \][/tex]
#### Model 2: [tex]\( f(x) = 5(0.2)^x \)[/tex]
For each [tex]\( x \)[/tex]:
- [tex]\( f(-2) = 5(0.2)^{-2} = 125 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(-1) = 5(0.2)^{-1} = 25 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(0) = 5(0.2)^0 = 5 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(1) = 5(0.2)^1 = 1 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(2) = 5(0.2)^2 = 0.2 \)[/tex]
Sum of Squared Deviations:
[tex]\[ (128 - 125)^2 + (27 - 25)^2 + (5 - 5)^2 + (1 - 1)^2 + (0.1 - 0.2)^2 \][/tex]
#### Model 3: [tex]\( f(x) = 2(5)^x \)[/tex]
For each [tex]\( x \)[/tex]:
- [tex]\( f(-2) = 2(5)^{-2} = 0.08 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(-1) = 2(5)^{-1} = 0.4 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(0) = 2(5)^0 = 2 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(1) = 2(5)^1 = 10 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(2) = 2(5)^2 = 50 \)[/tex]
Sum of Squared Deviations:
[tex]\[ (128 - 0.08)^2 + (27 - 0.4)^2 + (5 - 2)^2 + (1 - 10)^2 + (0.1 - 50)^2 \][/tex]
#### Model 4: [tex]\( f(x) = 2(0.5)^x \)[/tex]
For each [tex]\( x \)[/tex]:
- [tex]\( f(-2) = 2(0.5)^{-2} = 8 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(-1) = 2(0.5)^{-1} = 4 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(0) = 2(0.5)^0 = 2 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(1) = 2(0.5)^1 = 1 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(2) = 2(0.5)^2 = 0.5 \)[/tex]
Sum of Squared Deviations:
[tex]\[ (128 - 8)^2 + (27 - 4)^2 + (5 - 2)^2 + (1 - 1)^2 + (0.1 - 0.5)^2 \][/tex]
### Identifying the Best Model
By evaluating each model using the sum of squared deviations, we find the model that fits the data most closely. This model will have the smallest total sum of squared deviations.
The results from our computations indicate that the sum of squared deviations for the second model [tex]\( f(x) = 5(0.2)^x \)[/tex] is the smallest.
Thus, the best model to represent the data is:
[tex]\[ f(x) = 5(0.2)^x \][/tex]
With a sum of squared deviations of approximately 13.01.
We hope this information was helpful. Feel free to return anytime for more answers to your questions and concerns. We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. We're glad you chose Westonci.ca. Revisit us for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.
