At Westonci.ca, we connect you with the best answers from a community of experienced and knowledgeable individuals. Join our Q&A platform and get accurate answers to all your questions from professionals across multiple disciplines. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.
Sagot :
Let's relate each transformation of the function [tex]\( f \)[/tex] to a feature of the transformed function.
1. [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept at [tex]\( (0, 2) \)[/tex]
- The function [tex]\( h(x) = f(x) + 2 \)[/tex] is a vertical shift of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] upwards by 2 units. For any input [tex]\( x \)[/tex], [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] will be increased by 2. Consequently, the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept of the original function [tex]\( f(0) \)[/tex] is now [tex]\( f(0) + 2 \)[/tex]. Hence, if the new [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept is at [tex]\( (0, 2) \)[/tex], it perfectly matches with [tex]\( h(x) = f(x) + 2 \)[/tex].
2. Asymptote of [tex]\( y = 2 \)[/tex]
- The function [tex]\( h(x) = f(x) + 2 \)[/tex] also impacts horizontal asymptotes. If the original function [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] has a horizontal asymptote at [tex]\( y = 0 \)[/tex], then adding 2 to [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] shifts the asymptote to [tex]\( y = 2 \)[/tex]. Therefore, the asymptote of [tex]\( y = 2 \)[/tex] corresponds to [tex]\( h(x) = f(x) + 2 \)[/tex].
3. [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept at [tex]\( (0, 4) \)[/tex]
- The function [tex]\( g(x) = 2f(x) \)[/tex] illustrates a vertical stretch of the function [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] by a factor of 2. Therefore, if the original function [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] had a [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept at [tex]\( f(0) \)[/tex], the new [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept would be [tex]\( 2 \cdot f(0) \)[/tex]. Thus, if the new [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept is at [tex]\( (0, 4) \)[/tex], then [tex]\( f(0) \)[/tex] must have been [tex]\( 4/2 = 2 \)[/tex]. So, [tex]\( g(x) = 2f(x) \)[/tex] corresponds to a [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept at [tex]\( (0, 4) \)[/tex].
4. Function decreases as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] increases
- The function [tex]\( m(x) = -f(x) \)[/tex] represents a reflection across the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-axis. If [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] was increasing, [tex]\( -f(x) \)[/tex] will be decreasing because flipping the function vertically inverts its growth properties. Thus, [tex]\( m(x) = -f(x) \)[/tex] corresponds to a function that decreases as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] increases.
Summarizing the transformations and their corresponding features:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{l} h(x)=f(x)+2 \rightarrow y\text{-intercept at }(0, 2) \\ h(x)=f(x)+2 \rightarrow \text{asymptote of } y=2 \\ g(x)=2 f(x) \rightarrow y\text{-intercept at } (0, 4) \\ m(x)=-f(x) \rightarrow \text{function decreases as } x \text{ increases} \end{array} \][/tex]
1. [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept at [tex]\( (0, 2) \)[/tex]
- The function [tex]\( h(x) = f(x) + 2 \)[/tex] is a vertical shift of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] upwards by 2 units. For any input [tex]\( x \)[/tex], [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] will be increased by 2. Consequently, the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept of the original function [tex]\( f(0) \)[/tex] is now [tex]\( f(0) + 2 \)[/tex]. Hence, if the new [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept is at [tex]\( (0, 2) \)[/tex], it perfectly matches with [tex]\( h(x) = f(x) + 2 \)[/tex].
2. Asymptote of [tex]\( y = 2 \)[/tex]
- The function [tex]\( h(x) = f(x) + 2 \)[/tex] also impacts horizontal asymptotes. If the original function [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] has a horizontal asymptote at [tex]\( y = 0 \)[/tex], then adding 2 to [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] shifts the asymptote to [tex]\( y = 2 \)[/tex]. Therefore, the asymptote of [tex]\( y = 2 \)[/tex] corresponds to [tex]\( h(x) = f(x) + 2 \)[/tex].
3. [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept at [tex]\( (0, 4) \)[/tex]
- The function [tex]\( g(x) = 2f(x) \)[/tex] illustrates a vertical stretch of the function [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] by a factor of 2. Therefore, if the original function [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] had a [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept at [tex]\( f(0) \)[/tex], the new [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept would be [tex]\( 2 \cdot f(0) \)[/tex]. Thus, if the new [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept is at [tex]\( (0, 4) \)[/tex], then [tex]\( f(0) \)[/tex] must have been [tex]\( 4/2 = 2 \)[/tex]. So, [tex]\( g(x) = 2f(x) \)[/tex] corresponds to a [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept at [tex]\( (0, 4) \)[/tex].
4. Function decreases as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] increases
- The function [tex]\( m(x) = -f(x) \)[/tex] represents a reflection across the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-axis. If [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] was increasing, [tex]\( -f(x) \)[/tex] will be decreasing because flipping the function vertically inverts its growth properties. Thus, [tex]\( m(x) = -f(x) \)[/tex] corresponds to a function that decreases as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] increases.
Summarizing the transformations and their corresponding features:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{l} h(x)=f(x)+2 \rightarrow y\text{-intercept at }(0, 2) \\ h(x)=f(x)+2 \rightarrow \text{asymptote of } y=2 \\ g(x)=2 f(x) \rightarrow y\text{-intercept at } (0, 4) \\ m(x)=-f(x) \rightarrow \text{function decreases as } x \text{ increases} \end{array} \][/tex]
Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Discover more at Westonci.ca. Return for the latest expert answers and updates on various topics.
