Welcome to Westonci.ca, where finding answers to your questions is made simple by our community of experts. Ask your questions and receive detailed answers from professionals with extensive experience in various fields. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.
Sagot :
Let's relate each transformation of the function [tex]\( f \)[/tex] to a feature of the transformed function.
1. [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept at [tex]\( (0, 2) \)[/tex]
- The function [tex]\( h(x) = f(x) + 2 \)[/tex] is a vertical shift of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] upwards by 2 units. For any input [tex]\( x \)[/tex], [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] will be increased by 2. Consequently, the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept of the original function [tex]\( f(0) \)[/tex] is now [tex]\( f(0) + 2 \)[/tex]. Hence, if the new [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept is at [tex]\( (0, 2) \)[/tex], it perfectly matches with [tex]\( h(x) = f(x) + 2 \)[/tex].
2. Asymptote of [tex]\( y = 2 \)[/tex]
- The function [tex]\( h(x) = f(x) + 2 \)[/tex] also impacts horizontal asymptotes. If the original function [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] has a horizontal asymptote at [tex]\( y = 0 \)[/tex], then adding 2 to [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] shifts the asymptote to [tex]\( y = 2 \)[/tex]. Therefore, the asymptote of [tex]\( y = 2 \)[/tex] corresponds to [tex]\( h(x) = f(x) + 2 \)[/tex].
3. [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept at [tex]\( (0, 4) \)[/tex]
- The function [tex]\( g(x) = 2f(x) \)[/tex] illustrates a vertical stretch of the function [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] by a factor of 2. Therefore, if the original function [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] had a [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept at [tex]\( f(0) \)[/tex], the new [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept would be [tex]\( 2 \cdot f(0) \)[/tex]. Thus, if the new [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept is at [tex]\( (0, 4) \)[/tex], then [tex]\( f(0) \)[/tex] must have been [tex]\( 4/2 = 2 \)[/tex]. So, [tex]\( g(x) = 2f(x) \)[/tex] corresponds to a [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept at [tex]\( (0, 4) \)[/tex].
4. Function decreases as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] increases
- The function [tex]\( m(x) = -f(x) \)[/tex] represents a reflection across the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-axis. If [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] was increasing, [tex]\( -f(x) \)[/tex] will be decreasing because flipping the function vertically inverts its growth properties. Thus, [tex]\( m(x) = -f(x) \)[/tex] corresponds to a function that decreases as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] increases.
Summarizing the transformations and their corresponding features:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{l} h(x)=f(x)+2 \rightarrow y\text{-intercept at }(0, 2) \\ h(x)=f(x)+2 \rightarrow \text{asymptote of } y=2 \\ g(x)=2 f(x) \rightarrow y\text{-intercept at } (0, 4) \\ m(x)=-f(x) \rightarrow \text{function decreases as } x \text{ increases} \end{array} \][/tex]
1. [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept at [tex]\( (0, 2) \)[/tex]
- The function [tex]\( h(x) = f(x) + 2 \)[/tex] is a vertical shift of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] upwards by 2 units. For any input [tex]\( x \)[/tex], [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] will be increased by 2. Consequently, the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept of the original function [tex]\( f(0) \)[/tex] is now [tex]\( f(0) + 2 \)[/tex]. Hence, if the new [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept is at [tex]\( (0, 2) \)[/tex], it perfectly matches with [tex]\( h(x) = f(x) + 2 \)[/tex].
2. Asymptote of [tex]\( y = 2 \)[/tex]
- The function [tex]\( h(x) = f(x) + 2 \)[/tex] also impacts horizontal asymptotes. If the original function [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] has a horizontal asymptote at [tex]\( y = 0 \)[/tex], then adding 2 to [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] shifts the asymptote to [tex]\( y = 2 \)[/tex]. Therefore, the asymptote of [tex]\( y = 2 \)[/tex] corresponds to [tex]\( h(x) = f(x) + 2 \)[/tex].
3. [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept at [tex]\( (0, 4) \)[/tex]
- The function [tex]\( g(x) = 2f(x) \)[/tex] illustrates a vertical stretch of the function [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] by a factor of 2. Therefore, if the original function [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] had a [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept at [tex]\( f(0) \)[/tex], the new [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept would be [tex]\( 2 \cdot f(0) \)[/tex]. Thus, if the new [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept is at [tex]\( (0, 4) \)[/tex], then [tex]\( f(0) \)[/tex] must have been [tex]\( 4/2 = 2 \)[/tex]. So, [tex]\( g(x) = 2f(x) \)[/tex] corresponds to a [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept at [tex]\( (0, 4) \)[/tex].
4. Function decreases as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] increases
- The function [tex]\( m(x) = -f(x) \)[/tex] represents a reflection across the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-axis. If [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] was increasing, [tex]\( -f(x) \)[/tex] will be decreasing because flipping the function vertically inverts its growth properties. Thus, [tex]\( m(x) = -f(x) \)[/tex] corresponds to a function that decreases as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] increases.
Summarizing the transformations and their corresponding features:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{l} h(x)=f(x)+2 \rightarrow y\text{-intercept at }(0, 2) \\ h(x)=f(x)+2 \rightarrow \text{asymptote of } y=2 \\ g(x)=2 f(x) \rightarrow y\text{-intercept at } (0, 4) \\ m(x)=-f(x) \rightarrow \text{function decreases as } x \text{ increases} \end{array} \][/tex]
Thank you for visiting our platform. We hope you found the answers you were looking for. Come back anytime you need more information. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Your questions are important to us at Westonci.ca. Visit again for expert answers and reliable information.
