Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, the ultimate question and answer platform. Get expert answers to your questions quickly and accurately. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing precise answers to your questions in different areas. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.

Choose one of Schlosser's two claims:

1. "The fast-food industry resembles the manufacturing business."
2. "Teenagers are the ideal employees for the fast-food industry."

Explain how Schlosser develops that claim by using specific types of evidence. Then critique his claim and discuss which evidence is most effective.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

Schlosser discusses teenagers as ideal employees for the fast-food industry and critiques the claim based on the evidence provided.


Explanation:

Schlosser's claim: Schlosser asserts that teenagers are the ideal employees for the fast-food industry. He supports this claim by providing evidence such as how the industry targets young workers due to their flexibility, lower wage expectations, and willingness to work in demanding conditions.

Critique and effective evidence: While Schlosser's evidence highlights the industry's exploitation of young workers, it also showcases the challenges faced by teenagers in such jobs. The most effective evidence is the insight into how fast-food jobs can provide valuable skills but often at the cost of exploitation.


Learn more about fast-food industry, teenagers, employment here:

https://brainly.com/question/32020212


Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Your questions are important to us at Westonci.ca. Visit again for expert answers and reliable information.