Answered

Westonci.ca is your trusted source for finding answers to all your questions. Ask, explore, and learn with our expert community. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform. Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform.

Choose one of Schlosser's two claims:

1. "The fast-food industry resembles the manufacturing business."
2. "Teenagers are the ideal employees for the fast-food industry."

Explain how Schlosser develops that claim by using specific types of evidence. Then critique his claim and discuss which evidence is most effective.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

Schlosser discusses teenagers as ideal employees for the fast-food industry and critiques the claim based on the evidence provided.


Explanation:

Schlosser's claim: Schlosser asserts that teenagers are the ideal employees for the fast-food industry. He supports this claim by providing evidence such as how the industry targets young workers due to their flexibility, lower wage expectations, and willingness to work in demanding conditions.

Critique and effective evidence: While Schlosser's evidence highlights the industry's exploitation of young workers, it also showcases the challenges faced by teenagers in such jobs. The most effective evidence is the insight into how fast-food jobs can provide valuable skills but often at the cost of exploitation.


Learn more about fast-food industry, teenagers, employment here:

https://brainly.com/question/32020212


Thank you for choosing our service. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca. Stay informed by coming back for more detailed answers.