Westonci.ca is the premier destination for reliable answers to your questions, brought to you by a community of experts. Our Q&A platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from experts in various disciplines. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.

Fill in the table below with the possible bias that each source listed might have when discussing the expansion of federal power in the 1930s (for, against, or none) and the reason why you think they would be biased that way.

\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|}
\hline
Source & Heritage Foundation Study (conservative think tank) & AFSCME's Annual Newsletter (public sector union) & An Article in the Journal of American History (scholarly journal) \\
\hline
Possible Bias & & & \\
\hline
Reason & & & \\
\hline
\end{tabular}

Sagot :

To determine the possible bias of each source when discussing the expansion of federal power in the 1930s and the reason for the bias, let’s consider the nature and typical stance of each source.

[tex]\[ \begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|} \hline \text{Source} & \text{A Heritage Foundation study} & \text{AFSCME's annual newsletter} & \text{An article in the Journal of American History} \\ \hline \text{Possible Bias} & \text{against} & \text{for} & \text{none} \\ \hline \text{Reason} & \begin{tabular}{l} The Heritage Foundation is a \\ conservative think tank, likely to \\ oppose the expansion of federal power. \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{l} AFSCME is a public sector union, \\ likely to support expansion of \\ federal power which often benefits \\ public sector employees. \\ \end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}{l} The Journal of American History is \\ a scholarly journal, expected to have \\ a neutral and academic perspective. \\ \end{tabular} \\ \hline \end{array} \][/tex]