Westonci.ca is your trusted source for accurate answers to all your questions. Join our community and start learning today! Explore thousands of questions and answers from knowledgeable experts in various fields on our Q&A platform. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.
Sagot :
Let's address the statements and conclusion presented by Geraldine regarding the exponential function [tex]\( f(x) = 2^x \)[/tex].
### Evaluating Statement 1:
1. Statement 1: As [tex]\( x \)[/tex] increases infinitely, the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-values are continually doubled for each single increase in [tex]\( x \)[/tex].
- An exponential function of the form [tex]\( f(x) = a^x \)[/tex], where [tex]\( a \)[/tex] is a constant greater than 1, satisfies this property. Specifically, for [tex]\( f(x) = 2^x \)[/tex], if [tex]\( x \)[/tex] increases by 1, the value of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] doubles.
- For example, if [tex]\( 2^x \)[/tex] at [tex]\( x=m \)[/tex] results in [tex]\( 2^m \)[/tex], then at [tex]\( x=m+1 \)[/tex], the result is [tex]\( 2^{m+1} = 2 \cdot 2^m \)[/tex], which clearly shows that the value is doubled.
Therefore, Statement 1 is correct.
### Evaluating Statement 2:
2. Statement 2: As [tex]\( x \)[/tex] decreases infinitely, the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-values are continually halved for each single decrease in [tex]\( x \)[/tex].
- Following similar reasoning, if [tex]\( x \)[/tex] decreases by 1, the value of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] is halved.
- For instance, if [tex]\( 2^x \)[/tex] at [tex]\( x=n \)[/tex] results in [tex]\( 2^n \)[/tex], then at [tex]\( x=n-1 \)[/tex], the result is [tex]\( 2^{n-1} = \frac{1}{2} \cdot 2^n \)[/tex], which clearly shows that the value is halved.
Therefore, Statement 2 is correct.
### Evaluating the Conclusion:
- Geraldine's conclusion is that there are no limits within the set of real numbers on the range of this exponential function.
To analyze this:
- The range of [tex]\( f(x) = 2^x \)[/tex] is all positive real numbers [tex]\( (0, \infty) \)[/tex].
- This means that [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] can take any positive real value, no matter how large. However, it can never take on non-positive values (zero or negative numbers).
Therefore, the conclusion that there are 'no limits' is incorrect because there is a limit: [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] is confined to positive real numbers.
Thus, the best explanation is:
> The conclusion is incorrect because the range is limited to the set of positive real numbers.
### Evaluating Statement 1:
1. Statement 1: As [tex]\( x \)[/tex] increases infinitely, the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-values are continually doubled for each single increase in [tex]\( x \)[/tex].
- An exponential function of the form [tex]\( f(x) = a^x \)[/tex], where [tex]\( a \)[/tex] is a constant greater than 1, satisfies this property. Specifically, for [tex]\( f(x) = 2^x \)[/tex], if [tex]\( x \)[/tex] increases by 1, the value of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] doubles.
- For example, if [tex]\( 2^x \)[/tex] at [tex]\( x=m \)[/tex] results in [tex]\( 2^m \)[/tex], then at [tex]\( x=m+1 \)[/tex], the result is [tex]\( 2^{m+1} = 2 \cdot 2^m \)[/tex], which clearly shows that the value is doubled.
Therefore, Statement 1 is correct.
### Evaluating Statement 2:
2. Statement 2: As [tex]\( x \)[/tex] decreases infinitely, the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-values are continually halved for each single decrease in [tex]\( x \)[/tex].
- Following similar reasoning, if [tex]\( x \)[/tex] decreases by 1, the value of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] is halved.
- For instance, if [tex]\( 2^x \)[/tex] at [tex]\( x=n \)[/tex] results in [tex]\( 2^n \)[/tex], then at [tex]\( x=n-1 \)[/tex], the result is [tex]\( 2^{n-1} = \frac{1}{2} \cdot 2^n \)[/tex], which clearly shows that the value is halved.
Therefore, Statement 2 is correct.
### Evaluating the Conclusion:
- Geraldine's conclusion is that there are no limits within the set of real numbers on the range of this exponential function.
To analyze this:
- The range of [tex]\( f(x) = 2^x \)[/tex] is all positive real numbers [tex]\( (0, \infty) \)[/tex].
- This means that [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] can take any positive real value, no matter how large. However, it can never take on non-positive values (zero or negative numbers).
Therefore, the conclusion that there are 'no limits' is incorrect because there is a limit: [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] is confined to positive real numbers.
Thus, the best explanation is:
> The conclusion is incorrect because the range is limited to the set of positive real numbers.
Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Westonci.ca is your trusted source for answers. Visit us again to find more information on diverse topics.