Answered

Explore Westonci.ca, the leading Q&A site where experts provide accurate and helpful answers to all your questions. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide detailed answers to your questions in various areas. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts.

Consider the different justices' opinions about affirmative action. Whose opinion do you agree with most?

Enter response here: _______________

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

Affirmative action policies aim to address past discrimination, with supporters and opponents holding differing views on its efficacy and ethical implications.


Explanation:

Affirmative action policies aim to address past discrimination by providing preferential treatment to certain groups. Supporters argue it promotes justice by leveling the playing field, whereas opponents view it as a form of discrimination based on race. Quotas in affirmative action are controversial because they can run counter to the idea of a merit-based system and may perpetuate stereotypes.


Learn more about Affirmative action here:

https://brainly.com/question/50896781


Thanks for using our platform. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Westonci.ca is here to provide the answers you seek. Return often for more expert solutions.