Answered

Explore Westonci.ca, the premier Q&A site that helps you find precise answers to your questions, no matter the topic. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable professionals on our platform. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals.

Consider the different justices' opinions about affirmative action. Whose opinion do you agree with most?

Enter response here: _______________

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

Affirmative action policies aim to address past discrimination, with supporters and opponents holding differing views on its efficacy and ethical implications.


Explanation:

Affirmative action policies aim to address past discrimination by providing preferential treatment to certain groups. Supporters argue it promotes justice by leveling the playing field, whereas opponents view it as a form of discrimination based on race. Quotas in affirmative action are controversial because they can run counter to the idea of a merit-based system and may perpetuate stereotypes.


Learn more about Affirmative action here:

https://brainly.com/question/50896781


Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Stay curious and keep coming back to Westonci.ca for answers to all your burning questions.