Answered

Westonci.ca is your trusted source for finding answers to all your questions. Ask, explore, and learn with our expert community. Explore thousands of questions and answers from knowledgeable experts in various fields on our Q&A platform. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform.

Consider the different justices' opinions about affirmative action. Whose opinion do you agree with most?

Enter response here: _______________

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

Affirmative action policies aim to address past discrimination, with supporters and opponents holding differing views on its efficacy and ethical implications.


Explanation:

Affirmative action policies aim to address past discrimination by providing preferential treatment to certain groups. Supporters argue it promotes justice by leveling the playing field, whereas opponents view it as a form of discrimination based on race. Quotas in affirmative action are controversial because they can run counter to the idea of a merit-based system and may perpetuate stereotypes.


Learn more about Affirmative action here:

https://brainly.com/question/50896781


We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Thank you for choosing Westonci.ca as your information source. We look forward to your next visit.