Answered

Discover answers to your questions with Westonci.ca, the leading Q&A platform that connects you with knowledgeable experts. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable professionals on our platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.

Consider the different justices' opinions about affirmative action. Whose opinion do you agree with most?

Enter response here: _______________

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

Affirmative action policies aim to address past discrimination, with supporters and opponents holding differing views on its efficacy and ethical implications.


Explanation:

Affirmative action policies aim to address past discrimination by providing preferential treatment to certain groups. Supporters argue it promotes justice by leveling the playing field, whereas opponents view it as a form of discrimination based on race. Quotas in affirmative action are controversial because they can run counter to the idea of a merit-based system and may perpetuate stereotypes.


Learn more about Affirmative action here:

https://brainly.com/question/50896781


We hope our answers were helpful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you may have. Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. Discover more at Westonci.ca. Return for the latest expert answers and updates on various topics.