Discover answers to your most pressing questions at Westonci.ca, the ultimate Q&A platform that connects you with expert solutions. Explore in-depth answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts across different fields. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals.
Sagot :
Sure, let's analyze each compound inequality step by step to determine which one has no solution.
### Compound Inequality 1:
[tex]\( m + 7 < 8 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( -5m \geq 10 \)[/tex]
1. Solve [tex]\( m + 7 < 8 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ m + 7 < 8 \implies m < 1 \][/tex]
2. Solve [tex]\( -5m \geq 10 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ -5m \geq 10 \implies m \leq -2 \][/tex]
Combining these solutions, we need [tex]\( m < 1 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( m \leq -2 \)[/tex]. These conditions are incompatible since there is no number that is both less than 1 and less than or equal to -2. Therefore, this compound inequality has no solution.
### Compound Inequality 2:
[tex]\( 3m \leq -21 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( m + 24 > 19 \)[/tex]
1. Solve [tex]\( 3m \leq -21 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ 3m \leq -21 \implies m \leq -7 \][/tex]
2. Solve [tex]\( m + 24 > 19 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ m + 24 > 19 \implies m > -5 \][/tex]
Combining these solutions, we need [tex]\( m \leq -7 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( m > -5 \)[/tex]. These conditions are incompatible since there is no number that is both less than or equal to -7 and greater than -5. Therefore, this compound inequality has no solution.
### Compound Inequality 3:
[tex]\( -3m < 6 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( 4m > 24 \)[/tex]
1. Solve [tex]\( -3m < 6 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ -3m < 6 \implies m > -2 \][/tex]
2. Solve [tex]\( 4m > 24 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ 4m > 24 \implies m > 6 \][/tex]
Combining these solutions, we need [tex]\( m > -2 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( m > 6 \)[/tex]. Since [tex]\( m > 6 \)[/tex] implies that [tex]\( m > -2 \)[/tex] is already satisfied, the combined solution is [tex]\( m > 6 \)[/tex]. Therefore, this compound inequality does have a solution.
### Compound Inequality 4:
[tex]\( 3m + 7 \geq 7 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( -4m + 8 \leq -12 \)[/tex]
1. Solve [tex]\( 3m + 7 \geq 7 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ 3m + 7 \geq 7 \implies 3m \geq 0 \implies m \geq 0 \][/tex]
2. Solve [tex]\( -4m + 8 \leq -12 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ -4m + 8 \leq -12 \implies -4m \leq -20 \implies m \geq 5 \][/tex]
Combining these solutions, we need [tex]\( m \geq 0 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( m \geq 5 \)[/tex]. The combined solution is [tex]\( m \geq 5 \)[/tex]. Therefore, this compound inequality does have a solution.
### Conclusion:
Both the first and second compound inequalities have no solution. Analyzing both, they both have incompatible conditions. Thus:
1. [tex]\( m + 7 < 8 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( -5m \geq 10 \)[/tex]
2. [tex]\( 3m \leq -21 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( m + 24 > 19 \)[/tex]
These compound inequalities have no solutions.
### Compound Inequality 1:
[tex]\( m + 7 < 8 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( -5m \geq 10 \)[/tex]
1. Solve [tex]\( m + 7 < 8 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ m + 7 < 8 \implies m < 1 \][/tex]
2. Solve [tex]\( -5m \geq 10 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ -5m \geq 10 \implies m \leq -2 \][/tex]
Combining these solutions, we need [tex]\( m < 1 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( m \leq -2 \)[/tex]. These conditions are incompatible since there is no number that is both less than 1 and less than or equal to -2. Therefore, this compound inequality has no solution.
### Compound Inequality 2:
[tex]\( 3m \leq -21 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( m + 24 > 19 \)[/tex]
1. Solve [tex]\( 3m \leq -21 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ 3m \leq -21 \implies m \leq -7 \][/tex]
2. Solve [tex]\( m + 24 > 19 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ m + 24 > 19 \implies m > -5 \][/tex]
Combining these solutions, we need [tex]\( m \leq -7 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( m > -5 \)[/tex]. These conditions are incompatible since there is no number that is both less than or equal to -7 and greater than -5. Therefore, this compound inequality has no solution.
### Compound Inequality 3:
[tex]\( -3m < 6 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( 4m > 24 \)[/tex]
1. Solve [tex]\( -3m < 6 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ -3m < 6 \implies m > -2 \][/tex]
2. Solve [tex]\( 4m > 24 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ 4m > 24 \implies m > 6 \][/tex]
Combining these solutions, we need [tex]\( m > -2 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( m > 6 \)[/tex]. Since [tex]\( m > 6 \)[/tex] implies that [tex]\( m > -2 \)[/tex] is already satisfied, the combined solution is [tex]\( m > 6 \)[/tex]. Therefore, this compound inequality does have a solution.
### Compound Inequality 4:
[tex]\( 3m + 7 \geq 7 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( -4m + 8 \leq -12 \)[/tex]
1. Solve [tex]\( 3m + 7 \geq 7 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ 3m + 7 \geq 7 \implies 3m \geq 0 \implies m \geq 0 \][/tex]
2. Solve [tex]\( -4m + 8 \leq -12 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ -4m + 8 \leq -12 \implies -4m \leq -20 \implies m \geq 5 \][/tex]
Combining these solutions, we need [tex]\( m \geq 0 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( m \geq 5 \)[/tex]. The combined solution is [tex]\( m \geq 5 \)[/tex]. Therefore, this compound inequality does have a solution.
### Conclusion:
Both the first and second compound inequalities have no solution. Analyzing both, they both have incompatible conditions. Thus:
1. [tex]\( m + 7 < 8 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( -5m \geq 10 \)[/tex]
2. [tex]\( 3m \leq -21 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( m + 24 > 19 \)[/tex]
These compound inequalities have no solutions.
We hope this information was helpful. Feel free to return anytime for more answers to your questions and concerns. We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. We're glad you visited Westonci.ca. Return anytime for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.