At Westonci.ca, we provide clear, reliable answers to all your questions. Join our vibrant community and get the solutions you need. Explore our Q&A platform to find reliable answers from a wide range of experts in different fields. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals.
Sagot :
Sure, let's analyze each compound inequality step by step to determine which one has no solution.
### Compound Inequality 1:
[tex]\( m + 7 < 8 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( -5m \geq 10 \)[/tex]
1. Solve [tex]\( m + 7 < 8 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ m + 7 < 8 \implies m < 1 \][/tex]
2. Solve [tex]\( -5m \geq 10 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ -5m \geq 10 \implies m \leq -2 \][/tex]
Combining these solutions, we need [tex]\( m < 1 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( m \leq -2 \)[/tex]. These conditions are incompatible since there is no number that is both less than 1 and less than or equal to -2. Therefore, this compound inequality has no solution.
### Compound Inequality 2:
[tex]\( 3m \leq -21 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( m + 24 > 19 \)[/tex]
1. Solve [tex]\( 3m \leq -21 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ 3m \leq -21 \implies m \leq -7 \][/tex]
2. Solve [tex]\( m + 24 > 19 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ m + 24 > 19 \implies m > -5 \][/tex]
Combining these solutions, we need [tex]\( m \leq -7 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( m > -5 \)[/tex]. These conditions are incompatible since there is no number that is both less than or equal to -7 and greater than -5. Therefore, this compound inequality has no solution.
### Compound Inequality 3:
[tex]\( -3m < 6 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( 4m > 24 \)[/tex]
1. Solve [tex]\( -3m < 6 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ -3m < 6 \implies m > -2 \][/tex]
2. Solve [tex]\( 4m > 24 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ 4m > 24 \implies m > 6 \][/tex]
Combining these solutions, we need [tex]\( m > -2 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( m > 6 \)[/tex]. Since [tex]\( m > 6 \)[/tex] implies that [tex]\( m > -2 \)[/tex] is already satisfied, the combined solution is [tex]\( m > 6 \)[/tex]. Therefore, this compound inequality does have a solution.
### Compound Inequality 4:
[tex]\( 3m + 7 \geq 7 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( -4m + 8 \leq -12 \)[/tex]
1. Solve [tex]\( 3m + 7 \geq 7 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ 3m + 7 \geq 7 \implies 3m \geq 0 \implies m \geq 0 \][/tex]
2. Solve [tex]\( -4m + 8 \leq -12 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ -4m + 8 \leq -12 \implies -4m \leq -20 \implies m \geq 5 \][/tex]
Combining these solutions, we need [tex]\( m \geq 0 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( m \geq 5 \)[/tex]. The combined solution is [tex]\( m \geq 5 \)[/tex]. Therefore, this compound inequality does have a solution.
### Conclusion:
Both the first and second compound inequalities have no solution. Analyzing both, they both have incompatible conditions. Thus:
1. [tex]\( m + 7 < 8 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( -5m \geq 10 \)[/tex]
2. [tex]\( 3m \leq -21 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( m + 24 > 19 \)[/tex]
These compound inequalities have no solutions.
### Compound Inequality 1:
[tex]\( m + 7 < 8 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( -5m \geq 10 \)[/tex]
1. Solve [tex]\( m + 7 < 8 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ m + 7 < 8 \implies m < 1 \][/tex]
2. Solve [tex]\( -5m \geq 10 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ -5m \geq 10 \implies m \leq -2 \][/tex]
Combining these solutions, we need [tex]\( m < 1 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( m \leq -2 \)[/tex]. These conditions are incompatible since there is no number that is both less than 1 and less than or equal to -2. Therefore, this compound inequality has no solution.
### Compound Inequality 2:
[tex]\( 3m \leq -21 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( m + 24 > 19 \)[/tex]
1. Solve [tex]\( 3m \leq -21 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ 3m \leq -21 \implies m \leq -7 \][/tex]
2. Solve [tex]\( m + 24 > 19 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ m + 24 > 19 \implies m > -5 \][/tex]
Combining these solutions, we need [tex]\( m \leq -7 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( m > -5 \)[/tex]. These conditions are incompatible since there is no number that is both less than or equal to -7 and greater than -5. Therefore, this compound inequality has no solution.
### Compound Inequality 3:
[tex]\( -3m < 6 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( 4m > 24 \)[/tex]
1. Solve [tex]\( -3m < 6 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ -3m < 6 \implies m > -2 \][/tex]
2. Solve [tex]\( 4m > 24 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ 4m > 24 \implies m > 6 \][/tex]
Combining these solutions, we need [tex]\( m > -2 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( m > 6 \)[/tex]. Since [tex]\( m > 6 \)[/tex] implies that [tex]\( m > -2 \)[/tex] is already satisfied, the combined solution is [tex]\( m > 6 \)[/tex]. Therefore, this compound inequality does have a solution.
### Compound Inequality 4:
[tex]\( 3m + 7 \geq 7 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( -4m + 8 \leq -12 \)[/tex]
1. Solve [tex]\( 3m + 7 \geq 7 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ 3m + 7 \geq 7 \implies 3m \geq 0 \implies m \geq 0 \][/tex]
2. Solve [tex]\( -4m + 8 \leq -12 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ -4m + 8 \leq -12 \implies -4m \leq -20 \implies m \geq 5 \][/tex]
Combining these solutions, we need [tex]\( m \geq 0 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( m \geq 5 \)[/tex]. The combined solution is [tex]\( m \geq 5 \)[/tex]. Therefore, this compound inequality does have a solution.
### Conclusion:
Both the first and second compound inequalities have no solution. Analyzing both, they both have incompatible conditions. Thus:
1. [tex]\( m + 7 < 8 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( -5m \geq 10 \)[/tex]
2. [tex]\( 3m \leq -21 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( m + 24 > 19 \)[/tex]
These compound inequalities have no solutions.
Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. Keep exploring Westonci.ca for more insightful answers to your questions. We're here to help.