At Westonci.ca, we connect you with the answers you need, thanks to our active and informed community. Get quick and reliable answers to your questions from a dedicated community of professionals on our platform. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.

What must be true about a game theory outcome for it to be considered a prisoner's dilemma?

A. There must be more than one Nash equilibrium in the game.
B. One outcome cannot be a Nash equilibrium.
C. The payoffs must be the worst outcome for both players.
D. There must be a different outcome that provides a higher payoff for both players.

Sagot :

Final answer:

The Prisoner's Dilemma in game theory involves two players making decisions with a payoff matrix, where betraying the partner by defecting is the dominant strategy. This results in a suboptimal outcome for both players compared to mutual cooperation.


Explanation:

The Prisoner's Dilemma is a game theory example involving two players, each with two possible actions: cooperate or defect. The payoff matrix in this game represents the outcomes based on the decisions made by each player, with certain conditions in payoffs. The key characteristic of a Prisoner's Dilemma is that betraying the partner by defecting is the dominant strategy for each player, leading to a suboptimal outcome for both when compared to mutual cooperation.


Learn more about Prisoner's Dilemma in game theory here:

https://brainly.com/question/42998574