Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, where finding answers to your questions is made simple by our community of experts. Our Q&A platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from experts in various disciplines. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.

Which of the following BEST describes Velleman's position regarding euthanasia?

A. There is no moral difference between active and passive euthanasia.
B. Patients have a right to both active and passive euthanasia.
C. The best policy regarding euthanasia is to have no policy, but allow the physician to use their discretion.
D. Patients have a right to only passive euthanasia. Active euthanasia is morally wrong.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

James Rachels argues that active euthanasia is preferable due to its ability to reduce patient suffering more effectively.


Explanation:

James Rachels challenges the notion that active euthanasia is morally wrong while passive euthanasia is permissible. He argues that the intent and result in both cases are the same, but active euthanasia can actually reduce patient suffering more effectively. Therefore, Rachels asserts that active euthanasia is preferable as it brings a swift end to suffering.


Learn more about Euthanasia here:

https://brainly.com/question/40871405


Thanks for stopping by. We are committed to providing the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Discover more at Westonci.ca. Return for the latest expert answers and updates on various topics.