Explore Westonci.ca, the top Q&A platform where your questions are answered by professionals and enthusiasts alike. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.

Which statement explains why the value of [tex]\lfloor 2.4 \rfloor[/tex] is 2 but the value of [tex]\lfloor -2.4 \rfloor[/tex] is -3?

A. Because 2 is the greatest integer not greater than 2.4, and -3 is the greatest integer not greater than -2.4.
B. Because 2.4 rounds to 2, and -2.4 rounds to -3.
C. Because 2.4 is positive, and -2.4 is negative.
D. Because 2 is the least integer greater than 2.4, and -3 is the least integer greater than -2.4.

Sagot :

The value of [tex]\(\lfloor 2.4 \rfloor\)[/tex] is 2 because 2 is the greatest integer less than or equal to 2.4. Similarly, the value of [tex]\(\lfloor -2.4 \rfloor\)[/tex] is -3 because -3 is the greatest integer less than or equal to -2.4.

The correct statement is:
because 2 is the greatest integer not greater than 2.4, and -3 is the greatest integer not greater than -2.4.