Westonci.ca is your trusted source for finding answers to all your questions. Ask, explore, and learn with our expert community. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.
Sagot :
Here's a detailed two-column proof for the given problem.
| Statements | Reasons |
|-----------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
| 1. [tex]\( AB = CD \)[/tex] | Given |
| 2. [tex]\( BC = DE \)[/tex] | Given |
| 3. [tex]\( AB + BC = CD + BC \)[/tex] | Addition property of equality |
| 4. [tex]\( CD + BC = CD + DE \)[/tex] | Substitution property of equality |
| 5. [tex]\( AB + BC = AC \)[/tex] | Segment addition (AB + BC = AC) |
| 6. [tex]\( CD + DE = CE \)[/tex] | Segment addition (CD + DE = CE) |
| 7. [tex]\( AC = CE \)[/tex] | Substitution property of equality |
Let's break down each part of the proof:
1. Statement: [tex]\( AB = CD \)[/tex]
- Reason: Given
2. Statement: [tex]\( BC = DE \)[/tex]
- Reason: Given
3. Statement: [tex]\( AB + BC = CD + BC \)[/tex]
- Reason: Addition property of equality (we add [tex]\( BC \)[/tex] to both sides of the equalities in previous steps)
4. Statement: [tex]\( CD + BC = CD + DE \)[/tex]
- Reason: Substitution property of equality (replacing [tex]\( BC \)[/tex] with [tex]\( DE \)[/tex] based on step 2)
5. Statement: [tex]\( AB + BC = AC \)[/tex]
- Reason: Segment addition (defining [tex]\( AC \)[/tex] as the combined length of segments [tex]\( AB \)[/tex] and [tex]\( BC \)[/tex])
6. Statement: [tex]\( CD + DE = CE \)[/tex]
- Reason: Segment addition (defining [tex]\( CE \)[/tex] as the combined length of segments [tex]\( CD \)[/tex] and [tex]\( DE \)[/tex])
7. Statement: [tex]\( AC = CE \)[/tex]
- Reason: Substitution property of equality (replacing [tex]\( AB + BC \)[/tex] with [tex]\( AC \)[/tex] and [tex]\( CD + DE \)[/tex] with [tex]\( CE \)[/tex] from steps 5 and 6)
| Statements | Reasons |
|-----------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
| 1. [tex]\( AB = CD \)[/tex] | Given |
| 2. [tex]\( BC = DE \)[/tex] | Given |
| 3. [tex]\( AB + BC = CD + BC \)[/tex] | Addition property of equality |
| 4. [tex]\( CD + BC = CD + DE \)[/tex] | Substitution property of equality |
| 5. [tex]\( AB + BC = AC \)[/tex] | Segment addition (AB + BC = AC) |
| 6. [tex]\( CD + DE = CE \)[/tex] | Segment addition (CD + DE = CE) |
| 7. [tex]\( AC = CE \)[/tex] | Substitution property of equality |
Let's break down each part of the proof:
1. Statement: [tex]\( AB = CD \)[/tex]
- Reason: Given
2. Statement: [tex]\( BC = DE \)[/tex]
- Reason: Given
3. Statement: [tex]\( AB + BC = CD + BC \)[/tex]
- Reason: Addition property of equality (we add [tex]\( BC \)[/tex] to both sides of the equalities in previous steps)
4. Statement: [tex]\( CD + BC = CD + DE \)[/tex]
- Reason: Substitution property of equality (replacing [tex]\( BC \)[/tex] with [tex]\( DE \)[/tex] based on step 2)
5. Statement: [tex]\( AB + BC = AC \)[/tex]
- Reason: Segment addition (defining [tex]\( AC \)[/tex] as the combined length of segments [tex]\( AB \)[/tex] and [tex]\( BC \)[/tex])
6. Statement: [tex]\( CD + DE = CE \)[/tex]
- Reason: Segment addition (defining [tex]\( CE \)[/tex] as the combined length of segments [tex]\( CD \)[/tex] and [tex]\( DE \)[/tex])
7. Statement: [tex]\( AC = CE \)[/tex]
- Reason: Substitution property of equality (replacing [tex]\( AB + BC \)[/tex] with [tex]\( AC \)[/tex] and [tex]\( CD + DE \)[/tex] with [tex]\( CE \)[/tex] from steps 5 and 6)
Thanks for using our platform. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Thank you for trusting Westonci.ca. Don't forget to revisit us for more accurate and insightful answers.