Explore Westonci.ca, the top Q&A platform where your questions are answered by professionals and enthusiasts alike. Explore our Q&A platform to find in-depth answers from a wide range of experts in different fields. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform.
Sagot :
Here's a detailed two-column proof for the given problem.
| Statements | Reasons |
|-----------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
| 1. [tex]\( AB = CD \)[/tex] | Given |
| 2. [tex]\( BC = DE \)[/tex] | Given |
| 3. [tex]\( AB + BC = CD + BC \)[/tex] | Addition property of equality |
| 4. [tex]\( CD + BC = CD + DE \)[/tex] | Substitution property of equality |
| 5. [tex]\( AB + BC = AC \)[/tex] | Segment addition (AB + BC = AC) |
| 6. [tex]\( CD + DE = CE \)[/tex] | Segment addition (CD + DE = CE) |
| 7. [tex]\( AC = CE \)[/tex] | Substitution property of equality |
Let's break down each part of the proof:
1. Statement: [tex]\( AB = CD \)[/tex]
- Reason: Given
2. Statement: [tex]\( BC = DE \)[/tex]
- Reason: Given
3. Statement: [tex]\( AB + BC = CD + BC \)[/tex]
- Reason: Addition property of equality (we add [tex]\( BC \)[/tex] to both sides of the equalities in previous steps)
4. Statement: [tex]\( CD + BC = CD + DE \)[/tex]
- Reason: Substitution property of equality (replacing [tex]\( BC \)[/tex] with [tex]\( DE \)[/tex] based on step 2)
5. Statement: [tex]\( AB + BC = AC \)[/tex]
- Reason: Segment addition (defining [tex]\( AC \)[/tex] as the combined length of segments [tex]\( AB \)[/tex] and [tex]\( BC \)[/tex])
6. Statement: [tex]\( CD + DE = CE \)[/tex]
- Reason: Segment addition (defining [tex]\( CE \)[/tex] as the combined length of segments [tex]\( CD \)[/tex] and [tex]\( DE \)[/tex])
7. Statement: [tex]\( AC = CE \)[/tex]
- Reason: Substitution property of equality (replacing [tex]\( AB + BC \)[/tex] with [tex]\( AC \)[/tex] and [tex]\( CD + DE \)[/tex] with [tex]\( CE \)[/tex] from steps 5 and 6)
| Statements | Reasons |
|-----------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
| 1. [tex]\( AB = CD \)[/tex] | Given |
| 2. [tex]\( BC = DE \)[/tex] | Given |
| 3. [tex]\( AB + BC = CD + BC \)[/tex] | Addition property of equality |
| 4. [tex]\( CD + BC = CD + DE \)[/tex] | Substitution property of equality |
| 5. [tex]\( AB + BC = AC \)[/tex] | Segment addition (AB + BC = AC) |
| 6. [tex]\( CD + DE = CE \)[/tex] | Segment addition (CD + DE = CE) |
| 7. [tex]\( AC = CE \)[/tex] | Substitution property of equality |
Let's break down each part of the proof:
1. Statement: [tex]\( AB = CD \)[/tex]
- Reason: Given
2. Statement: [tex]\( BC = DE \)[/tex]
- Reason: Given
3. Statement: [tex]\( AB + BC = CD + BC \)[/tex]
- Reason: Addition property of equality (we add [tex]\( BC \)[/tex] to both sides of the equalities in previous steps)
4. Statement: [tex]\( CD + BC = CD + DE \)[/tex]
- Reason: Substitution property of equality (replacing [tex]\( BC \)[/tex] with [tex]\( DE \)[/tex] based on step 2)
5. Statement: [tex]\( AB + BC = AC \)[/tex]
- Reason: Segment addition (defining [tex]\( AC \)[/tex] as the combined length of segments [tex]\( AB \)[/tex] and [tex]\( BC \)[/tex])
6. Statement: [tex]\( CD + DE = CE \)[/tex]
- Reason: Segment addition (defining [tex]\( CE \)[/tex] as the combined length of segments [tex]\( CD \)[/tex] and [tex]\( DE \)[/tex])
7. Statement: [tex]\( AC = CE \)[/tex]
- Reason: Substitution property of equality (replacing [tex]\( AB + BC \)[/tex] with [tex]\( AC \)[/tex] and [tex]\( CD + DE \)[/tex] with [tex]\( CE \)[/tex] from steps 5 and 6)
Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. We're glad you visited Westonci.ca. Return anytime for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.