Westonci.ca is your trusted source for finding answers to a wide range of questions, backed by a knowledgeable community. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.
Sagot :
Jayden and Alexa made mistakes in their calculations. Let's walk through their mistakes and provide the corrected solution step-by-step.
### Jayden's Approach
1. Jayden incorrectly simplified the combinations and treated the factorial calculations incorrectly. His attempt was:
[tex]\[\frac{6!}{2!(6-2)!} + \frac{6!}{3!(6-3)!} \neq \frac{7!}{3!(7-3)!}\][/tex]
Simplifying,
[tex]\[\frac{6!}{2! \cdot 4!} + \frac{6!}{3! \cdot 3!} \neq \frac{7!}{3! \cdot 4!}\][/tex]
2. Correct calculation of [tex]\({ }_6C_2\)[/tex] and [tex]\({ }_6C_3\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ { }_6C_2 = \frac{6!}{2! \cdot 4!} = \frac{6 \cdot 5}{2 \cdot 1} = 15 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ { }_6C_3 = \frac{6!}{3! \cdot 3!} = \frac{6 \cdot 5 \cdot 4}{3 \cdot 2 \cdot 1} = 20 \][/tex]
3. Sum of the calculated combinations:
[tex]\[ { }_6C_2 + { }_6C_3 = 15 + 20 = 35 \][/tex]
4. Correct calculation of [tex]\({ }_7C_3\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ { }_7C_3 = \frac{7!}{3! \cdot 4!} = \frac{7 \cdot 6 \cdot 5}{3 \cdot 2 \cdot 1} = 35 \][/tex]
Therefore, [tex]\({ }_6C_2 + { }_6C_3 = { }_7C_3\)[/tex] is indeed true as both sides simplify to 35.
### Alexa's Approach
1. Alexa's initial step was correct but her use of the least common denominator was convoluted. Here's the correction using combinations:
[tex]\[ { }_6C_2 = \frac{6!}{2! \cdot 4!} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ { }_6C_3 = \frac{6!}{3! \cdot 3!} \][/tex]
[tex]\(\Rightarrow\)[/tex]
[tex]\[ { }_6C_2 + { }_6C_3 = 15 + 20 \][/tex]
2. As before, the combined result is:
[tex]\[ 15 + 20 = 35 \][/tex]
3. Alexa’s final check:
[tex]\[ { }_7C_3 = \frac{7!}{3! \cdot 4!} \][/tex]
[tex]\(\Rightarrow\)[/tex]
[tex]\[ { }_7C_3 = 35 \][/tex]
So, once corrected, Alexa's result too shows [tex]\({ }_6C_2 + { }_6C_3 = { }_7C_3.\)[/tex]
### Conclusion
Both Jayden and Alexa made mistakes initially but when corrected, both paths show the correct result. The identity [tex]\({ }_6C_2 + { }_6C_3 = { }_7C_3\)[/tex] holds true since:
[tex]\[ 15 + 20 = 35,\][/tex]
and hence,
[tex]\[35 = 35.\][/tex]
Thus, Jayden and Alexa both arrive at the correct conclusion when their errors are corrected.
### Jayden's Approach
1. Jayden incorrectly simplified the combinations and treated the factorial calculations incorrectly. His attempt was:
[tex]\[\frac{6!}{2!(6-2)!} + \frac{6!}{3!(6-3)!} \neq \frac{7!}{3!(7-3)!}\][/tex]
Simplifying,
[tex]\[\frac{6!}{2! \cdot 4!} + \frac{6!}{3! \cdot 3!} \neq \frac{7!}{3! \cdot 4!}\][/tex]
2. Correct calculation of [tex]\({ }_6C_2\)[/tex] and [tex]\({ }_6C_3\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ { }_6C_2 = \frac{6!}{2! \cdot 4!} = \frac{6 \cdot 5}{2 \cdot 1} = 15 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ { }_6C_3 = \frac{6!}{3! \cdot 3!} = \frac{6 \cdot 5 \cdot 4}{3 \cdot 2 \cdot 1} = 20 \][/tex]
3. Sum of the calculated combinations:
[tex]\[ { }_6C_2 + { }_6C_3 = 15 + 20 = 35 \][/tex]
4. Correct calculation of [tex]\({ }_7C_3\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ { }_7C_3 = \frac{7!}{3! \cdot 4!} = \frac{7 \cdot 6 \cdot 5}{3 \cdot 2 \cdot 1} = 35 \][/tex]
Therefore, [tex]\({ }_6C_2 + { }_6C_3 = { }_7C_3\)[/tex] is indeed true as both sides simplify to 35.
### Alexa's Approach
1. Alexa's initial step was correct but her use of the least common denominator was convoluted. Here's the correction using combinations:
[tex]\[ { }_6C_2 = \frac{6!}{2! \cdot 4!} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ { }_6C_3 = \frac{6!}{3! \cdot 3!} \][/tex]
[tex]\(\Rightarrow\)[/tex]
[tex]\[ { }_6C_2 + { }_6C_3 = 15 + 20 \][/tex]
2. As before, the combined result is:
[tex]\[ 15 + 20 = 35 \][/tex]
3. Alexa’s final check:
[tex]\[ { }_7C_3 = \frac{7!}{3! \cdot 4!} \][/tex]
[tex]\(\Rightarrow\)[/tex]
[tex]\[ { }_7C_3 = 35 \][/tex]
So, once corrected, Alexa's result too shows [tex]\({ }_6C_2 + { }_6C_3 = { }_7C_3.\)[/tex]
### Conclusion
Both Jayden and Alexa made mistakes initially but when corrected, both paths show the correct result. The identity [tex]\({ }_6C_2 + { }_6C_3 = { }_7C_3\)[/tex] holds true since:
[tex]\[ 15 + 20 = 35,\][/tex]
and hence,
[tex]\[35 = 35.\][/tex]
Thus, Jayden and Alexa both arrive at the correct conclusion when their errors are corrected.
We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca. Stay informed by coming back for more detailed answers.