Welcome to Westonci.ca, where finding answers to your questions is made simple by our community of experts. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts.

Given: [tex]\(-\frac{1}{2} x \ \textgreater \ 4\)[/tex]

Choose the solution set.

A. [tex]\(\{x \mid x \in R, x \ \textgreater \ -2\}\)[/tex]

B. [tex]\(\{x \mid x \in R, x \ \textless \ -8\}\)[/tex]

C. [tex]\(\{x \mid x \in R, x \ \textless \ -2\}\)[/tex]

D. [tex]\(\{x \mid x \in R, x \ \textgreater \ -8\}\)[/tex]

Sagot :

Certainly! Let's solve the inequality step-by-step:

Given the inequality:
[tex]\[ -\frac{1}{2} x > 4 \][/tex]

### Step 1: Isolate the variable [tex]\( x \)[/tex]
To isolate [tex]\( x \)[/tex], we need to get rid of the fraction. We can start by multiplying both sides of the inequality by [tex]\(-2\)[/tex]. However, when we multiply or divide an inequality by a negative number, we must reverse the inequality sign.

So, let's proceed:
[tex]\[ -2 \cdot \left( -\frac{1}{2} x \right) < -2 \cdot 4 \][/tex]

This simplifies to:
[tex]\[ x < -8 \][/tex]

### Step 2: Identify the solution set
The solution to our inequality is:
[tex]\[ x < -8 \][/tex]

Now let's compare this with the given options:
1. [tex]\(\{x \mid x \in \mathbb{R}, x > -2\}\)[/tex]
2. [tex]\(\{x \mid x \in \mathbb{R}, x < -8\}\)[/tex]
3. [tex]\(\{x \mid x \in \mathbb{R}, x < -2\}\)[/tex]
4. [tex]\(\{x \mid x \in \mathbb{R}, x > -8\}\)[/tex]

The correct solution set is:
[tex]\(\{x \mid x \in \mathbb{R}, x < -8\}\)[/tex]

So, the appropriate choice is:
[tex]\(\{x \mid x \in \mathbb{R}, x < -8 \}\)[/tex], which corresponds to option 2.