Find the best solutions to your questions at Westonci.ca, the premier Q&A platform with a community of knowledgeable experts. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our Q&A platform. Connect with a community of professionals ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently.
Sagot :
Final answer:
Sultan Mahmud of Ghazna and Sultan Muhammad of Ghur had different motives for invading India, with Mahmud focusing on power consolidation and legacy building, while Muhammad aimed at territorial expansion and defeating local Hindu rulers.
Explanation:
Sultan Mahmud of Ghazna: Mahmud's motives for invading India were driven by a desire to showcase his military prowess, secure his legacy, and utilize Indian wealth to enhance his capital in Ghazna. His campaigns were not solely focused on spreading Islam but rather on the traditional reasons of revenue and power consolidation.
Sultan Muhammad of Ghur: In contrast, Sultan Muhammad of Ghur aimed to extend his empire across northern India by defeating the Rajputs and establishing the Ghurid Empire. His primary foes were the regional Hindu kingdoms, and his conquests led to the establishment of the Delhi Sultanate in India.
Differences in motives: Mahmud's incursions were more about internal stability, power display, and legacy building, while Muhammad of Ghur's invasions were driven by territorial expansion and the defeat of local Hindu rulers.
Learn more about Motives for invading India by Sultan Mahmud of Ghazna and Sultan Muhammad of Ghur here:
https://brainly.com/question/32027815
We appreciate your visit. Hopefully, the answers you found were beneficial. Don't hesitate to come back for more information. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Thank you for choosing Westonci.ca as your information source. We look forward to your next visit.