Westonci.ca is your go-to source for answers, with a community ready to provide accurate and timely information. Explore thousands of questions and answers from a knowledgeable community of experts on our user-friendly platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.
Sagot :
Final answer:
Sultan Mahmud of Ghazna and Sultan Muhammad of Ghur had different motives for invading India, with Mahmud focusing on power consolidation and legacy building, while Muhammad aimed at territorial expansion and defeating local Hindu rulers.
Explanation:
Sultan Mahmud of Ghazna: Mahmud's motives for invading India were driven by a desire to showcase his military prowess, secure his legacy, and utilize Indian wealth to enhance his capital in Ghazna. His campaigns were not solely focused on spreading Islam but rather on the traditional reasons of revenue and power consolidation.
Sultan Muhammad of Ghur: In contrast, Sultan Muhammad of Ghur aimed to extend his empire across northern India by defeating the Rajputs and establishing the Ghurid Empire. His primary foes were the regional Hindu kingdoms, and his conquests led to the establishment of the Delhi Sultanate in India.
Differences in motives: Mahmud's incursions were more about internal stability, power display, and legacy building, while Muhammad of Ghur's invasions were driven by territorial expansion and the defeat of local Hindu rulers.
Learn more about Motives for invading India by Sultan Mahmud of Ghazna and Sultan Muhammad of Ghur here:
https://brainly.com/question/32027815
Visit us again for up-to-date and reliable answers. We're always ready to assist you with your informational needs. We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Discover more at Westonci.ca. Return for the latest expert answers and updates on various topics.