Westonci.ca offers fast, accurate answers to your questions. Join our community and get the insights you need now. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding precise answers from a network of experienced professionals. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.
Sagot :
Final answer:
Sultan Mahmud of Ghazna and Sultan Muhammad of Ghur had different motives for invading India, with Mahmud focusing on power consolidation and legacy building, while Muhammad aimed at territorial expansion and defeating local Hindu rulers.
Explanation:
Sultan Mahmud of Ghazna: Mahmud's motives for invading India were driven by a desire to showcase his military prowess, secure his legacy, and utilize Indian wealth to enhance his capital in Ghazna. His campaigns were not solely focused on spreading Islam but rather on the traditional reasons of revenue and power consolidation.
Sultan Muhammad of Ghur: In contrast, Sultan Muhammad of Ghur aimed to extend his empire across northern India by defeating the Rajputs and establishing the Ghurid Empire. His primary foes were the regional Hindu kingdoms, and his conquests led to the establishment of the Delhi Sultanate in India.
Differences in motives: Mahmud's incursions were more about internal stability, power display, and legacy building, while Muhammad of Ghur's invasions were driven by territorial expansion and the defeat of local Hindu rulers.
Learn more about Motives for invading India by Sultan Mahmud of Ghazna and Sultan Muhammad of Ghur here:
https://brainly.com/question/32027815
We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Westonci.ca is here to provide the answers you seek. Return often for more expert solutions.