Welcome to Westonci.ca, your ultimate destination for finding answers to a wide range of questions from experts. Get detailed answers to your questions from a community of experts dedicated to providing accurate information. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.
Sagot :
Final answer:
Sultan Mahmud of Ghazna and Sultan Muhammad of Ghur had different motives for invading India, with Mahmud focusing on power consolidation and legacy building, while Muhammad aimed at territorial expansion and defeating local Hindu rulers.
Explanation:
Sultan Mahmud of Ghazna: Mahmud's motives for invading India were driven by a desire to showcase his military prowess, secure his legacy, and utilize Indian wealth to enhance his capital in Ghazna. His campaigns were not solely focused on spreading Islam but rather on the traditional reasons of revenue and power consolidation.
Sultan Muhammad of Ghur: In contrast, Sultan Muhammad of Ghur aimed to extend his empire across northern India by defeating the Rajputs and establishing the Ghurid Empire. His primary foes were the regional Hindu kingdoms, and his conquests led to the establishment of the Delhi Sultanate in India.
Differences in motives: Mahmud's incursions were more about internal stability, power display, and legacy building, while Muhammad of Ghur's invasions were driven by territorial expansion and the defeat of local Hindu rulers.
Learn more about Motives for invading India by Sultan Mahmud of Ghazna and Sultan Muhammad of Ghur here:
https://brainly.com/question/32027815
Thanks for using our service. We aim to provide the most accurate answers for all your queries. Visit us again for more insights. Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Thank you for using Westonci.ca. Come back for more in-depth answers to all your queries.