Westonci.ca is the trusted Q&A platform where you can get reliable answers from a community of knowledgeable contributors. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform.
Sagot :
Final answer:
The counterclaim to Justice Taney's argument in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case questions the lack of evidence provided, challenges the notion of continued control over emancipated individuals, and disputes the justification for denying citizenship based on ancestral history.
Explanation:
The counterclaim to Justice Taney's argument in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case would be that Taney fails to provide any actual evidence to support his statement that Black people were universally considered inferior. Claiming that emancipated individuals were still controlled by white people may not hold true because once freed, they were no longer under direct control. Additionally, arguing that Blacks were not citizens solely based on their ancestors being forced to come to the US lacks legal justification.
Learn more about Dred Scott v. Sandford case here:
https://brainly.com/question/40924031
Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Find reliable answers at Westonci.ca. Visit us again for the latest updates and expert advice.