Westonci.ca is the premier destination for reliable answers to your questions, provided by a community of experts. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform.
Sagot :
To determine whether the given statement [tex]\((p \rightarrow a) \leftrightarrow (\sim p \vee a)\)[/tex] is a tautology, a contradiction, or a contingency, let's go through the evaluation step-by-step.
### Step 1: Understand the Statements
First, understand the logical components:
- [tex]\( p \rightarrow a \)[/tex] (If [tex]\( p \)[/tex], then [tex]\( a \)[/tex])
- [tex]\( \sim p \)[/tex] (Not [tex]\( p \)[/tex])
- [tex]\( \sim p \vee a \)[/tex] (Not [tex]\( p \)[/tex] or [tex]\( a \)[/tex])
- [tex]\( \leftrightarrow \)[/tex] (Logical equivalence)
### Step 2: Express in Truth Table
To evaluate this, we can use a truth table, but instead, we'll logically simplify to avoid an exhaustive truth table since the evaluation shows it's a special logical form.
### Step 3: Logical Equivalence
We'll analyze the logical equivalence:
The implication [tex]\( p \rightarrow a \)[/tex] can be rewritten as [tex]\( \sim p \vee a \)[/tex] because an implication is true in the same cases when "not [tex]\( p \)[/tex]" or [tex]\( a \)[/tex] is true.
The expression [tex]\((p \rightarrow a)\)[/tex] is logically equivalent to [tex]\((\sim p \vee a)\)[/tex]. Thus, [tex]\( (p \rightarrow a) \leftrightarrow (\sim p \vee a) \)[/tex] simplifies to:
### Step 4: Simplify the Statement
- Since [tex]\( p \rightarrow a \)[/tex] is equivalent to [tex]\( \sim p \vee a \)[/tex], rewriting the original statement:
[tex]\[ (p \rightarrow a) \leftrightarrow (\sim p \vee a) \][/tex]
becomes:
[tex]\[ (\sim p \vee a) \leftrightarrow (\sim p \vee a) \][/tex]
### Step 5: Simplified Expression
- The expression [tex]\( (\sim p \vee a) \leftrightarrow (\sim p \vee a) \)[/tex] should be evaluated.
Since any statement is logically equivalent to itself, this results in a true statement universally, i.e., a tautology. This is because both sides are exactly the same, thereby always resulting in true.
### Conclusion:
Given the analysis, the statement [tex]\((p \rightarrow a) \leftrightarrow (\sim p \vee a)\)[/tex] is always true regardless of the truth values of [tex]\( p \)[/tex] and [tex]\( a \)[/tex]. Hence, it is a tautology.
Thus, the statement pattern [tex]\((p \rightarrow a) \leftrightarrow (\sim p \vee a)\)[/tex] is a Tautology.
### Step 1: Understand the Statements
First, understand the logical components:
- [tex]\( p \rightarrow a \)[/tex] (If [tex]\( p \)[/tex], then [tex]\( a \)[/tex])
- [tex]\( \sim p \)[/tex] (Not [tex]\( p \)[/tex])
- [tex]\( \sim p \vee a \)[/tex] (Not [tex]\( p \)[/tex] or [tex]\( a \)[/tex])
- [tex]\( \leftrightarrow \)[/tex] (Logical equivalence)
### Step 2: Express in Truth Table
To evaluate this, we can use a truth table, but instead, we'll logically simplify to avoid an exhaustive truth table since the evaluation shows it's a special logical form.
### Step 3: Logical Equivalence
We'll analyze the logical equivalence:
The implication [tex]\( p \rightarrow a \)[/tex] can be rewritten as [tex]\( \sim p \vee a \)[/tex] because an implication is true in the same cases when "not [tex]\( p \)[/tex]" or [tex]\( a \)[/tex] is true.
The expression [tex]\((p \rightarrow a)\)[/tex] is logically equivalent to [tex]\((\sim p \vee a)\)[/tex]. Thus, [tex]\( (p \rightarrow a) \leftrightarrow (\sim p \vee a) \)[/tex] simplifies to:
### Step 4: Simplify the Statement
- Since [tex]\( p \rightarrow a \)[/tex] is equivalent to [tex]\( \sim p \vee a \)[/tex], rewriting the original statement:
[tex]\[ (p \rightarrow a) \leftrightarrow (\sim p \vee a) \][/tex]
becomes:
[tex]\[ (\sim p \vee a) \leftrightarrow (\sim p \vee a) \][/tex]
### Step 5: Simplified Expression
- The expression [tex]\( (\sim p \vee a) \leftrightarrow (\sim p \vee a) \)[/tex] should be evaluated.
Since any statement is logically equivalent to itself, this results in a true statement universally, i.e., a tautology. This is because both sides are exactly the same, thereby always resulting in true.
### Conclusion:
Given the analysis, the statement [tex]\((p \rightarrow a) \leftrightarrow (\sim p \vee a)\)[/tex] is always true regardless of the truth values of [tex]\( p \)[/tex] and [tex]\( a \)[/tex]. Hence, it is a tautology.
Thus, the statement pattern [tex]\((p \rightarrow a) \leftrightarrow (\sim p \vee a)\)[/tex] is a Tautology.
Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. Thank you for trusting Westonci.ca. Don't forget to revisit us for more accurate and insightful answers.